Worse than a crime

The way the United States is treating immigrants is a terrible mistake.

In a country that would otherwise have a shrinking population, immigration is essential to mitigate the problems of an increasingly elderly population. At a time of low unemployment, immigration is essential to keep the economy running. One look at the ranks of successful entrepreneurs and high-tech founders should be enough to convince you that attracting the world’s top talent is essential for a dynamic economy. Bringing in students and other immigrants from abroad lets us absorb cultural impetus and project our own influence on a global scale. Here are some other things we depend on immigration for: military enlistment; university students and faculty; teachers in our local schools; my bishopric.

Our country only exists today because of centuries of immigration. This country will only have a future if immigration continues. I am not in favor of open borders, but if forced to choose, open borders would be far preferable to what we would become without immigrants.

Of course we have made some mistakes when it comes to immigration. It was a mistake to treat immigrants as a historically oppressed group to whom amends must be made. Regardless of whether or not historical oppression took place, the issue is a distraction from the primary needs and desires of most immigrants today: employment, stable housing, and a fair chance to build a life in the United States.

But the biggest mistake, a fatal strategic mistake, is treating immigrants as a threat, trying to make their lives miserable, subjecting them to arbitrary detention and expulsion, destroying our country’s status as the preferred destination by far for academic and entrepreneurial talent, and creating ‘illegal immigrant’ as a class that is an acceptable target of cruelty and aestheticized violence.

The delight in cruelty toward immigrants is particularly grotesque. Promoting fear of other people and stoking resentment toward them will canker your soul as badly as indulging in the most depraved pornography.

Are you concerned about limiting the number of immigrants, deporting violent criminals, prioritizing the most promising would-be immigrants, or establishing an orderly system for granting asylum? Great, please call on your congressional representatives to pass the appropriate legislation. But people with degrees, homes, jobs, families? Help them stay. We need them!

If you watched the most recent session of General Conference, you would have seen that the Church has quite a lot to say about the value of immigrants.


Comments

13 responses to “Worse than a crime”

  1. Thank you.

  2. Amen

  3. Amen.

    The founders rejected using displays of cruelty as a deterrent–see the 8th amendment. Sending people to brutal prisons in third world countries or taking children away from their parents (and in some cases never giving them back) are nothing less than displays of cruelty, but I’m not even sure people thinking about immigrating to the US illegally are the primary audience.

  4. Mortimer

    Thank you for ringing the bell about this important topic.

    “Promoting fear of other people and stoking resentment toward them will canker your soul . . .”
    Yes- 1000X yes.

  5. ideasnstuff

    Mortimer: The people who do this already have a cankered soul. They want to canker yours and mine as well, to make us miserable like unto themselves.

  6. your food allergy

    Thank you for using the means that you have to raise your voice.

    ” . . . the Church has quite a lot to say about the value of immigrants.”

    That is probably true, so why don’t they say it? We have never needed a prophet more than now.

  7. Ojiisan

    “Our country only exists today because of centuries of immigration. This country will only have a future if immigration continues. I am not in favor of open borders, but if forced to choose, open borders would be far preferable to what we would become without immigrants.”

    Quite amusing!

    The choice is not as you have implied between “open borders” and “no immigration”. There are very few who are not in favor of immigration by individuals who apply and are admitted to stay in accordance with laws and who then comply with laws while they are here. The country will have a future if these types of individuals are permitted to immigrate.

    The country exists today because of centuries of legal immigrants who value the country and live in accordance with its laws.

  8. Your food allergy: When a third of conference talks and half of the prayers are given by people not speaking American English, that is saying something. Would I enjoy hearing some blunt language too? Absolutely. But I don’t know that would be more effective at reaching the people who need to hear it.

    Ojiisan, sadly, we’ve seen numerous people detained for deportation recently who are here legally and making positive contributions to society. Personally, I don’t think we should deport people who aren’t here legally but are doing their part. They pay taxes and support a Social Security system that they will never benefit from. Ruining their lives and deporting them is a mistake, especially in a world with drastically slowing population growth. We take for granted that there will always be plenty of people who want to come here, but there are severe problems that can’t be fixed when that changes.

  9. Ojiisan

    Jonathan:

    I expect that we would have to agree to disagree. Hard to see how obviating the consequences for those who act in a manner contrary to applicable laws would be in the best interests of the country. If there is a need for greater immigration, as you state, my understanding is that there are millions who have applied, or will apply, legally to immigrate, particularly if the long wait times are shortened.

  10. Let’s admit it. Donald Trump is not an American. He shares none of the values the Founders tried to embed in the Constitution and in our society. If anyone should be deported, it is TACO man.

  11. Ojiisan, with low unemployment and a soon to fall number of young people entering college or the workforce, we need everyone we can get. We do need to fix our system for legal immigration so that the process is orderly and wait times are short. I think we can agree on at least that much.

    Tom, it’s tempting to reduce this to one person, and there are some policies that can in fact be attributed largely to him. But not this one – the harsh approach to immigration is enabled by numerous government officials, continues to poll well, and was the democratic choice of an informed electorate, to our lasting shame.

  12. There have been many efforts, gangs of eight, compromises and fixes, over the past two decades, all stillborn in congress, usually because an ultra-right faction wants to continue to demagogue the issue rather than make any progress. This was never more clear than last year when Republican Senator Lankford negotiated a bipartisan border bill, but Trump instructed Republicans to vote against their own compromise, so he could pretend that Biden was at fault for every problem, and use the issue to help gain his primary objective: staying out of jail and getting revenge on all his enemies.

  13. Hoosier

    Immigration is at best a form of kicking the can down the road when it comes to demographic collapse. Birthrates are falling just about everywhere, among immigrant populations as well. I predict that in coming years this sort of “Hoover up the human resources of the whole world in order to postpone the inevitable” will come to be seen as its own sort of neo-meta-postcolonial-whatever resource extraction, the kind of thing which tomorrow’s enlightened bloggers and desperate Ph.D candidates will deplore and condemn today’s figures for condoning. (This snark is not directed at you, Jonathan) And if the opposite occurs and automation and mass workforce reconfiguration are in our near future, then voluntarily bringing in lots of potential dependents is a really really bad plan from the perspective of social stability. In that scenario, all of the OP’s arguments about immigration as an economic necessity flip on their heads.

    Biden’s immigration numbers were the stat that saved both Trump’s life and career. The longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see that God has a sense of humor.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.