{"id":8437,"date":"2009-05-22T13:54:10","date_gmt":"2009-05-22T18:54:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/?p=8437"},"modified":"2009-05-22T16:03:39","modified_gmt":"2009-05-22T21:03:39","slug":"prop-8-update","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/2009\/05\/prop-8-update\/","title":{"rendered":"Prop 8 Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>From the<a href=\"http:\/\/www.courtinfo.ca.gov\/courts\/supreme\/\"> court&#8217;s own website<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The California Supreme Court has announced that it will issue an opinion in three cases challenging the constitutionality of Proposition 8 at 10 a.m. on Tuesday, May 26, 2009.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I&#8217;ve previously blogged <a href=\"http:\/\/www.concurringopinions.com\/archives\/2009\/03\/prop_8_oral_arg_1.html\">some analysis of the case<\/a>.  Like <a href=\"http:\/\/latimesblogs.latimes.com\/lanow\/2009\/05\/answering-your-questions-about-proposition-8-and-gay-marriage.html\">most other observers<\/a>, I expect that the court will reject both the revision\/amendment challenge and the fundamental rights challenge, but will not retroactively nullify the 18,000 marriages that took place before November (thus grandfathering in those marriages).  That would be, in effect, a partial victory for both sides. <\/p>\n<p>I guess we&#8217;ll find out one way or another this Tuesday.  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From the court&#8217;s own website: The California Supreme Court has announced that it will issue an opinion in three cases challenging the constitutionality of Proposition 8 at 10 a.m. on Tuesday, May 26, 2009. I&#8217;ve previously blogged some analysis of the case. Like most other observers, I expect that the court will reject both the revision\/amendment challenge and the fundamental rights challenge, but will not retroactively nullify the 18,000 marriages that took place before November (thus grandfathering in those marriages). That would be, in effect, a partial victory for both sides. I guess we&#8217;ll find out one way or another this Tuesday.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8437","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-corn"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8437","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8437"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8437\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8439,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8437\/revisions\/8439"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8437"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8437"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8437"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}