What Can We Learn from Visions of Glory?

Kendall Buchanan is a Provo business owner with a wife and six kids, and a passion for religious scholarship, especially Mormonism.

Visions of Glory is a side-effect of our spiritually vibrant Mormon culture. Part 1 of a three-part series discussing the book and its significance.

Ever since Visions of Glory was spotted in a photo with Lori Daybell lounging by a pool, the book has taken on a villainous reputation for inspiring a string of visionary Mormon criminals residing in Utah. The 1980s gave us Mark Hoffman and the Lafferty brothers. The 2020s will be remembered for Hildebrant-Franke, the Daybells, and (crossing my fingers) Tim Ballard.

A year ago I realized that the chattering classes debating Visions of Glory probably hadn’t read it. The book is a millenarian work about the spirit world and the end-of-times; as you can imagine, it is a nutty read. It’s also a smashing success for an LDS publication. What surprised me when I read it for myself, however, was how familiar it felt.

A recent Times & Seasons post,Spiritual Experiences Going Off the Rails, by Stephen Fleming, a friend of mine, inspired this three-part series. I pinged Stephen as this is an amateur fascination of mine—I’m taken by claims to odd spiritual manifestations; and I believe their stories are inseparable from our collective Mormon experience.

For Latter-day Saints who value authority and respectability, Visions of Glory is a fraud that led vulnerable Church members away from true doctrine. Critics of the Church, meanwhile, gawk at the book’s religious fanaticism, calling it indicative of Mormon gullibility.

I argue that outgrowths like Visions of Glory represent an integral byproduct of our otherwise laudable and spiritually vibrant Mormon culture. I don’t defend the book, but I do say that the impulse that created it is inseparable from the intensity of our inner spiritual lives.

Written by John Pontius, Visions of Glory is a kind of memoir told by Pontius’ intimate friend, “Spencer”. Pontius begins by attempting to establish credibility with his audience—Spencer had kept his visions within the revelatory guardrails taught by Church leaders, holding them secret for 40 years; he wasn’t speaking for the Church; and when the Spirit finally impressed him to share the visions with a member of the Quorum of the Twelve, the General Authority assured him they were from God.

The book is compelling because it is specific. Spencer’s visions bring readers in on the secrets of the spirit world and predict the end of the world in high fidelity. (Spoiler: An earthquake creates a canyon running from California to Texas!)

These visions are triggered by a series of “post-death” experiences—which happen oddly often. (Note: “post” emphasizes that he was definitely dead, not just “near” dead.) Lots of evidence substantiates near-death experiences, and therefore they are a salient primer for Latter-day Saint readers. Near-death experiences are overwhelmingly positive, usually involve meeting deceased loved ones, and often validate our belief that the other side resembles the world we live in.

Still, reading it myself was sort of a letdown. I’d expected critics to have identified something truly nefarious—Mormon Stories attempted a deep dive into the book and their conclusions won’t surprise you. Rather, the book’s themes derive from speculative, but heartfelt and widely-held, Mormon beliefs.

Spencer died for the first time at the age of thirty-three following a series of kidney infections which required a special kind of X-ray. During the procedure he slipped from the doctor’s hands, his spirit collapsing through the hospital bed. Like others who have passed on, Spencer became a detached observer of his physical surroundings.

Unlike others, Spencer then wandered the halls of the hospital. He perceived the medical workers’ souls, discerning “without judgment” between the righteous and the unrighteous. Like Mormon prophets before him, the visions gave him sight forwards and backwards. He witnessed his biological father leaving his mother and gazed on as she wrestled with the decision to abort him.

Spencer laces his stories with doctrinal expansions and inspirational asides that give his visions spiritual authority: “We spend so much time entertaining and pleasing ourselves that we do not fully realize how important every moment and every interaction truly is to God.”

He admits he doesn’t always understand what he’s shown. Following his second death while on vacation in Tahiti, he sees a horrific “history of the spiritual and non-spiritual practices of the ancient Tahitians” as they become cannibals.

