,

Academics and Church growth: a demographic just-so story

•

This is based much more on personal observation and ad-hoc local history than on any kind of formal study, but I suspect that a consistent pattern affecting Church growth in the U.S. since World War II went something like this:

Like many academically ambitious young people, significant numbers of young adult Latter-day Saints in past decades chose to pursue graduate study. In many cases, this meant dispersion from the dense LDS population centers of the Intermountain West to the major grad programs of the Midwest and the coasts. With the expansion of American universities and student-age populations in the later 20th century, opportunities for academic employment were relatively plentiful, but the geography of academic hiring also meant that most people’s careers started with a move down the prestige ladder, from large and prominent universities to smaller colleges and regional campuses.

At universities with large graduate programs, LDS students tracing this path fed the development of large wards stocked with grad student families (back in the day, our ward in Urbana, one of three family wards in close proximity to the University of Illinois, had 70 children beneath the age of 2). But there was also a high turnover rate as new students arrived to replace those who graduated and left the area.

More importantly, the next step in this career path – finding a first academic job – often led to young, stable families with substantial Church experience seeding or refreshing wards and branches in places where Church membership was low, often in smaller towns far from centers of Church membership. After investing close to a decade in starting a career path, if your one chance to continue it means accepting a job in Warrensburg, you go. And in many cases, that means you stay. Academic careers can be frustratingly static and fail to match graduate student ambitions, but people – especially those with young children in tow – also discover that there are worse things in life than a stable job in a livable town.

For seeding Church members into far-flung places, the academic path isn’t unique. There’s a parallel, sometimes overlapping path that runs through professional schools, for example. But the academic path was common enough to be a noticeable factor in wards throughout the U.S. (The population growth and economic strength of Utah in recent years has also made it much easier for successful professionals to make the return trip back to the Wasatch Front than for most academics.)

The academic path of LDS dispersion isn’t what it once was, however. The last 15 years have seen a stagnation of faculty employment, affecting the academic route for seeding wards and branches. Locally, this has meant a slowdown from a new academic family every few years, to one or two per decade. Academia has also become more overtly secular and moved farther left politically, potentially making it a less attractive career choice for LDS students, and perhaps making it less willing to welcome them, although evidence for both possibilities is scant.

It’s also possible that a contingent of LDS academics has become a vanguard of a different sort. Even with political views farther left than typical ward members, LDS academics may face higher tension between their religious and professional lives than other members, and potentially higher professional costs of church membership. Academics may be over-represented among the populations of formerly active members, families whose names are read in but never attend, and members who disappear from the ward list without any announcement that they need help moving.

If so, given the geographic structure of academic hiring, then the thumb in the eye on the way out is often delivered not to a large ward stocked with generational members like the ward they grew up in, or a ward overstocked with grad student families like the ward they attended while earning their degrees. Instead, these final wards are more likely to have immigrant, working class, and economically precarious members. The wards they leave behind never have enough people already possessing the requisite skills to staff all the teaching or leadership positions, and the number of people needing rides often outstrips the number of people who can bring them to church.


Comments

20 responses to “Academics and Church growth: a demographic just-so story”

  1. I think a lot of this hinges on the discipline. I’ve never seen an up-and-coming math professor fit this mold (although I’m sure some do). In fact, a current UC-Berkeley statistics professor was one of the very few in my East Coast graduate student-heavy ward who did his home teaching (and by all accounts he’s still the kind who does his home teaching).

    But yes, I take your broader point, although some of this runs parallel to the decline in academic jobs more generally from the perfect storm they’re experiencing. Yes, wokeism and explicitly allying themselves with the political losing team is a part of it (although I do feel like that’s peaked somewhat), but some of it is just plain demographics, and now when things were already trepidatious some if not most disciplines are facing an existential storm from AI. Many of us grew up with the idea of academia being a solid career choice with security, but given the job market bloodbath of the past decade or two it’s really hard to see somebody suggesting it in informed good faith.

