Feeding the hungry has negative ROI

The holiest service you perform, the kind of service Jesus asks of those who would be his disciples, will not be rewarded with success, respect, or even a lot of happy feelings. That was never part of the bargain, and you should be aware of that in advance.

For at least several decades, the world’s advanced economies have been very good at directing people’s labor towards productive ends so that they can provide for themselves, if not to live in luxury, then at least to get by most of the time, while offering various forms of support to get people through their hard times. It’s far from a perfect system, but most people can figure out a way to make it work unless something has gone badly wrong.

As it turns out, there are more than a few people for whom things have gone badly wrong: severe disability, mental illness, a history of drug use and/or incarceration, and more. Varying combinations of bad luck and poor choices, justice when they needed mercy, and neglect when they needed care.

You probably can’t give them everything they need, because stable housing and professional treatment are beyond your capacity to give. In some cases, they wouldn’t accept these things even if they were available. Often the best you can do is lend a sympathetic ear and be part of a stable social network.

The least of these do not, in my experience, need a sophisticated interpretation of the Book of Mormon. They are unlikely to reward your care with deep and enlightening wisdom. Sometimes they can be warm and funny on the good days, while you struggle to decipher their texts on other days. You can do what you can for a while, and then they drift away to some other place, possibly showing up again years later.

This is not to say that it’s all futile. If a ward has enough human resources to throw at the task, it can create an environment that is exactly what some families need. I’ve seen it happen, and it’s truly miraculous. But even in those cases, success typically looks like the kids graduating from high school and finding stable employment, rather than serving missions or graduating college or being called as Elders Quorum president. That certainly isn’t impossible, but don’t count on it.

If all are truly welcome in your congregation the way Jesus meant, there will be costs and tradeoffs. If you truly minister to the despised, not every activity will be well organized, not every testimony will be uplifting, not every prayer will follow the prescribed pattern, not every question asked in Sunday School will be relevant, and not everyone will be able to stay in their seats for the whole hour.

People will talk. As much as people say they love to help the needy, the truth is that most of us want to be around people like ourselves or people we aspire to be like. Some people will move in, sit through a few meetings, and then re-assess their Sunday schedule. Or families scouting out the area will get hints about the wards that have strong youth programs. It’s a lot more fun to focus on building community connections, vibrant intellectual life, or exciting youth activities. It smells less of tobacco, alcohol, or unwashed bodies.

If you serve the needy in the Savior’s way, there is no guarantee that your efforts will be positively received, let alone noticed, by your children, other members of your ward and stake, community members, investigators, or even by the people you were trying to help. You could literally cure them of their chronic illness, and 90% of them would wander off without acknowledging it.

Most importantly, feeding the hungry and serving those in need is no guarantee that anyone will feed you when you are hungry. All you can do, while you still have food to share, is make the world a place where the hungry are .0002% more likely to be fed.


Comments

14 responses to “Feeding the hungry has negative ROI”

  1. 34 “Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world.
    35 For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in,
    36 I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’
    37 “Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink?
    38 When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you?
    39 When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’
    40 “The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’

  2. I keep composing and deleting responses to this. Nothing I write seems adequate. I guess all I can say is thank you. From the bottom of my heart, thank you.

  3. I honestly can’t tell if this is sincere or extremely well-crafted satire. I’m assuming satire, but in both views you’ve managed to avoid obvious malice.

    My only quibble, given that ROI is the framing, is that even a strictly-secular financier-type might recognize the positive ROI of a short-term cost (providing food or shelter) preventing a deeper cost (chronic hospitalization), as well as the nearly infinite ROI of small acts of generosity becoming lives well-lived and shared outward.

    And those indecipherable texts contain enlightenments of humanity that we have not yet developed the capacity to comprehend.

  4. And sadly in some situations more often than not, that drowning seaman you set out to rescue will pull you down into the abyss with them. Or the surrounding waves and rocks will leave you more battered than if you just concentrated on your own sailing.

  5. To clarify, there is nothing satirical about this. Often the people we need to serve are not particularly sympathetic and not positioned to turn their lives around. There’s certainly a need for other kinds of service as well, for the health and educational and financial programs that let people gain an education and climb out of poverty. But that still leaves a lot of cases where no one is going to be grateful for what you’ve done. It’s best to be aware of that in advance so you aren’t disappointed when no one notices, at least not in a positive way.

  6. You will then understand that it is indeed “more blessed to give than to receive.” But the giving must be of the heart without any taint of self, without desire for reward. The gift of pure love is always attended with bliss. If, after you have given, you are wounded because you are not thanked or flattered, or your name put in the paper, know then that your gift was prompted by vanity and not by love, and you were merely giving in order to get; were not really giving, but grasping.

