A Review: Richard Lyman Bushman: A Mormon Ambassador

•

J. B. Haws. Richard Lyman Bushman: A Mormon Ambassador. Introductions to Mormon Thought. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2026. 157 pp. Paperback: $17.95. ISBN: 978-0-252-08935-0.

Reviewed by Chad L. Nielsen

Within the landscape of modern American religious historiography, few scholars have navigated the boundary between confessional commitment and critical academic rigor as deftly as Richard Lyman Bushman. As the Gouverneur Morris Professor of History Emeritus at Columbia University and one of the preeminent biographers of Joseph Smith, Bushman has long served as an intellectual bridge between the secular academy and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. In Richard Lyman Bushman: A Mormon Ambassador, published as part of the University of Illinois Press’s Introductions to Mormon Thought series, J. B. Haws—executive director of the Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship—makes a compelling case for Bushman as one of the towering architects of twentieth- and twenty-first-century Latter-day Saint thought.

A copy of J. B. Haws's biography of Richard Lyman Bushman.

Haws structures his volume with a biographical and geographical rhythm, organizing Bushman’s sprawling intellectual life around three primary roles and locales: Historian (Boston), Theologian (Salt Lake City), and Mentor (New York City). Rather than presenting a dry intellectual abstract, Haws demonstrates how Bushman’s intellectual output is fundamentally inseparable from his lived religious practice.

The Pastoral Scholar and Confessional Rigor

One of the volume’s most valuable achievements is Haws’s foregrounding of Bushman’s deeply pastoral nature. Alongside his Ivy League professorships and Bancroft Prize-winning early American scholarship, Bushman spent decades serving as a missionary, bishop, stake president, and patriarch. Haws illustrates how these ecclesiastical roles directly informed Bushman’s scholarship, transforming him into an accessible counselor for generations of Latter-day Saints navigating faith crises sparked by historical complexities.

At the core of Bushman’s intellectual ethos was a controversial, pioneering willingness to make his own faith a transparent element of his scholarship. Rather than adopting the detached, secular naturalism standard in university departments, Bushman practiced an empathetic phenomenology of the past. He sought to understand historical actors—most famously Joseph Smith—from the inside out, seeing the world through their visionary, nineteenth-century eyes rather than imposing modern materialist explanations. As Haws observes, Bushman operated as a “gentle provocateur,” convinced that placing Latter-day Saint claims into rigorous comparative dialogue with world traditions would always illuminate truth rather than destroy it.

Navigating the Hierarchy: Packer and Institutional Ambivalence

For students of Mormon intellectual history, the most fascinating section of the book examines Bushman’s complex interactions with the Church’s leading councils. In historical lore, Elder Boyd K. Packer has often been cast as the great antagonist of the “New Mormon History” and its practitioners. Haws, however, provides a nuanced, three-dimensional reappraisal of this relationship. He shows that Packer’s public and private cautions to historians were not merely anti-intellectual broadsides; they frequently probed genuine methodological concerns about audience, reductionism, and faith that Bushman himself wrestled with as a believer-historian.

Furthermore, Haws highlights Bushman’s distinctive theology of church governance. Unlike dissidents who engaged in public polemics, Bushman cultivated a deliberate posture of ecclesiastical deference, viewing subordination to priesthood authority not as intellectual surrender, but as an authentic expression of covenant discipleship.

Yet, Haws does not obscure the sharp ironies and administrative ambivalence that characterized this relationship. A striking case study is the ill-fated sixteen-volume sesquicentennial history series planned in the 1970s by Church Historian Leonard J. Arrington. Church leadership ultimately shut down the series, largely out of institutional discomfort with Bushman’s assigned contribution, Joseph Smith and the Origins of Mormonism. In a subsequent institutional paradox, after the volume was released independently by the University of Illinois Press to widespread scholarly acclaim, the Church purchased 14,000 copies to distribute to university and public libraries nationwide.

An Overlooked Interlocutor: Claudia Bushman

While Haws’s praise for Bushman is well earned, the volume contains one noticeable lacuna: the lack of sustained engagement with the intellectual influence of Claudia Lauper Bushman. Claudia appears in the opening biographical chapter as Richard’s courtship partner, is noted for raising apostolic eyebrows when she served as editor of Exponent II during Richard’s tenure as a stake president, and receives brief mention in the bibliographic essay.