    So anyway, all that is to say that the proverbial academic member pipeline drying up might be collinear with the academic pipelines in general drying up, although it is true that for some disciplines the Overton window of acceptable social views does not overlap with orthodox Mormonism like it may have in the past.

  2. In doing family history research I had opportunity to closely study the records of the the Northern States Mission, which at the time included much of the Midwest (Iowa, Illinois, Nebraska, etc.). My interest was southeast Iowa, but because I now live in Lincoln, NE I was also watching reports from that area as well. I observed that a huge factor in the LDS diaspora that created new units in this area during the 1950s and 1960s was the Agriculture programs (either folks coming out of Utah State or Arizona State, or coming to the big Ag schools in Iowa, Illinois, and Nebraska). So many leaders of little branches came out here as Ag teachers or Ag Specialists (lots of USDA types).

    For lots of reasons, that pipeline is quite dead, but it built a lot of buildings (including the one I currently attend church in). So, all this to say that I agree with you, just adding that Ag is perhaps an invisible aspect of the once formidable pipeline.

  3. Stephen and Coffinberry, I agree. There’s a lot of nuance and variation that depends on what particular disciplines have done over the last several decades. (I do have positive feelings about Nebraska ag programs these days though, since our current bishop is a graduate.)

  4. LDS Social Science Academics are likely on the endangered list except maybe economics.
    Subjective but it does seem like Western US white male members are more likely to do Dentistry and Business instead of becoming a teacher.

  5. I have noticed a similar pattern in a different career path… the MBA. BYU used to send MBAs all over the country, including where I live in the PNW: a steady supply of new young-ish families.

    But for a variety of reasons, that pipeline, at least to my region, is all but dried up.

  6. RL, dentistry seems like a pretty good choice: you can help people in a concrete way, much better work-life balance, a real financial payoff, etc.

    Michael, that’s interesting, and kind of concerning. Any theories on what’s going on?

  7. The branch I used to advise fits this story perfectly. When I was assigned, two professors at the local college were the branch president and one of his counselors, and their wives were also pillars of the branch. When they moved away, the branch suffered. Fortunately one new professor moved in–he’s now the Elder’s Quorum President and his wife is the Primary President–but they’re still short-handed.

    I live in one of those grad student wards (I moved down the prestige ladder by becoming staff rather than faculty while staying at the same university). One major change is that the grad student couples have substantially fewer children than they did even 20 years ago, so our Primary is small. No doubt that’s partially because much more often than in the past it’s the wife who is the grad student (or they both are). But some mothers of young children successfully navigate challenging graduate programs and even medical residencies, so it can be done.

    But…I think the politicalization of universities has been greatly exaggerated. Sure, most of the faculty are Democrats–the realignment of the parties along educational lines under Trump has seen to that. But politics is irrelevant* to most of what a university does, and in departments like Chemistry, Physics, Engineering, etc. it comes up no more often than in the average workplace. The politics is mostly concentrated in the social sciences (with the twist that Economics often leans right) and the humanities. Many of the stories you hear on Fox News about extremists at universities are true, but they’re not typical. Zealous undergrads have a lot less power than either they or the right-wing media think they have.

    Church members do just fine in the apolitical fields. Off the top of my head, current and past leaders around my stake include professors in Chemical Engineering, Physics, Biology, Accounting, Statistics, Geology, and more. Church members do struggle more in the social sciences and humanities. Conflicts with the Church are especially serious in behavioral health fields like psychology and social work, and that’s where I see members struggle the most. Of course if members go into the “studies” (gender studies, LGBT studies, etc.) odds are they’re already on their way out.

    *Okay, politics were irrelevant until the second Trump administration took a sledgehammer to federally funded research (and scared off so many foreign students). If grant funding goes back to being apolitical the hard science researchers will go back to being apolitical too, at least in the workplace. But even now, nobody in Chemical Engineering really cares what you think about the Proclamation on the Family.