    Lose yourself in the welfare of others; forget yourself in all that you do; this is the secret of abounding happiness.

    James Allen 1901

  7. Paul Roberts

    I hate the parable/story of the kid throwing starfish back into the water mainly because you don’t hear it about some kid throwing jellyfish back; and, both starfish and jellyfish would/will otherwise die on the beach, but the starfish are viewed as somehow more deserving of help. That said, if all you do is help one person or thing while a million more go unaided, that’s still not insignificant to the one helped–whether your help is acknowledged or not.

  8. Beautifully and truly said, Jonathan.

  9. rogerdhansen

    Half the membership of the Church lives in developing countries around the globe. While growth in Church membership in developed countries is stagnating, growth in Africa and South America is booming. And many of these members and their neighbors are living in poverty and could use our help.

    At the same time, the globe is getting smaller. Social media facilitates international communications. Cellphones have become almost universal. Air and other forms of transportation have made the world smaller. Technologies like solar, water treatment, wastewater treatment, the Internet, low-cost low-power computers, etc have made opportunities to help endless. We live in a wonderful time.

    Christ said love thy neighbor. And the definition of neighbor has expanded to include everyone living around the world.

  10. Oh, this was clearly sincere, and written by someone who has done the work. (Probably more consistently than I have: I confess I have a pattern of getting involved, getting frustrated, being secretly glad when the person I was trying to help moves on, and then withdrawing for a while.) In the hope that the work is more sustainable when you don’t have unrealistic expectations, I’ll add my observation:

    Don’t expect to have normal friendships with the people you help. In a leadership seminar I attended for work some years ago, one of the adages was “Relationships are Currency.” Well, when you can count on your basic needs like food and shelter being met, you have the luxury of only thinking about your work relationships that way. The very poor sometimes have to rely on their social networks to survive, and often cultivate them (insofar as they are able) for that purpose.

    So don’t be disappointed when you feel like they’re primarily interested in you as a resource. Don’t get angry when they try to manipulate you. (You don’t have to let them succeed.) Above all, don’t react to them or judge them the way you would if one of your middle or upper-class friends behaved that way–you’d all do the same if you were in their situation.

  11. Kendall Buchanan

    Thanks for this, Jonathan, couldn’t agree more. The best service is the kind that can’t be returned.

  12. Thanks for the kind comments. To clarify again, I’m terrible at this kind of service, so this post is also a reminder to me. When I’m asked to do something like this or see an opportunity for it, or see other people doing it week after week, I have to resist the voice that says: Yeah, sure, but how is this going to pay off? By what metric is this an effective use of resources?

  13. TexasAbuelo

    After a lifetime of observing what ya’ll might describe as “Christlike” service of many anonymous Christians (LDS and other denominations) and others of other faiths and no particular faith at all – I wholeheartedly disagree with your initial assertion that such efforts don’t produce success, respect, or happiness. I have seen and felt these things myself, and seen it in many many others… assuming feeding the hungry, getting clean water supplies, tutoring kids who can’t read, helping girls & women access medical care, helping people access medical screenings or vacunas – thru persuasion – they knew nothing about or were averse to, repairing bikes, motos, etc, for better transportation to improve economic situation… just for starters…(assuming all this qualifies for your “Christ like service”) —- the helpers and helpees consistently come out happy…many of the folks I’ve served with, I’ll admit, come from dirt poor backgrounds.. we’ve gone hungry as children or wondered where our next meal was coming from; as adults some of us have found ourselves “between roofs over our heads..” or being on the hoping end of other poor people’s charity. We don’t carry around any particular middle class burden of guilt about any “prosperity “ we might have achieved or agonize or philosophize over what we are or aren’t doing… we’ll leave the hand wringing to the overthinking overphilosophizing gringos with lots of time on their hands. We serve who we can, when we can, with what we can. Donde comen 2 comen 3….Relax, “haz el bien y no mires a quien!”’como dice el dicho

  14. Norman Maclean said much the same thing in his novel A River Runs Through It.

    “Each one of us here today will at one time in our lives look upon a loved one who is in need and ask the same question: We are willing to help, Lord, but what, if anything, is needed? For it is true we can seldom help those closest to us. Either we don’t know what part of ourselves to give or, more often than not, the part we have to give is not wanted. And so it is those we live with and should know who elude us. But we can still love them – we can love completely without complete understanding.”
    ? Norman Maclean, A River Runs Through It and Other Stories

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.