![\"\"](\"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/scranney_Married_Mormon_couple_photorealistic_c9bf9dc4-8cbe-4984-b774-5a3f4649f29b-800x800.png\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Midjourney’s interpretation of “Married Mormon couple.” It’s uncanny how well it visually taps into stereotype.<\/i><\/p>\n
Deseret News published another piece of mine<\/span><\/a>, this time about evidence that shows that, contrary to conventional wisdom, religious people report more satisfying sex lives. So now for my post-game, more casual, more speculative blogosphere analysis.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n First off. Yes, I did check, and no, it doesn\u2019t look like Latter-day Saints have better or worse sex lives on average, but this isn\u2019t surprising since there were so few of them in the sample I was using that the effect would have to have been huge for me to pick it up.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n I suspect some of the finding that religious people have better sex lives is because religious people have rose-colored glasses about things in general. I\u2019m open to the possibility that highly sex-negative, religious upbringings could affect sexual functioning, especially in women, and I would not be surprised if some future research found that certain types of early-life religiosity are associated with aorgasmia, for example (but would also not be surprised if there was no such effect; a lot of people have sexual hang-ups, not just religious people).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n However, I still suspect that a conservative Church upbringing is a net positive. For every person who can\u2019t switch into marital sexy mode after a teenagerhood of chastity lessons, there\u2019s another one whose religious upbringing helped them avoid highly negative early life sexual experiences, where the structure and expectations provided by religion allowed them to develop their sexuality in a loving, secure, context.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n I suspect the advantages of the latter will become even more pointed as the digital alternatives become more available and tempting as technology develops. As I\u2019ve already spoken about at great length in several posts, for those disposed towards pornography use, <\/span>secular anti-pornography arguments<\/span><\/a> fall a little flat in a contemporary zeitgeist that emphasizes sexual authenticity. If the gay returned missionary who marries a man is being authentic to his sexual self, then so too is the highly sociosexual 20-year old heterosexual sitting in his basement watching pornography.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n In the past the latter case had an outlet, gradually developed across history layer by sociocultural layer, that vectored their desires into a partnered relationship that in turn entailed adopting various responsibilities. (Of course, that\u2019s not to say that that\u2019s all there was, but it was a big part).\u00a0<\/span>Of course, all of the sudden there\u2019s now a short-cut and, <\/span>as I\u2019ve written about at greater length<\/span><\/a> in <\/span>two other pieces<\/span><\/a>, the digital replacements for the real thing are going to become more and more of an issue as technology develops.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n So what does this mean for the future of partnered sexual satisfaction among the religious?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n First, I suspect the highly insular setting required for intense religious guilting is a thing of the past. In addition to the fact that people are less religious, it\u2019s just much harder to maintain the \u201csacred canopy\u201d anymore where you can tightly control your children\u2019s environment. I think this was inevitable, and I\u2019m not saying it\u2019s all bad. It just is what it is.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n At the same time, as the <\/span>Carrie<\/span><\/i>-type, ultra-religious guilting becomes more of a thing of the past, the sexual structure provided by religion will become more distinctive in a landscape with little in way of structure and a lot in way of options. Consequently, I suspect the religious advantage in partnered sexual satisfaction will become increasingly pronounced. <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Midjourney’s interpretation of “Married Mormon couple.” It’s uncanny how well it visually taps into stereotype. Deseret News published another piece of mine, this time about evidence that shows that, contrary to conventional wisdom, religious people report more satisfying sex lives. So now for my post-game, more casual, more speculative blogosphere analysis.\u00a0 First off. Yes, I did check, and no, it doesn\u2019t look like Latter-day Saints have better or worse sex lives on average, but this isn\u2019t surprising since there were so few of them in the sample I was using that the effect would have to have been huge for me to pick it up.\u00a0 I suspect some of the finding that religious people have better sex lives is because religious people have rose-colored glasses about things in general. I\u2019m open to the possibility that highly sex-negative, religious upbringings could affect sexual functioning, especially in women, and I would not be surprised if some future research found that certain types of early-life religiosity are associated with aorgasmia, for example (but would also not be surprised if there was no such effect; a lot of people have sexual hang-ups, not just religious people).\u00a0 However, I still suspect that a conservative Church […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10403,"featured_media":46050,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-46046","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-social-sciences-and-economics"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/scranney_Married_Mormon_couple_photorealistic_c9bf9dc4-8cbe-4984-b774-5a3f4649f29b.png","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46046","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10403"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=46046"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46046\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":46055,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46046\/revisions\/46055"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/46050"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=46046"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=46046"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=46046"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}