  8. Thanks, RLD. I was wondering what your perspective would be. When we first started grad school, my wife felt like some ward members didn’t know quite what to make of her, as both of us were pursuing degrees. Then when we had our first kid, it was easier to fit in, but she sometimes felt more slotted into a box than understood. But that was 30 years ago.

    I agree that the representation of academic politicization has been badly distorted – what happens at some high-priced SLACs and R1s is not what happens elsewhere, where most faculty just want to teach and research. Then again, those are influential departments, and other departments hire their graduates and sometimes want some of that activist glamour for themselves. And the leftward lean of some disciplines is quite real, which can have unintended consequences even with the best of intentions (like the institutionalization of land acknowledgments that can be off-putting to some conservatives, and things of that nature). It’s been striking how often Stephen C.’s research roundups include articles that are quite comfortable treating the Church less as an object of study than as a disease to be cured, or a hostile entity to be resisted. And since a lot of largely apolitical departments are in colleges of arts and sciences, they can’t escape decisions made in the dean’s office.

  9. Why would church members struggle more in the social sciences and humanities?

  10. As an aside, this goes back a while. My great-grandfather was a U of Chicago Zoology PhD back in the early 20th century, and when reading over his materials on FamilySearch he mentioned that Mormons had a reputation for wanting to get back West after getting their degrees (he ended up teaching at some college in Idaho and stopped believing, this was back when there was less space for LDS evolutionists, but he let my great-grandmother raise the family LDS, so here I am). So the coastal-degree-to-Mormon-Corridor pipeline has an old history.

  11. Jader3d: Overton windows. It’s not as bald faced as some “God’s not Dead” professor challenging your faith, but the operating background software is that if your institution is heteronormative or has gender roles that it’s damaging.

  12. To try to answer jader3d’s question, and to agree with Stephen C and Jonathan, in most social science and humanities departments there is a very strong consensus that it is harmful to treat men and women differently, or to treat same-sex and opposite-sex relationships differently. Also, that if someone has strong and persistent gender dysphoria, the best treatment is for them to transition to the gender they identify with, and society has an obligation to treat them as belonging to that gender. So a church that doesn’t ordain women to the priesthood and excludes them from many positions of authority, does not perform or recognize same-sex marriages, and refuses to recognize gender transitions is, depending on the temperament of the individual, an unfortunate reality to tolerate, a problem to solve, or an enemy to defeat.

    In those departments, but really only in those departments, these issues are regular topics of discussion. The Church doesn’t come up all that often, but papers providing evidence (of varying quality) of the harm done by practices like the Church’s are plentiful. Stephen C’s roundups give you a flavor, but keep in mind those are only the ones that talk about the Church itself. Setting aside the evidence, humans are wired to agree with their community so they fit in. Some members do just fine despite all this; others don’t.

    The R1s indeed tend to set the agenda for the rest of academia, in part because we train so many of the faculty. (A lot of BYU professors are former members of my ward.) But at an R1, both size and power flow from research grant money, and the social sciences and humanities don’t get much of that. So the part of the university that’s hostile to the Church is fairly small.

    Yes, HR policies tend to reflect the propositions I started with. If someone can’t stand to work alongside a trans person, an out-and-proud homosexual, or a woman, academia is probably not for them. But I could send them a collection of quotes and speeches from President Oaks suggesting they should have more of a live-and-let-live attitude and be grateful we live in a pluralistic society. The same pluralism (or religious freedom, if you prefer) that lets them live the life they choose lets us live our faith even when we lose culture wars.

