First Shall be Last and the Last Shall be First: A Didactic, Overbearing Parable

Yes, I know nobody perfectly fits these stereotypes. 

Once upon a time Bill was a 7th-generation member who loved his Mormon community. His grandfather had been a [insert high Church or BYU or Utah business culture position]. For him Church participation wasn’t much of a sacrifice, but rather was a part of the waters he swam in, and participation was natural to him growing up. His life was more or less the same whether there were actual gold plates or not. He loved the fact that in his super stable, large Utah ward there was always somebody with a casserole to drop by when things were tough. He had had the benefit of a massive young men’s program growing up, was AP on his mission, and went to BYU, but he was eager to finally get out of Utah for graduate school. 

While there his mind was opened to new ways of thinking and new facts, and he felt an obligation to return to Utah to let them know about the knowledge of the outside world. By now he had transcended the truth claims of the Church, and was more interested in what they meant more high-level. He knew that many of the simple Utahns he had grown up with needed the myths, so he had no plans to disabuse them of those particulars, but he was excited by the prospect that all of the immense social and religious capital of the Church could be turned towards helping the poor, promoting social justice, and fighting against climate change. He was rather charming and good natured, and that plus his family name naturally led to him being tapped for local-level leadership positions. 

Meanwhile, his children took advantage of the uber-stability of the Utah environment, and he wanted them to go to BYU, but he wanted them to be edgy BYU, the kind of students who challenged the conservative environment. However, by the time they were older they showed no desire to attend BYU, go on missions, or do any of the things. Why would they do so simply out of a homage to their parents’ culture? They eventually left the Church and drifted and did their own thing. One of his children got married and had one child, but the others had little interest in marriage or children, and Bill and his wife started to slip into inactivity. The Church hadn’t really taken advantage of all of his insights and learning, and without his children coming to Church he didn’t really see the point. He gradually realized that, if he could do it all over again, he probably would have chosen a non-Latter-day Saint life; he certainly wouldn’t have spent two years in his prime on a mission.

At the same time there was a recent convert named Maria. She had recently moved to Utah for work and had had a rough upbringing. She had known some members in high school and noticed something different about them. While in Utah she ran into some missionaries on the street, noticed the same vibe, and accepted their invitations to attend Church. In fits and starts, she gradually accepted the gospel and was baptized, although she would be the first to admit that she didn’t understand everything, tithing was a huge deal, and that some things were weird; she gradually felt more and more of the spirit as she drew closer to the Church. Her ward was very welcoming, but she was confused when in a Sunday School class Bill, the resident member of Utah Mormon royalty, said things about early Church leaders that had some snark. She knew the leaders in question were imperfect, but it was an odd sentiment to feel in a Sunday school class.

Bill was part of a group in her ward whose interactions with the Church seemed to mostly revolve around the edgier aspects of the Church, or the things they thought the Church should do. However, she was blessed with a gold star ministering sister, and she eventually received her endowments. Hers was a simple faith, but that was enough to be able to discern who had the gospel in their life and never took the Church as an institution and the gospel and truth claims that underlay it for granted. And she lived happily ever after.   


Comments

19 responses to “First Shall be Last and the Last Shall be First: A Didactic, Overbearing Parable”

  1. Many such cases. Well written.

  2. So long as I only say things with snark about church leaders in the 1960’s, 70’s, and 80’s, while still respecting early church leaders, I’m good then. Right?

  3. Can you say straw man? I knew you could.

  4. Sigh…I’d hoped you had moved past attacking your fellow Saints as fifth columnists.

    I love how in the parable all bad ideas come from outside Utah. During my brief sojourn in Utah I found that members there had a wide variety of ways of thinking about the gospel, including those you don’t approve of.

    I hope all your children stay active in the Church. But if they don’t, I hope you get over thinking that when children leave it’s their parents’ fault. Because I know from experience that the adversary will use it against you: “No success can compensate for failure in the home…and you failed. It’s over. You might as well quit.” (Bill slipping away after his children leave resonates, but not for the reasons you think.) It’s taken me years to get over that, and I probably wouldn’t be writing this so quickly if I were over it entirely. I really regret the way I judged people based on it.

