The “Radical” 1948 Hymnal: How We Got Our Solemn Sound

With a new, global hymnbook on the horizon, Latter-day Saints are currently buzzing about what will be added and what might be lost. We tend to view the current “green book” (1985) as the definitive standard of our musical worship, but in reality, the solemn, organ-centric sound we associate with Sacrament meeting is a relatively recent invention—and one man is largely responsible for it. In a fascinating new interview over at the Latter-day Saint history blog, From the Desk, biographer Shelby Fisher introduces us to Tracy Y. Cannon, the tabernacle organist and committee chair who, in 1948, radically steered the Church away from its pioneer folk roots and toward the “dignified, refined” aesthetic of the Protestant mainstream.

How Did Tracy Y. Cannon Shape Latter-day Saint Hymnbooks?

The “Homegrown” Failure of 1927

Fisher explains that before Cannon fully took the reins, the Church’s musical identity was somewhat chaotic. The 1927 hymnal attempted to unify the Saints. Still, it leaned heavily on “homegrown talent” and music for choirs rather than congregations (as might be expected from a committee composed mostly of Tabernacle Choir staff). The result? A collection of texts that were often “difficult to sing and poorly executed.”

The General Music Committee was not necessarily discerning with the 1927 hymnal. Many of the texts they collected were difficult to sing …

Many bishops balked at the cost … and simply ignored the committee’s suggestion to purchase the new hymnal. Instead, they continued working with whatever books they had been using [like the Songs of Zion].

(As a side note, the 1927 hymnal was the original green hymnal, and some anecdotes I’ve heard indicate that the 1985 hymnal was green because of it.)

The Radical Pivot of 1948

The most significant turning point came with the 1948 hymnal. Under Cannon’s leadership, the committee made a “radical decision” to stop looking inward for talent and start looking outward.

This was in direct opposition to the approach they took in 1927 when they sought to cultivate “homegrown talent.”

The impulse to look to the musical traditions of other denominations can be traced directly to both Tracy Cannon and Alexander Schreiner … Both men had studied in Europe and gained an appreciation for the refined, harmonic elegance of the Lutheran and Anglican traditions.

This is why our current hymnal feels so “classical.” Cannon wanted to professionalize the liturgy, moving the Saints away from bouncy Sunday School ditties toward the majesty of Bach and Handel. He effectively standardized the organ as the musical voice of the Church. A lot of our current hymnody is derived from this 1948/1950 hymnal.

The End of an Era?

Interestingly, Fisher suggests that the upcoming hymnbook might signal the waning of Cannon’s influence. While Cannon championed the organ, the new collection includes “fluid pianistic textures” and even guitar chords, embracing a diversity of musical styles that Cannon likely would have resisted.


For more on Cannon’s legacy, the “unsingable” hymns of the past, and how a rural schoolteacher named Leroy Robertson got his big break for $25, head on over to the Latter-day Saint history blog, From the Desk, to read the full interview about Tracy Y. Cannon with Shelby Fisher.

While you’re there, check out the updated Brigham Young page!


Comments

3 responses to “The “Radical” 1948 Hymnal: How We Got Our Solemn Sound”

  1. My (very uninformed) guess is that the new hymnbook will reflect not so much a waning of the organ focus, but a continued effort to stay in contact with broader musical trends in Christianity and a widened international perspective. Some places are better served with guitar notation than organ music (but you can’t draw the boundaries just by looking at a map – you really do have to consult with people on the ground).

  2. Seems to me that the new hymnbook represents Tracy Y. Cannon’s final victory over the notion that the one true church must be the source of the one true music (“the songs of Zion”). I’m all in favor of using the best music we can find (“best” defined in terms of accomplishing the purposes we assign to music) while also supporting our own composers, and so far so good.

    But it goes further by suggesting that there is no one true style of sacred music, or even genre, and I am curious what Cannon would think of that. A congregation could now sing “A Mighty Fortress is Our God” followed by “His Eye is On the Sparrow,” or “Our Savior’s Love” followed by “This Little Light of Mine.” Musically, that’s a lot to ask. And based on how “This Little Light of Mine” went in our stake conference yesterday, musically we’re not really up to it yet. I’m sure it will get better in time. But hymns can accomplish their purpose even if the congregation still sings everything with the same “solemn sound.”

  3. John Mansfield

    My mother-in-law, now 85 years old, grew up in a ward where Tracy Cannon was not only a Tabernacle organist but also a ward organist. I learned this when I mentioned one of his hymns to her a couple years ago, and she let me know her fondness for his hymns and playing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.