Jesus in Recent Latter-day Saint Art

At the Mormon History Association conference this weekend, Anthony Sweat shared a funny story during his presentation on “A White Jesus and a Global Church.”  Apparently there were some individuals who were visiting BYU from Saudi Arabia to observe teaching at the institution.  During a class that Dr. Sweat was teaching, the Saudis saw a print of the famous Del Parson Jesus the Christ painting.  They asked through an interpreter who the painting was depicting.  Dr. Sweat explained that it was Jesus, and the Saudis busted up laughing and started chattering.  Confused, Sweat asked the interpreter what they were saying and the interpreter explained that they were laughing about Jesus being portrayed as a white American mountain man.  Dr. Sweat asked them about what they thought Jesus looked like and they responded that he probably looked like them, which probably isn’t far from the truth.  In his presentation, Anthony Sweat went on to discuss the history of how Jesus has been portrayed and ultimately made the point that the traditional European iconography of Jesus as European in appearance is well-established and doesn’t need to go away, but that there does need to be more diversity in depictions of Jesus available for a global church.

I’m not going to rehash the whole issue of Jesus’s complexion again, but I am interested in some of the artwork that has been produced in the Church in recent years that provide a different vision of Jesus.  There are a few paintings that gained attention in the bloggernacle a few years ago, such as Emile Wilson’s “The Last Supper”, “Christ Praying in Gethsemane”, and “Christ on the Cross” and then Sopheap Nhem’s “Early Morning with the Savior”.  When visiting the Church History Museum recently to see the artwork presented in the current International Art Competition, I was excited to see several diverse depictions of Jesus in art, notably including Michelle Franzoni Thorley’s “Making Space For Us”, Arawn Billings’s “Jesus and the Woman Accused”, Emma Taylor’s “Together in Christ”, and Anthony Sweat’s “Jesus of Nazareth”.  At the MHA conference, Anthony Sweat also talked about and shared images of some other recent works of art depicting Jesus as non-white, such as Rose Datoc Dall’s “New Images of Christ” series, Esther Hi’ilani Candari’s “This Bitter Cup”, and some of Mark Mabry’s recent additions to his “Reflections of Christ” photographs.  More and more, artwork depicting Jesus in ways that disrupt the established European iconography of portraying Jesus as Caucasian is developing a presence in Latter-day Saint artwork.

Part of this seems to be a developing trend over the last decade as the Church has become more diverse and the internet is providing outlets for more artists (and historians) to present their works to a broader audience.  For example, at a 2019 Temple Art Seminar, it was communicated that artists thinking about portraying Jesus should not only be looking at “prior LDS depictions in painting, photography, and film, but largely looking to scriptural and scholarly evidences to provide accuracy where possible.  Part of that accuracy includes moving away from a more Caucasian depiction of Christ in favor of a depiction closer to what a 1st century man from Jerusalem might look like.  A variety of depictions from various artists allows patrons to connect with different representations of Christ and helps avoid any depictions becoming ‘canonized'” (“Temple Art Seminar Summary,” June 12, 2019, p. 2-3). While I understood that this summary document isn’t an official Church publication, it does corresponds to a broader trend in Christianity to depict Jesus more accurately, such as the AI-photograph-analysis-based image of what Jesus may have looked like produced by Bas Uterwijk or the model of a Galilean man created by Richard Neave in 2001 based on anthropological evidence.

Sweat also shared that some of the recent depictions of Christ as a non-European man by Latter-day Saint artists were catalyzed by the racial reckoning in 2020 that was sparked by the killing of George Floyd.  A few of the notable artists in the Latter-day Saint community had discussions together over Zoom in the immediate aftermath of that event about depictions of Jesus.  This seemed to be part of the inspiration for Anthony Sweat’s “Jesus of Nazareth”, in which he put a lot of time and effort into researching what a 1st century man from Jerusalem might look like and using that as the basis of his depiction.

For many of us who have grown up consuming images of Jesus as white, these alternative visions of Jesus’s appearances do take some getting used to.  Sweat mentioned that when he dropped off his painting for the art competition, the folks who received the painting asked who it was portraying because it fell outside of the standard iconography of Jesus, making it less recognizable as Jesus.  To me, though, this is an exciting direction to move in (even though I love the paintings of Jesus I grew up with), because it is more accurate and less Euro-American-centric for a religion that is trying to grow beyond its white-mountain-man-American origins.

6 comments for “Jesus in Recent Latter-day Saint Art

  1. I do not like portrait paintings of Jesus — I really don’t. I also don’t like paintings depicting imaginary settings. I much prefer paintings that illustrate stories straight from the scriptures. As to His complexion, I have seen and I appreciate these story paintings with Jesus looking like the locals — old Chinese art and iconography might show Jesus and others looking Chinese and wearing Chinese clothing and in a Chinese location. I am also okay with old European art and iconography that does the same thing. Really, what else could they have done?

    But that is old art. I am okay with new artists trying to be more “realistic,” and I hope their work can be accepted. But I don’t like portraits.

  2. JJ – I feel the same.
    I remember as a child watching the Cecil B De Mille biblical movies where it was viewed as lacking sanctity to show Jesus’ face.
    I particularly dislike the stills taken from the more recent Bible videos depicting the Saviour. Whilst the videos are excellently produced the stills are in so common usage in church publications that we seem to be worshipping an actor.

  3. You’ve both got a point. There’s a reason for why David O. McKay told Arnold Friberg to not paint Christ in his Book of Mormon scenes (the bodybuilder Jesus in the Americas that he did do came later). He told him that “the finite cannot conceive of the infinite.”

  4. I love the old and the new. I hope that as western artists try to reimagine Christ, and artists of other cultures continue to depict Him in their own images, too, there will be room for all in our hearts and on our walls. There is no more need to toss Del Parson’s Jesus than there is to toss those depicting Him as Chinese. Both are inaccurate, yet both are created out of devotion- that should be worth at least as much as historical accuracy about a figure no one in this modern age can confirm or deny is correct.

  5. There’s certainly a place for depicting Jesus within any kind of cultural context, including the white European one. But when we insist that these depictions *are* what Jesus is like (becoming less common, in my experience) or when the Church releases a short list of approved artwork of the Savior for chapels all over the world that consists exclusively of the white European Jesus, it moves beyond seeing Jesus in our cultural context into the realm of imperialism. I hope the list of approved artwork grows to include more of the historical and diverse portrayals of Jesus cited in this post.

  6. I’m kind of at a loss as to what Jesus really looked like, and maybe that’s the point. But the artwork for me is about depicting the spirit of Christ. That is, I feel I can tell if the artist is trying to build him up or tear him down by the depiction, and that is my basis for the aesthetics of the piece. That has nothing to do with the race or cultural trappings he is depicted in–whether he is supposed to look like white people, people of color, or some other culture, or some attempt to match the historical Jesus. I’m glad to see the church embrace some of that diversity. I also think of the way that Joseph apparently saw him: as a resurrected, glorified being. Our attempts to depict that are, quite frankly, terrible because they are alien to us and have no frame of reference. I keep wondering if we’ll see him like that or if we’ll have the kind of “poor wayfaring man of grief” type of encounter when we first see him and we’ll have to recognize him from how we feel and not from what we see.

Charitable Comments Welcome. Please follow our comment policy

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.