  5. Someone has been reading Jacob Chapter 5.

  6. This overly simplistic and uber-caricatured polemic could be vastly improved by simply opening the doors and letting a little reality in. For so many conservatives, intellectualism is assumed to cause religious disengagement. Is that really true? Many intellectuals like Bill possess a strong spiritual side and walk the covenant path. And what does this BYU thing mean? BYU is hardly the center of spirituality in the Church. Why is any emphasis on social justice viewed as a displacement of spiritual devotion? Is that notion based on reality or is it a conservative bias? And is it really true that simple faith always produces durable outcomes? I doubt it is true. Life is complicated. The Church loses a large percentage of new converts of the simple faith variety. The ones that stay often struggle for years. Most pack their bags for a variety of reasons, many reasons not of their own making.

    And is there really a “happily ever after” in true discipleship? Let’s open the doors.

  7. Stephen’s parable is meant to be way over-the-top. What scares me about it is the fact that there’s so much truth in it–in spite of the stereotypical schtick!

  8. I usually write these kinds of posts as a warning to myself. Maybe Stephen doesn’t, but I suspect he’d include himself among the people he has in mind. All of RLD’s objections are important – parents can do everything right and still have to see their children make their own choices – but the last being first, like the parable of the wedding feast, really does play out in real life, including in some of the ways Stephen describes.

  9. Yes, I wanted to avoid getting into a fine-grained back-and-forth about what I meant about this or that characteristic, since every situation is distinct and the heavy-handedness was kind of the point, but I do think a lot of these things tend to cluster.

    That being said, I want to make it absolutely clear that I’m not passing any kind of judgment about people whose child or children leave the Church. (Statistically I’ll more than likely be one of them given my large brood). Children leave in orthodox families, they leave in heterodox families, but my sense is that the children of cultural members or parents who self-consciously raise their children to be edgy Mormons rarely if ever stay (incidentally, the same could be said of other religious traditions, e.g. more assimilation among reform Jews than Orthodox Jews).

  10. I think the youth aged children of zealot, church hugging members that take most of children’s agency away regarding choices that really dont matter such as seminary, scout camps, mutual attendance, missions, etc are most likely to leave. Nobody likes to be forced to live a certain way even if it is the apparent right way. God knows this and treats us all as such. Hard for us mortals to do the same with our children.

    Exceptions are of course out there. Some kids will leave under almost any conditions. It has been my experience that most leave because of strict orthodox upbringing. My parents would be considered “edgy” or for sure unorthodox. Out of the 10 of us kids, (utah raised) we are all still active (some edgy some zealot) and in our mid fifties+ in age. We beat the odds big time. Our parents were divorced too (blended family) and out of the 10, none of us are divorced. Again, beating the odds. Two of my biological siblings that were zealot- like parents have several children each that have left the church. Myself (edgy camp) and my edgy brother together have 9 children and all 9 are active. (so far… and all are adults now) I have two close friends that were ultra orthodox and strict parents. Both have had all their children leave the church. (11 total)

    My dad left the church for 26 years and came back so for those who have kids that have left, chances are they will be back eventually. IMO.

    I am sure there are many instances just the opposite of mine too. I have thought about and researched (not official) this issue for years and have many theories as to why this happens. Love is a big part of the equation. Children are leaving the parents religion as they did not feel loved by parents for not complying to said religion. Other children just believed the parents regarding the religion and dont have the personal seek and find experience to keep them in the church when questions come. So many reasons to list.

    The big and spacious building is full of our own family pointing and laughing to us believers. Makes it harder to hold on. The worse is yet to come IMO. Hold on!

  11. My parenting style was heavily influenced by watching children from a very conservative, very strict family crash and burn as soon as they were no longer under their parents’ control. My children were going to have their own testimonies and understand why the rules are what they are so they choose to obey them! And that failed too. (Sort of…my kids are everything I could ask for except religious.) If there’s any approach that works consistently I haven’t seen it–agency trumps everything even Heavenly Parents do.

    Do children of “edgy Mormons” leave more often? Yeah, probably, depending somewhat on where you draw the line. But for some adults, being an edgy Mormon is a phase they go through on their way towards leaving the Church, while for others it’s just how they are. The children of the first group rarely make it, often leaving before their parents do, but the children of the second group seem to be about as likely to make it as anyone else. (My bishop is at least as edgy as I am, and his adult children are doing great.) In the first case, being edgy is a symptom of a deeper problem, and in the second, it’s not a problem at all, so I’m not sure “Don’t be an edgy Mormon” is useful advice to anyone.

