- rogerdhansen on Constructing in our Meetings (Or What Did Church Lead You to Think About Yesterday), 9/6: “Kent, I don’t how my recommendations specifically helps me. The second paragraph suggests a method for having more money going to help the poor. Half the membership lives in developing countries. They and their neighbors need help. I’d rather give to the poor rather hoard money or build McTemples. And what’s with paying tithing before feeding your family? The first paragraph suggests a way that members can protest the current 2-hr schedule. Since members aren’t supposed to communicate directly with high-level GAs, there are few avenues for making suggestions. I’m suggesting one.” Sep 11, 12:07
- on Academics and Church growth: a demographic just-so story: “The branch I used to advise fits this story perfectly. When I was assigned, two professors at the local college were the branch president and one of his counselors, and their wives were also pillars of the branch. When they moved away, the branch suffered. Fortunately one new professor moved in–he’s now the Elder’s Quorum President and his wife is the Primary President–but they’re still short-handed. I live in one of those grad student wards (I moved down the prestige ladder by becoming staff rather than faculty while staying at the same university). One major change is that the grad student couples have substantially fewer children than they did even 20 years ago, so our Primary is small. No doubt that’s partially because much more often than in the past it’s the wife who is the grad student (or they both are). But some mothers of young children successfully navigate challenging graduate programs and even medical residencies, so it can be done. But…I think the politicalization of universities has been greatly exaggerated. Sure, most of the faculty are Democrats–the realignment of the parties along educational lines under Trump has seen to that. But politics is irrelevant* to most of what a university does, and in departments like Chemistry, Physics, Engineering, etc. it comes up no more often than in the average workplace. The politics is mostly concentrated in the social sciences (with the twist that Economics often leans right) and the humanities. Many of the stories you hear on Fox News about extremists at universities are true, but they’re not typical. Zealous undergrads have a lot less power than either they or the right-wing media think they have. Church members do just fine in the apolitical fields. Off the top of my head, current and past leaders around my stake include professors in Chemical Engineering, Physics, Biology, Accounting, Statistics, Geology, and more. Church members do struggle more in the social sciences and humanities. Conflicts with the Church are especially serious in behavioral health fields like psychology and social work, and that’s where I see members struggle the most. Of course if members go into the “studies” (gender studies, LGBT studies, etc.) odds are they’re already on their way out. *Okay, politics were irrelevant until the second Trump administration took a sledgehammer to federally funded research (and scared off so many foreign students). If grant funding goes back to being apolitical the hard science researchers will go back to being apolitical too, at least in the workplace. But even now, nobody in Chemical Engineering really cares what you think about the Proclamation on the Family.” Sep 11, 08:19
- on Academics and Church growth: a demographic just-so story: “RL, dentistry seems like a pretty good choice: you can help people in a concrete way, much better work-life balance, a real financial payoff, etc. Michael, that’s interesting, and kind of concerning. Any theories on what’s going on?” Sep 10, 23:07
- on Constructing in our Meetings (Or What Did Church Lead You to Think About Yesterday), 9/6: “Kent, It doesn’t seem right to me to compare Viktor Frankl’s circumstance to a rank-and-file Latter-day Saint today — doesn’t doing a comparison of the “victims” (Frankl and today’s saint) necessarily also involve a comparison of the “authorities” (Nazi goons and church leaders)? I don’t recall that Frankl described himself as “happy” in his circumstances. No, maybe let’s not compare a Nazi concentration camp with a LDS ward.” Sep 10, 21:41
- on Academics and Church growth: a demographic just-so story: “I have noticed a similar pattern in a different career path… the MBA. BYU used to send MBAs all over the country, including where I live in the PNW: a steady supply of new young-ish families. But for a variety of reasons, that pipeline, at least to my region, is all but dried up.” Sep 10, 21:35
- on Academics and Church growth: a demographic just-so story: “LDS Social Science Academics are likely on the endangered list except maybe economics. Subjective but it does seem like Western US white male members are more likely to do Dentistry and Business instead of becoming a teacher.” Sep 10, 15:37
- on Academics and Church growth: a demographic just-so story: “Stephen and Coffinberry, I agree. There’s a lot of nuance and variation that depends on what particular disciplines have done over the last several decades. (I do have positive feelings about Nebraska ag programs these days though, since our current bishop is a graduate.)” Sep 10, 15:12
- on Kingdoms of Glory and Astronomical Apparent Magnitude: “Why would you think that the metaphorical language of D&C 76 could be reduced to mere mathematics? While I get that the language there is making a comparison of luminosity and glory, I don’t think they are the same thing at all. Instead, luminosity is a symbol for glory. As happens way too often, this logic is substituting the “finger pointing at the moon” for the moon itself.” Sep 10, 14:58
- on Constructing in our Meetings (Or What Did Church Lead You to Think About Yesterday), 9/6: “rogerdhansen: I’m sorry these issues are so hard for you. But have you considered what are the other implications of your solutions? You might send a message, but you also won’t get anything from whatever interactions and discussions happen after SM. And, FWIW, I’m not at all certain that your message will get through in either case. In addition, I can’t help but observe that your reactions make it seem like what should happen in Church is supposed to be what will benefit you. Is that really what Church is about? Old Man: Why think critically about what happens at church? RLD said it — we can control how we react, and what we do to make things better. Several months ago, I referenced Viktor Frankl’s book “Man’s Search for Meaning” — did you read about that? He experienced the ultimate in having zero control, and that book suggests how to be happy in such circumstances. Don’t you think that approach is relevant?” Sep 10, 14:48
- on Academics and Church growth: a demographic just-so story: “In doing family history research I had opportunity to closely study the records of the the Northern States Mission, which at the time included much of the Midwest (Iowa, Illinois, Nebraska, etc.). My interest was southeast Iowa, but because I now live in Lincoln, NE I was also watching reports from that area as well. I observed that a huge factor in the LDS diaspora that created new units in this area during the 1950s and 1960s was the Agriculture programs (either folks coming out of Utah State or Arizona State, or coming to the big Ag schools in Iowa, Illinois, and Nebraska). So many leaders of little branches came out here as Ag teachers or Ag Specialists (lots of USDA types). For lots of reasons, that pipeline is quite dead, but it built a lot of buildings (including the one I currently attend church in). So, all this to say that I agree with you, just adding that Ag is perhaps an invisible aspect of the once formidable pipeline.” Sep 10, 14:29