However, given that Claudia is herself a distinguished historian, an early architect of Mormon feminist studies, and a pioneer of Latter-day Saint women’s history, one would have expected a deeper investigation into how her scholarship and feminist convictions shaped Richard’s own work. In an intellectual marriage spanning over six decades, how did Claudia’s historiographical sensibilities challenge, inform, or refine Richard’s theological and historical frameworks? Exploring their intellectual synergy would have provided a richer, more collaborative portrait of his scholarship and mentoring networks. (Though, I do understand that space in these books are extremely limited.)

Conclusion

For readers like myself, who have felt Bushman’s impact firsthand—whether through the expansive biography of Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling or the personal vulnerability of On the Road with Joseph Smith—Haws’s biography is an illuminating and accessible work. J. B. Haws has given us a concise, fluidly written portrait of a scholar who proved that one could maintain rigorous academic standards without sacrificing devotional loyalty. Richard Lyman Bushman: A Mormon Ambassador is an essential acquisition for scholars of American religious history, Mormon Studies, and any believer seeking an intellectual template for faithful discipleship in an era of historical complexity.


Comments

6 responses to “A Review: Richard Lyman Bushman: A Mormon Ambassador”

  1. Not a Cougar

    Chad, thanks for sharing this. Brother Bushman certainly stands tall among the faithful scholars of the Church. Perhaps J.B. Haws addressed this in the book (or Brother Bushman did himself somewhere else), but I would be interested to hear one of them discuss discuss the impact of his books on the greater Latter-day Saint community. I’m well acquainted with a few people who point to reading Rough Stone Rolling as the point in their lives when they stop believing the Church to be true. Does Brother Bushman feel any responsibility for that? Certainly he seems to have disagreed with President Packer’s assessment that there are things that are true that are not useful.

  2. I think that depends on how one defines “utility.”

  3. Not a Cougar

    Ben, oh most definitely. Would love to know what President Packer would have had to say of RSR (and apologies to Chad for straying a bit from the post’s main theme).

  4. Thanks so much for this review, Chad. Have you read Claudia Bushman’s memoir (I, Claudia)? I’ve begun it, and if you’ve read/reviewed it, interested on your take given the gap mentioned above.

    On the previous comments on the impact of some of RL Bushman’s books, I can imagine the impact going both ways: some people losing testimony because of Rough Stone Rolling and other people feeling like maybe the Church has space for them if someone writing like Bushman feels comfortable within the institution. (That was my experience, and I’m still in the Church, many years hence.) One could imagine that Bushman agreed with Packer’s principle that some things are true but not useful but disagreeing with Packer’s particular judgment as to which things fall into which category.

    I found Bushman’s diary on the year after publishing Rough Stone Rolling (entitled On the Road with Joseph Smith) to be quite insightful, with different leaders of the Church both praising the value of the book and others indicating that it was faith demoting.

  5. I am rereading RSR with my teen age sons and admire the author and his work even more than when I read it when it came. He is a great man and a giant for the faith. Arrington, Bushman, LTU, and Givens are on my Rushmore of faithful post WW2 LDS historians. Grant Hardy is my 5th and Mauss my 6th. Happy to live in an era of faithful and smart academics.

  6. Chad Nielsen

    Not a Cougar, Haws shies away from anything that might put Richard Bushman in a negative light, so he discussed what Bushman was trying to achieve (i.e., innoculation through introducing information) and focused on times that succeeded, though he mentioned general authorities being concerned about it. (And I don’t feel like this is a thread jack to talk about it! I would be interested in what Packer thought too, though I believe he was a driving force in shutting down the history department after encountering Bushman’s earlier work on Joseph Smith.)

    Dave, I have not actually read I, Claudia yet. It’s on my to-do list, but the book came out when Greg Kofford books was going through a transition of its publicists, and getting me a copy fell through the cracks. I haven’t bought a copy yet, but hope to get to it someday.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.