{"id":494,"date":"2004-03-04T23:06:28","date_gmt":"2004-03-05T03:06:28","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=494"},"modified":"2009-01-16T17:39:07","modified_gmt":"2009-01-16T21:39:07","slug":"favorite-colmunists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/2004\/03\/favorite-colmunists\/","title":{"rendered":"Favorite Colmunist(s)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s completely off-topic, but I saw <a href=\"http:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/archives\/000488.html#005364\">Greg&#8217;s comment about Maureen Dowd,<\/a> and thought that it might be fun to start a discussion of our favorite, and \/ or least favorite, columnists.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nLike Greg, I&#8217;m not a particularly big fan of many of the NYT crew.  The top of the list is probably Friedman and Kristof, but I wouldn&#8217;t go out of my way to read either of them.  Krugman is very good when talking about economics, and an awful, one-note song when talking about politics &#8212; and he talks about politics far more than he talks about economics.  Safire&#8217;s Magazine column is good, but his op-eds don&#8217;t usually appeal to me.  And as for Maureen Dowd, I think <a href=\"http:\/\/www.weeklystandard.com\/Content\/Public\/Articles\/000\/000\/001\/741snfel.asp\">Josh Chafetz&#8217;s discussion of the &#8220;Immutable Laws of Dowd&#8221;<\/a> sums up many of the problems.<\/p>\n<p>Outside of the NYT, I&#8217;ve liked what I&#8217;ve read by Anne Applebaum (but I must admit I don&#8217;t read all that much of her stuff); I find both Zuckerman and John Leo (U.S. News) to be awful, and Rick Reilly (Sports Illustrated) to be underrated.  Of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/thecorner\/corner.asp\">Corner <\/a>crowd, Jonah is the best, and Derbyshire is clearly the worst (yuck!).  (Derbyshire and the despicable Alexander Cockburn are the two I detest most.)<\/p>\n<p>The really fun question is what line-up I would assemble if I could pick the NYT columnists.  I think I would choose:<\/p>\n<p>1.  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tnr.com\/easterbrook.mhtml\">Gregg Easterbrook<\/a>.  Hands down, the best columnist around today.  Writes a hilarious football column with political asides; writes regularly for the New Republic and The Atlantic (the #2 and #1 magazines in politics, repectively, in my opinion; the Weekly Standard comes in at #3); and he now has a blog which is generally very good too.<\/p>\n<p>2.  <a href=\"http:\/\/eve-tushnet.blogspot.com\/\">Eve Tushnet<\/a>.  She&#8217;s been published a few times &#8212; Weekly Standard, a Jewish World Review column.  She also has a well-known blog.  It&#8217;s clear that she&#8217;s a fantastic writer.<\/p>\n<p>(Yes, my #1 choice is related to a federal judge and my #2 is related to a law professor).  I would substitute those two for Dowd and Brooks in a heartbeat.  <\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a little less clear-cut after those two.  I think I would want to add in Eugene Volokh &#8212; he&#8217;s an excellent writer with broad range and he is not afraid to defend controversial ideas.  Perhaps he could sub out Krugman.  I think Krugman would be an ideal guest columnist.  His economic stuff remains great, but economics doesn&#8217;t provide enough grist for a twice-weekly column, and when he&#8217;s low on econo-grist, he talks (screeches) politics instead.<\/p>\n<p>Others who should be considered (I&#8217;m not exactly sure in what order):  Michael Kinsley, Christopher Hitchens, Larry Lessig, Nate Oman, <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.qiken.org\/\">Heidi Bond<\/a>, Dahlia Lithwick, Josh Marshall.  (Maybe <a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\">Slate<\/a> should just take over the NYT op-ed page).  I used to like both Andrew Sullivan and Mickey Kaus a lot more, but in my opinion they both got less interesting when they became hawks &#8212; Andrew Sullivan is at his best writing about culture, not war.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s completely off-topic, but I saw Greg&#8217;s comment about Maureen Dowd, and thought that it might be fun to start a discussion of our favorite, and \/ or least favorite, columnists.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-494","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-corn"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/494","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=494"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/494\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5816,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/494\/revisions\/5816"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=494"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=494"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=494"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}