Your Reactions to Church Yesterday, 2/1

While we claim that Church is worship, I think Church members often talk about Church like it is entertainment. I hear things like “I got bored”, “I didn’t like that talk,” “What they said was wrong,” etc. If you are worshiping God at Church, why do these questions matter? Is the presentation, good or bad, why you came to Church? If you are worshiping, why would you allow the inabilities of speakers or teachers keep you from that?

The simplest model of communication consists of a speaker, a listener and a message. But when we apply this to worship, is it different? Where does God fit in that model? Is he the speaker? If so, how is he communicating and what is the message?

Sometimes, we hear that God speaks through others, if so, are we listening to that? If we are disappointed because we are expecting to be entertained, are we letting that disappointment keep us from hearing God’s messages?

Given this idea, how did you react to Church yesterday? What did you notice? Did you end up thinking differently? Do you think your reactions were what they should be? Were they looking for what God had to tell you? Did your reactions make things better?

This is the latest invitation for reactions to local meetings, continuing the spirit of my post on September 25th about how we receive what happens in Church meetings—sermons, lessons and anything else—and enter a conversation with them, magnifying what was said or adding what we think. In these posts I’m asking us all to think about how we listen and receive what happens at Church. If we only listen for mistakes, or things that bother us, what does that say about us? Is it most important to criticize others? Or to try to change ourselves?

The point here is that no matter how poorly prepared the speaker or teacher is, or no matter how what happens triggers us, or is objectively or doctrinally wrong, we can still find elements in what is said and what happens that inspires and edifies us. Even if church meetings aren’t conducted in a way that reaches us, we can take responsibility and find a way to feel the spirit.

So please, write down reactions and thoughts to what happened in Church. You might keep your own ‘spiritual journal’, or, if you like, you can post your reactions below. I’m adding my own reactions and thoughts as a comment to this post — instead of as a part of this post, because my reactions aren’t any better than anyone else’s.

Let me emphasize that this is NOT a place to criticize what is wrong with church or your fellow congregants. The point is to post what you learned because of what happened at Church or how that led you to think. It’s about the good things we can get out of Church, not the negative things that disturbed or upset us. It doesn’t have to be orthodox, traditional or even on topic.

If you like, make your response in the format, “They said or did this, and I said or thought that.” Even the things you dislike the most can be turned into lessons for what the gospel teaches we should do.

My hope is that these reactions serve as an example of a better way to treat what happens at Church instead of the perennial complaints about speaker or teacher preparation or ability, or complaints that the Church should do things differently.


Comments

One response to “Your Reactions to Church Yesterday, 2/1”

  1. Here are a few of my reactions to my Church meetings yesterday (2/1):

    • Several of the testimonies today spoke about the Old Testament. One struck me because the speaker claimed that they gained a testimony from the Old Testament, because it taught that God will deliver his people. This is something I need to think about, because it seems to me like the Old Testament is so complex its hard to get a single message from it.
    • The focus on covenants in Church today (again influenced by the Old Testament), made me think a bit more about covenants. We talk about them helping us reach God, but I wonder what the mechanism is. Do they provide a structure? A way of thinking about life? Are they about accountability? How do covenants work exactly?
    • The teacher in Sunday School pointed out that the lists of generations in the book of Genesis and elsewhere is a common ancient genre — which tries to help individuals connect into the broader group because of who they are related to. I think that’s part of the reason they don’t work that well for us today, since we don’t see anyone in the lists that we connect to.
    • In Sunday School one person defined the Bible as a book about “how to human.” Well, yes. I agree. That’s exactly what it is. And it includes bad examples as well as good examples.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.