  12. “If there’s any approach that works consistently I haven’t seen it–agency trumps everything even Heavenly Parents do.” Agree 100%. And yes, the super-conservative-family-whose-kids-crash-once-they-leave-their-insulated-environment is definitely a thing. And also yes, it matters where you draw the line on edginess (I remember the look on my bishop’s face when I mentioned that I listen to Joe Rogan). I guess that’s why I said “self-consciously,” to differentiate between somebody who’s a little heterodox or cut from different cloth from somebody for whom the edginess is a big part of what they want their kids’ religious identities to be.

  13. John Mansfield

    A part of the child/parent dynamic I have wondered about is influences from a couple sides that may lead a parent of non-participating children to also become non-participating. One side is exemplified by the Boyd Packer/David Bednar-type teaching that family is the most important thing in the church, more important than everything else put together, and the other side is a worldly perspective that religion is mostly a tool to teach children morals and comfort old ladies, and has a pretty minor role in the lives of functioning adults. For some, departure of children from gospel-oriented life seems to be dealt with by protectively downplaying the importance of a gospel-oriented life. “I haven’t lost anything that really matters.” That is just one possible way of living with those things, though. Many parents of religiously inactive children are themselves full of faith and devotion. In my own quorum, most faithful men over 50 have at least one child who they wish would come back to gospel participation.

  14. While I stand by earlier comment about straw men, I have to continually remind myself that posts like this one are really about the author’s fear, bias, and inclination to judge others, than they are about real people who think, feel and perceive differently than the author.

  15. ” the other side is a worldly perspective that religion is mostly a tool to teach children morals and comfort old ladies, and has a pretty minor role in the lives of functioning adults. ”

    Ahhh!!! It drives me nuts when the nuanced, intelligent, smarty pants people take this view. (Not aimed necessarily at the commenter, I realize it was third person rhetoric).

    Yes, of course the first half is true. So what’s the damn role of these so called functioning adults? How about TEACH CHILDREN AND COMFORT OLD LADIES!! (does that bring a scripture to mind about pure religion?)

    Don’t these “functioning” adults understand that the work of God continues? The work he invited us to participate in. And just as we allegedly became “functioning” by the previous generations sacrifices, so too must we do the same; not by patting ourselves on the back by getting rid of the thing that fashioned us but by carrying on what we’ve received. Incidentally, what if essentially that’s the same pattern for eternity after we are resurrected (spoiler alert, it is)?

    “But wait, I need to have more me time,” they say. “If I did that, I’d be living my life for someone else.”

    To which, Jeff Foxworthy might reply, yes, here’s your temple recommend. Now go and do thou likewise.

    (And just maybe in giving up your life, you might find it)

  16. Pontius Python

    Not to overcomplicate what is explicitly intended to be an overly simplified story, but I’d just like to point out that *somewhere* on the internet there’s bound to be a similar post that calls out someone very similar to Maria for being “edgy” about her childhood faith (whatever it was) that she left, and that praises someone very similar to Bill for jumping ship to Maria’s childhood faith after finding that his own didn’t fit.

  17. Pontius Python

    And I’d also like to point out that this overly simplified story says nothing about *Maria’s* children, if she has any – unless her “happily ever after” ending is supposed to imply that none of her children fall away from the Church. But again, to slightly complicate a deliberately oversimplified story: there are *many* Marias in the world whose children, like those of Bill, don’t stay in their childhood faith when they grow up.

  18. John,

    My husband and I left the church a couple years ago. For me, it was a combo of lots of stuff, mainly historical. Previous to leaving, my teen sons all stopped going to church for various reasons. To your point, my husband mainly stopped going because he saw family as more important and didn’t want it to be a source of contention or a reason for spending less time together as a family. So, it definitely happens. If the church prioritizes family, for some people that might mean less church. At least in our ward with few teens few activities, no friends their ages, church really had no appeal.

  19. Kendall Buchanan

    Stephen C,

    You mentioned assimilation in Reform Judaism… Reform Judaism began in the early 19th century and over the course of the late 19th and early 20th centuries basically won all the growth races. In the U.S. especially, progressive Judaism (Reform + Conservatism + Reconstructionism) dominated orthodoxy in the face of claims that assimilation would kill the faith. Orthodoxy itself assimilated over similar time frames and modernized to the point where ultra-orthodoxy (what might pass as pre-Enlightenment Judaism) became vanishingly small.

    Having said that, Reform Judaism definitely became more anemic in recent decades, and orthodoxy more ascendant. I think my point is simply that Judaism doesn’t track on a straight line where progressivism equals less-devotion the way we think of mainline progressive Christian movements. It’s actually mature, still vibrant today, and heavily influenced orthodoxy itself.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.