As the book progresses, the visions tackle grander and more sweeping themes, eventually encompassing the Millennium and the end of the world, carefully keeping his visions plausible within Mormon prophecy. The righteous possess seer stones, and Zion floods the earth.

Like other millenarian works, Spencer’s stories are unsurprisingly solipsistic—the book casts Latter-day Saints, Salt Lake City, and even humdrum landmarks like the Church Office Building as prominent actors on a world stage: “Because of the collapse of civil authority, the Church had become the only organized group of people remaining.”

In the end, Christ returns to meet those preparing for Him. Spencer warns that some people will continue to deny the gospel. Some critics have accused Spencer and Pontius of behaving like scam artists, deliberately using sensational material to dupe the credulous. But to what end?

In 2014, Thomas Harrison, “Spencer”, disclosed his identity in a public apology to address criticisms he was receiving within the Church. He explained his deep reluctance to share his experiences, but after reading President Thomas S. Monson’s encouragement to share “testimonies and special sacred experiences” Pontius prevailed with a book.

Visions of Glory sold hundreds of thousands of copies, making it one of the most successful Latter-day Saint books ever printed, on par with The Infinite Atonement and Believing Christ.[1] Harrison is still around, and has had plenty of time to reflect on the book’s influence. Pontius, for his part, never saw the book’s success—he died in 2012, two weeks after the book was published.

In 2023 his wife launched a website to combat the negative attention the book drew in the wake of the Daybell murders. A prominent review says, “I’m a bit perturbed by the charges levied against Brother Pontius and “Spencer” as they are the complete opposite to my experience… Most of the time reading it I felt a very strong spirit, testifying to me of its truth.”

The book is utterly sensational. It’s apocalyptic and batty. Yet I have a measure of sympathy for its motivations. It purports to uncover the “mysteries” that tug at us as Latter-day Saints—those simply seeking to better understand where we came from and where we’re going.

(Part 2 will briefly explore Mormonism’s heritage of mystery-seeking.)

[1] Book sales are hard to estimate, but Pontius’ website boasts over 200,000 copies sold. Few LDS books exceed even 10,000.


Comments

13 responses to “What Can We Learn from Visions of Glory?”

  1. Stephen Fleming

    Thanks for this, Kendall. Very good point about such experiences and discussion being an important part of Mormonism. Of course, the accusation is that VISIONS OF GLORY is connected to Daybell’s, Hildebrandt’s, and Tim Ballard’s wacky/criminal behaviors. Do you have any thoughts on that?

    And that brings up the larger issue of guardrails. What is the balance between encouraging the good stuff and reining in the bad stuff? Is such a line even possible to draw?

  2. I have read the book at least twice. I dont see the connection that the book is the problem with or the cause of the “mormon criminals” and what they have done if that is how you (OP) feel. Full disclosure, I dont follow that stuff at all so I am not aware of any direct link that may be out there. Looking forward to others views on this connection.

    Having experienced an NDE before they were even called that, I am more open to the unusual so this book did not seem to me a “fraud” and leading members away from “church doctrine.”

    I am aware that lots of “traditional” members believe that only a “prophet” would have access to this type of experience, but that is mormon doctrine. I am aware that others feel that Bro. Harrison is “prophesying” since he speaks of future events, a clear no-no for us lowly member level types. To me, he is just sharing what he experienced. What he saw. He is not saying, thus sayeth the Lord this will happen. He believes his experiences and is sharing them. Readers will of course have to decide what to think.

    I dont know Bro. Harrison so he could be a fraudulent scoundrel who has a pretty good imagination.

    Looking forward to this series! Thanks for posting.

  3. Thanks for the write-up, Kendall. I think some of the details you shared from the book play into why it resonates with Mormons: Canyon from CA to TX? That sounds a lot like the destruction in 3 Nephi 10. Mom struggled with abortion decision? Every Mormon knows that abortion is an abomination and that act would have deprived us of this work of prophecy. Cannibalistic Tahitians? Sounds a lot like bloodthirsty Lamanites at the end of the BoM.

