{"id":4670,"date":"2008-07-21T09:38:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-21T13:38:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/?p=4670"},"modified":"2009-01-19T18:06:41","modified_gmt":"2009-01-19T22:06:41","slug":"call-for-papers-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/2008\/07\/call-for-papers-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Call for Papers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>CALL FOR PAPERS<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Reconciliations and Reformulations&#8221;:<br \/>\nA Conference for LDS Graduate Students in Religious Studies<br \/>\nHarvard University, February 20-21, 2009<\/p>\n<p>Many Latter-day Saints experience their scholarship and their religion as<br \/>\nclashing cultures, each with its competing values and contradictory<br \/>\nconclusions. Religious studies students especially struggle to reconcile their<br \/>\nfaith and the knowledge they acquire in graduate school. The forms this<br \/>\nreconciliation take?including the failure to achieve reconciliation?become<br \/>\ncrucial episodes in a student?s life history.  The purpose of the Faith and<br \/>\nKnowledge Conference for 2009 is to provide a forum for exploring these<br \/>\nattempts at reconciliation.<\/p>\n<p>We invite paper proposals from graduate students in religious studies and other<br \/>\nrelated fields in the following four categories:<\/p>\n<p>I.  Gender and Sexuality<br \/>\nThe academic discipline of religion is interacting more and more with<br \/>\nmethodologies and theories borrowed from gender and sexuality studies.  As LDS<br \/>\nscholars, to what extent do we engage in or disregard these methodologies?  Can<br \/>\nwe take more expansive views of homosexuality, feminism, and other related<br \/>\nissues than Mormon theology traditionally does without compromising our faith?<br \/>\nCan feminist theology, queer theory, and similar approaches be useful to LDS<br \/>\nscholars or must they be rejected altogether?  How do more traditional<br \/>\nviewpoints inform our academic scholarship, and how may the more expansive<br \/>\ncontemporary views of such issues inform both our academic scholarship and our<br \/>\nunderstanding of the Gospel? Is reconciliation possible (or even needed)<br \/>\nbetween these academic paradigms and the faith of the LDS scholar?<\/p>\n<p>II.  Scripture<br \/>\nLDS scholars commonly perceive a tension between ?academic? and<br \/>\n?devotional? approaches to scripture.  Can scholarly methodologies (the<br \/>\nhistorical-critical method, literary criticism, etc.) be usefully incorporated<br \/>\ninto the study or interpretation of LDS scripture, both ancient and modern, or<br \/>\nmust they be abandoned or subordinated to faith-based understandings?  What<br \/>\ninvestments do LDS scholars of scripture bring to the academic table and in<br \/>\nwhat ways do they manifest themselves in productive or unproductive ways in LDS<br \/>\nscholarship?  Can academic approaches to the Bible be helpful in the study of<br \/>\nrevealed scripture, and if so, do they require some kinds of reconciliations or<br \/>\ntransformations?  Is there and\/or should there be a unique LDS scriptural<br \/>\nhermeneutic, and what would it look like?<\/p>\n<p>III.  Pluralism<br \/>\nThe approaches of religions to their own truth-claims may be divided into three<br \/>\ncategories:  exclusivist religions, which assert that theirs is the sole bearer<br \/>\nof truth and salvation; inclusivist religions, which recognize that other<br \/>\ntraditions possess enough truth to qualify them for salvation; and finally,<br \/>\npluralist religions, which hold that all traditions are equal paths to God.  In<br \/>\na time of globalization, Latter-day Saint interactions with other religions,<br \/>\nboth Christian and non-Christian, raise questions about our view of ourselves.<br \/>\nAs we learn to appreciate the depth of other religious traditions, we wonder if<br \/>\nour exclusivist view on truth is sustainable and defensible. How do we react to<br \/>\nthe theological and political dilemmas that exclusive claims to salvation<br \/>\nthrough Jesus Christ or through Mormon rituals entail? Can a Mormon pluralism<br \/>\nexist, or must we take on the burden of exclusivism?<\/p>\n<p>IV.  The Place of Religious Scholarship in the Church<br \/>\nReligious scholars and scholarship occupy an ambiguous role in the Church.<br \/>\nReligious scholarship is cited when it supports Church teachings but rejected<br \/>\nwhen it suggests that Church positions may be problematic.  Moreover, the<br \/>\nscholar who raises questions of this find falls under suspicion.  Given current<br \/>\nChurch culture, what can an LDS scholar of religion bring to the table?  Can a<br \/>\nscholar utilize his\/her tools and scholarship in a pastoral role?  Can LDS<br \/>\nreligious scholars work to remove the stigma in the Church associated with the<br \/>\nacademic study of religion ? and especially the academic study of Mormonism?<br \/>\nSpecifically, in what ways can areas of religious scholarship contribute<br \/>\npositively to the spiritual and cultural life of the Church?<\/p>\n<p>Panelist papers or presentations should last approximately 10 to 15 minutes.<br \/>\nShort proposals (no more than 250 words) should be submitted via the conference<br \/>\nwebsite (http:\/\/www.faithandknowledge.org\/submissions.php) by OCTOBER 1, 2008.<br \/>\nPresenters will be notified by December 1, 2008.  Conference participants will<br \/>\nbe eligible to apply for financial assistance with travel and lodging expenses.<br \/>\nPlease send further inquiries about to the conference to<br \/>\norg@faithandknowledge.org.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4670","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-mormon-studies"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4670","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4670"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4670\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6295,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4670\/revisions\/6295"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4670"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4670"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4670"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}