The Heavenly Lawsuit: Dan McClellan on the Original Meaning of Psalm 82

Because we believe in human exaltation, Latter-day Saints are usually familiar with Psalm 82:6, where the psalmist declares, “I have said, Ye are gods.” We frequently cite this verse, along with Christ’s quotation of it in John 10, as biblical evidence of our divine potential. However, when we read this text through the lens of the ancient Near East, a very different—but equally fascinating—theological drama emerges. A compelling new interview over at the Latter-day Saint history blog, From the Desk, features biblical scholar Dan McClellan, who breaks down the historical context of Psalm 82. McClellan explains that the psalm was originally written not as a manual on human progression, but as a heavenly lawsuit against the patron deities of foreign nations, illustrating how the ancient Israelites used this courtroom scene to process the trauma of the Babylonian exile and universalize the authority of YHWH.

Who Are the Gods in Psalm 82?

The Divine Council and the Indictment

To understand Psalm 82, readers must step into the ancient Israelite worldview, which envisioned a divine council of lesser deities who governed the various nations of the earth under the supreme sovereignty of YHWH. McClellan notes that the psalm is structured as a legal proceeding within this heavenly court.

I would say Psalm 82 is a type of lawsuit being argued in a heavenly court. In this lawsuit, the God of Israel accuses the other deities of the various nations of the earth of neglecting their duties as national deities.

Specifically, these patron gods are indicted for failing to protect the poor and needy and for allowing the social and cosmic order to collapse, culminating in the Babylonian exile of Judah.

De-deification as Punishment

Because these lesser gods failed in their administrative duties, YHWH issues a devastating sentence: they will lose their immortality.

To deprive them of their immortality is to de-deify them, or render them mortal and no longer divine.

By stripping these deities of their godhood, their seats on the divine council are vacated. The psalmist then petitions YHWH to rise up and inherit all the nations Himself, essentially taking over the empty seats and consolidating all divine authority.

The Problem of Geography

Why did the psalmist need to write this heavenly takeover? McClellan explains that in the ancient world, deities were strictly bound to their specific geographic territories.

It’s also why David complained to Saul that Saul’s men were driving him out of “YHWH’s inheritance,” effectively telling him, “go worship other gods.” The exiled Judahites also rhetorically ask, “Who can sing the song of YHWH in a foreign land?

When the Israelites were carried away captive into Babylon, they faced a theological crisis: they were no longer in YHWH’s territory. By writing a psalm where YHWH deposes the gods of Babylon and all other nations, the author cleverly “universalizes God’s authority, allowing Him to be worshipped and active in all the nations of the earth rather than in Israel alone.”

Jesus and the Rabbinic Tradition

If the original context of Psalm 82 was about a pantheon of ancient national deities, why did Jesus quote it in the New Testament to defend His own divinity and apply it to mortal men? McClellan points out that the interpretation of the text evolved over the centuries.

Jesus’s view of Psalm 82 likely reflects his endorsement of an interpretation found in later Rabbinic literature, which understands the “gods” of Psalm 82 to be the Israelites at Sinai.

By the first century, Jewish tradition had reimagined the “gods” of the psalm as human beings who received the law, a tradition Jesus seamlessly leveraged during His mortal ministry to turn back a charge of blasphemy.

In the Latter-day Saint tradition, B. H. Roberts quoted this exchange in the New Testament, noting that “when Jesus was accused of making himself God, he did not deny the charge; but on the contrary, called their attention to the fact that God in the law he had given to Israel had said to some of them—’Ye are Gods, and all of you are children of the Most High.’” (Cited in Chad Nielsen, A Beginner’s Guide to B. H. Roberts: Excerpts from the Writings of B. H. Roberts [Deseret Merlin Press, 2025], 123.) Along those lines, McClellan observed, “I think Latter-day Saints commonly understand Psalm 82 through the lens of John 10. It affirms the notion that humans are children of God and therefore have the seed of divinity within them. This is why Psalm 82:6 has so long been one of the cross-references published with the hymn, ‘I Am A Child of God.’”


For more of McClellan’s insights on how this psalm bridges the gap between ancient polytheistic frameworks and later monotheism, the structure of ancient lamentations, and the theological blame placed on patron deities, head on over to the Latter-day Saint history blog, From the Desk, to read the full interview about the gods in Psalm 82.

While you’re there, check out the new Joseph F. Smith Quotes page!


Comments

11 responses to “The Heavenly Lawsuit: Dan McClellan on the Original Meaning of Psalm 82”

  1. Not a Cougar

    Dan’s awesome, and his thoughts on the heavenly council (and a bunch of other biblical issues) are truly fascinating. That said, there’s a reason that, by his own admission, his bishop and stake president don’t let him anywhere near an adult Sunday School class. Pretty much none of what he writes and lectures about fits into the Church’s Gospel narrative. The idea of an ancient Canaanite council headed by El with Yahweh (Jehovah) simply being one of several of El’s godly offspring really doesn’t fit with the Church’s teachings on premortal life and the arrangement of the Godhead (just to name one example). The Bible contains a lot of hints that the narrative of Israelites who are devoted (if not always) faithful to Yahweh is vastly oversimplified if not downright wrong. Regardless definitely listen to Dan’s Data Over Dogma podcast.