    I don’t think VoG directly incited the Mormon criminals you mentioned to commit evil acts. But I do think it may have given them the encouragement to make visionary claims and accept followers who believed them. I can certainly imagine Chad Daybell reading VoG and thinking, “If Pontius can experience and share these things, then why not me?” But just as some men “stand on the shoulders of giants who can’t before” the Daybell types push past the guardrails that constrained Pontius and left the reservation.

    It kinda reminds me of Nauvoo Era Joseph Smith. Once your followers fervently believe whatever you say (and maybe you start to believe in your own divinity), the rules no longer apply and you can do whatever you want until your eventual reckoning with the law.

    Looking forward to Part 2!

  4. Stephen Fleming

    Davek, encouragement to make visionary claims has been central to Christianity for 2000 years and in Mormonism since 1830. That’s ubiquitous and nothing new with Visions of Glory (VG).

    I’d heard that VG’s intense and specific apocalypticism with very vivid and of a very tangible war with evil spirits and beings was a thread that tied these movements together.

  5. Kendall Buchanan

    Sussing out specific visions that could have inspired Daybell/Hildebrant/Ballard is beyond my pay grade, especially given how little I know about DHB’s worldviews. But I can speculate!

    Harrison—to his credit—was not creating a movement. He numbered himself as one of the 144,000 from Revelations; the book, however, made a bigger splash than he was expecting, and he seemed sincerely embarrassed that local church leaders frowned on it.

    As I point out, his visions align with expectations Latter-day Saints have about New Jerusalem, the Millennium, and changes to the earth when it is “rolled together as a scroll”. Pontius worked hard to position Harrison’s visions solidly within pre-existing Mormon beliefs.

    My guess is that DHB found common cause with Spencer as they were forming their own visionary identities. Hildebrant was preparing for some cataclysm, and Ballard was getting ready to be the President. The clearest connection I know of is that the Daybells imagined they possessed the power to discern people’s spirits, which justified some of their murders. “Spencer” is able to make these discernments during one of his NDEs.

    Problem is, Latter-day Saints speak of perceiving others’ “countenances” all the time! So you can see how pushing Harrison into DHB’s camp is extreme.

    Steve, you asked about guardrails: I plan to address that in a later post.

  6. I haven’t read it, but I was expecting Visions of Glory to be somehow more lurid. It actually sounds more like afterlife narratives that have been circulating for 1000 years or so.

  7. Non-polygamous LDS Fundamentalism is a real thing, from Julie Rowe to Hannah Stoddard at the Joseph Smith Foundation. There is a real political/cultural schism going on in the Church. It became blazingly apparent during Covid, when the First Presidency was ignored and even ridiculed regarding masking and vaccinations. There is a schism on the political/cultural left, but it doesn’t really shake the foundations like the one on the Right.

  8. Stephen Fleming

    It sounds to me like the issue with Daybell, Hildebrandt, and Ballard was more about DHB having some odd religious inclinations and using VG to head in odd directions. Still makes me wonder what’s up with DHB.

  9. I know many people who read the book and believed every word of it. They were not inspired to abuse or murder others. They were inspired to make extremely stupid financial decisions based on the claims in the book.

    The book undeniably caused great harm to many.

  10. Texasabuelo,
    Plenty of Latter-day Saints are “standing alone” by following cultural and political extremists who criticize the First Prrsidency…. right out of the church.

  11. As Kendall is a guest here, I removed a comment that was far off topic. Then I did the same for additional comments on other posts that likewise missed the point by a mile. Please, read carefully and try to keep comments relevant.

  12. Anyways, the discussion here about religious sensationalism and violence was anticipated a few decades ago in a scholarly dispute about medieval apocalypticism. One view frequently expressed since the 1950s if not earlier held that millennarianism inspired violence, and you’ll still come across people repeating this idea. But the outcome of the scholarly dispute was to overturn this idea: instead of causing violence, people used various aspects of apocalypticism to make sense of their lives and the events they had experienced.

  13. Last Lemming

    On the one hand, I am embarrassed that this book was out there for 14 years while I was oblivious to its existence.

    On the other hand, I count myself lucky to have been so oblivious.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.