    Gender and sexuality are not the only issues where parts of the academy disagree with the church, though they’re by far the biggest. We’ve seen on the blog recently how anti-colonialist thought would recast the pioneers as villains, but that’s pretty niche. Economics is interesting in that it leans right rather than left. Studies have suggested that studying economics tends to make people more accepting of economic inequality, and if we take our scriptures seriously (D&C 70:14, for example, or 104:16), that’s a problem. But given Church culture, I don’t think many economists see a conflict between their field and the Church. (My degrees are in Economics, though in practice I’m basically a free-range social science data geek.)

  13. For those who want to test this historical hypothesis, President Ernest Wilkinson had BYU publish an annual *Directory of Members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Higher Education and School Administration* between the mid-1950s and the mid-1960s. It might provide a window into how LDS members spread throughout academia and across the U.S. during a period of growth for both the church and higher education.

  14. Stephen C! “My great-grandfather was a U of Chicago Zoology PhD”
    I can’t help but be interested in this story, and any journals or correspondence that might have stuck around decades later :)

  15. I dug back into the sources, and I found it, worth quoting in full since it’s apropos to the OP and the long history of the LDS academic grad student pipeline. His name was Peter P. Peterson, and his wife Hazel Parkinson Peterson wrote an autobiography. Also, it looks like I made a mistake, he taught Zoology at BYU College in Logan (an early Utah State?), but got his PhD at U Chicago in chemistry. I’ll send you the PDF.

    “In 1909, after Peter received his long awaited PhD in chemistry, we moved to Madison, Wisconsin, where he became a research fellow in soils. We spent many highly enjoyable years there, meeting many Utah people with whom we became fast friends…While at Madison, Peter was offered a position as head of the Department of Soils at the University of Idaho at Moscow. He debated a long time the pros and cons of leaving a nationally regarded institution, such as the University of Wisconsin, when he had a most promising future, for the smaller and exclusively State University of Moscow. But there were other factors, principally the idea of getting out West and closer to the Church once more, that finally decided us. Peter’s associates at Wisconsin tried to talk him out of it, saying he was just getting to a place where his ability and knowledge enhanced his value. They added that his reason for leaving was the one for which they were slow to employ Mormon teachers because they all seemed to pull up stakes before too long and return to their people.”

  16. Well, well, well…Stephen C, I’m officially adding your great-grandfather to my list of BYU professors who are former members of my ward, even if it’s the wrong BYU and I’m not entirely sure even a predecessor branch existed in 1909!

    I grew up watching my Dad try to make space LDS evolutionists (he was a microbiology professor before going into industry). The stake had him give firesides and youth conference presentations where he’d insist that just because you found the evidence for evolution compelling didn’t mean you had to reject your faith in the gospel, even though Elder McConkie was saying exactly the opposite at the same time. Just about every department at a university was hostile to the Joseph Fielding Smith/Bruce R. McConkie worldview, and I think a lot of members’ thinking about universities is a legacy of that.

  17. Lol, well, hopefully my great-grandfather contributing to the stereotype that Mormons just want to get a degree so they can move back to Utah hasn’t hurt your career;)

  18. OK, RLD, apparently I need to have a research chat with you too :)

  19. Jonathan,

    Regarding the MBA pipeline, there area number of factors. Chief among them is that the MBA is simply less valuable and marketable than it was 10-15 years ago. Corporate America has shifted its hiring strategy away from going to campus and recruiting MBAs. There could be BYU specific factors, like not wanting to hire from a religious school, but I’m not sure, the trend is broader than BYU.

    Regarding the PNW, it’s so expensive to live here. The number of BYU graduates who can move to the PNW, find a job and support a young family can’t be large.

    The church in the Seattle Metro is definitely shrinking. A lot of it is people moving away but perhaps a bigger factor is few are moving TO this area. Where are the younger versions of my family?

  20. Michael, thanks for the explanation. Every field has its own quirks, and I’m definitely not caught up with what’s going on with MBAs these days.

    But having grown up in Southern California, I understand what you’re seeing in the PNW. 50 years of anti-growth policies made it difficult for a lot of families to stay in the area.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.