  2. Stephen C

    I don’t know; Dr. McClellan wouldn’t see it as some sort of hit for Latter-day Saint claims, but I always thought that the idea that El is the “Heavenly Father” and chief God to YHWH fits into our narrative. Not perfectly of course, but it’s one of those things where our framework comports with higher criticism better than traditional Christianity’s.

  3. jader3rd

    I thought that all of the Psalms were written during the time of David and Solomon. Is that not the case?
    This year, I noticed that for Abraham the land the Canaan was setup to be YHWH’s land. But then when Moses was being visited on Mt. Sinai, YHWH said that he was God over all lands. A fact that was very mind expanding for Moses. I think it’s an interesting point that needs more attention when studying Genesis and Exodus.

  4. rogerdhansen

    “Ye are Gods” is an excellent example of “proof texting.” It’s something that is done all too often in the Church.

  5. There’s no doubt that Canaanite religion had a big impact on early Israelite religion, just as Neoplatonic philosophy had a big impact on early Christianity. Many scholars, including some people of faith, see Israelite religion as an outgrowth of Canaanite religion. Those of faith might describe it as a gradual revelation of God, moving from local to universal, judgmental to loving, etc. We would see Canaanite influence as corrupting truth that had been previously received by revelation. Dr. McClellan’s read on Psalm 82 could fit either model, so I have no idea where he stands.

    (No, not all the psalms are from the time of David and Solomon. See Psalm 137, for instance.)

    Mix the true gospel with Neoplatonism, and Jehovah becomes a god without body, parts, and passions. Mix the true gospel with Canaanite religion, and Jehovah becomes one of the seventy sons of El and Asherah, each with their own land and people, meeting together in a council. What makes things interesting is that. while in their zeal to reject Canaanite gods the Israelites declared that Jehovah is the only God, we believe that Jehovah does indeed have a divine Father, most of us believe he has a divine Mother, and we believe that he did meet in a divine council at least once. So Canaanite religion preserved some truths that were later lost, perhaps because it was an even more corrupted version of the original true gospel. The Israelites threw out the baby with the bathwater.

    The really provocative question is whether we can identify our Heavenly Mother with Asherah, and whether at least some of the ancient Israelite worship of Asherah had divine approval. I’ll answer that with a definitive “I don’t know.”

  6. Not a Cougar

    Stephen, to your point about El and Yaweh, I guess so, kinda, sorta, not really? If we were to “Venn diagram” your connection, we have two ovals with one representing our understanding of God the Father and Jesus Christ and the other is the general consensus of historians on El amd Yaweh. The overlap is a few square inches where we have a father-son deity relationship and in the remaining area of the El-Yahweh oval you could park a couple of metaphorical 747s’ worth of historical odds and ends like, for example, “the rest of the heavenly council,” an a historical Exodus, and the monolatry of Israel for Yahweh being a late development in the kingdom of Judah rather than a foundational characteristic of a the predecessor united Kingdom under David.

  7. I meant to give an example: the Canaanite god of death, Mot, is described as having an insatiable appetite. Death swallows up everything. So when Paul, following Isaiah, says that thanks to Christ, “Death is swallowed up in victory,” he’s drawing on and subverting imagery from Canaanite religion.

  8. Alex Arnold on his channel, Moroni’s Standard, provides a masterful weaving of Psalm 82, the Divine Council, and First Temple theology.

  9. Not a Cougar

    RLD, are you suggesting Paul was knowingly drawing on Canaanite religion in writing his epistle or was he simply quoting Isaiah? Those are two very different things, and I think the latter is far, far more likely than the former. And if it’s the latter, why should Paul get any credit for unknowingly and thus unintentionally making a reference to Canaanite religion?

  10. Certainly Paul was quoting Isaiah. But in Isaiah the quote is part of a laundry list of good things that the Lord will do for his people, and the meaning is unclear. Paul uses it as part of a discourse on the resurrection, where the image of a god of death who swallows up everything being swallowed up by Christ’s victory is directly relevant.

    It’s possible that he was just quoting Isaiah without having any idea what Isaiah was referring to. Or maybe he was familiar with the image of death swallowing things without knowing its origin. But the relevance of the reference makes me think it’s more likely he understood it–chronologically he was a lot closer to actual worshippers of Mot than to us. That’s not to say he believed Mot actually existed, but it was part of his cultural vocabulary the way Greek and Roman gods are part of ours.

    Even if it was just a quote, I find it fascinating that Canaanite religion shows up in the New Testament at all.

  11. Michael Heiser claims that the elohim in Psalm 82 are the “sons of God.” And I think it’s interesting that when we read how that psalm is quoted in John 10 the element that causes one to be divine is the reception of the word. Now there’s a lot that could be said about what that might mean–even so, I think the long and short of it is–there is a way in which mortal beings may become “divinized.” And that’s by becoming sanctified and then being admitted into the divine council–as was Isaiah.

    There’s been no shortage of crazy ideas about who the sons of God were in early writings. The writings of Enoch portray them as fallen angels–you know the story. Even so, I’m of the opinion that what has caused so much confusion about their identity is a hermeneutical problem more than anything else. And it is the restoration scriptures that help us to understand how to interpret references to the “sons of God.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.