{"id":42934,"date":"2022-05-08T18:29:42","date_gmt":"2022-05-08T23:29:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/?p=42934"},"modified":"2025-05-26T08:21:59","modified_gmt":"2025-05-26T14:21:59","slug":"the-future-and-the-church-part-vi-the-future-of-religion-worldwide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/2022\/05\/the-future-and-the-church-part-vi-the-future-of-religion-worldwide\/","title":{"rendered":"The Future and the Church, Part VI: The Future of Religion Worldwide"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-42951 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/cbab5a62a0d811aa2802f32710c9817b.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"309\" height=\"309\" srcset=\"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/cbab5a62a0d811aa2802f32710c9817b.jpg 225w, https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/cbab5a62a0d811aa2802f32710c9817b-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/cbab5a62a0d811aa2802f32710c9817b-160x160.jpg 160w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 309px) 100vw, 309px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cThe Future of Religion\u201d is one of those big picture questions that has been addressed by a wide variety of intellectuals such as Freud, Rorty, and basically every European intellectual in the 19th century. (The fact that the end of religion has been right around the corner for more than a century now doesn\u2019t help one\u2019s confidence in predictions of its demise).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">While grand narrative, direction-of-history discussions are fun, they should not take the place of more rigorous data-driven estimates when such are available. (Incidentally, this happened with the Democratic Party in the US when they strongly relied on a demographically naive \u201cdirection of history\u201d narrative to assume they would effortless dominate US politics in the future without, you know, actually talking to a political demographer, but I digress.)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the past two decades some demographers have started to project religious groups like they would project the population of a country. Projections rely on three forces: births, deaths, and migration, projections of religions just switch out migrations for conversion to or away from \u201creligious switching.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Unfortunately, Latter-day Saints are too small to really do a demographic projection for without the Church\u2019s in-house data, but there have been various insightful projections for major world religions<a href=\"https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/religion\/2015\/04\/02\/religious-projections-2010-2050\/\"> by Pew<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/j.1468-5906.2010.01510.x?casa_token=baiuI_FZ-b4AAAAA:OKEYL7fH5vkD5YRFo40605ECEn_CALp1S8OVCpv1UgLIHYVC-vegRRca-JIU84MO3OPHdYpQKFr8jk0\">as well<\/a> as <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/pdf\/41428357.pdf?casa_token=fgZb1urRQCIAAAAA:vNJO43mcG0t7ohQvVHHcqeToaB7CsHwXhYIMcKYgDHVmeW0ybjyOsxkgWSlc_EJL3RHYdAnWE5nzu4zyE6c_SxnatmHvyypF4yYdZacQtHAOi393XXo\">other researchers<\/a>. While there are a lot of assumptions that are baked into these projections, they\u2019re the most rigorous that we have.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To summarize: while many people leave religion, the fact that secular people have hardly any children means the share of the non-religious will shrink worldwide over the next couple of decades, although the secular share will probably increase in some pockets like the US, but even there the best estimate is that the percent secular will peak and then start to decline.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On the other hand, religiosity is connected to economic development, and if technology progresses to a degree that we see worldwide economic development (hopefully!), that may lead to a decline in religiosity globally, but that&#8217;s hard to predict. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So what does this mean for the Church? As I\u2019ve mentioned before, the Church is declining in places that are declining, and growing in places that are growing. In terms of fundamentals for growth it doesn\u2019t get any more solid than that. However, the background society for the Church\u2019s center in the US will continue to become more secular, so for us US members it will look like all those intellectuals were right about the future of religion as it becomes less and less relevant in society. However, that is a very short-term, localized view.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">According to these projections by 2050 Islam will be about the same size as Christianity, and in many Islamic contexts proselytizing a Christian faith is taboo, to put it gently, so the expansion of faith in some contexts may not help the Church\u2019s growth. Once again, the big story here is Africa. By 2050 4 out of 10 Christians will be in Africa. As a potential missionary field Sub-Saharan Africa will probably continue to explode population-wise (although how long their population will continue to explode is a matter of fierce debate in the demography community).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Finally, taking a more big picture, long future approach, from twin studies we know that religiosity is at least somewhat genetic, as are one\u2019s desires to have children. Consequently, inasmuch as religiosity is at least partially biologically engrained, in this world of widespread contraception it\u2019s possible that we may actually evolve as a species towards religion (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1080\/19485565.2016.1212322\">a paper I published<\/a> looked at some of the speculative math behind evolving towards higher fertility), but of course this is very speculative.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So to summarize, religion is not dying, even if it might look like it in certain cafes and cities.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cThe Future of Religion\u201d is one of those big picture questions that has been addressed by a wide variety of intellectuals such as Freud, Rorty, and basically every European intellectual in the 19th century. (The fact that the end of religion has been right around the corner for more than a century now doesn\u2019t help one\u2019s confidence in predictions of its demise).\u00a0 While grand narrative, direction-of-history discussions are fun, they should not take the place of more rigorous data-driven estimates when such are available. (Incidentally, this happened with the Democratic Party in the US when they strongly relied on a demographically naive \u201cdirection of history\u201d narrative to assume they would effortless dominate US politics in the future without, you know, actually talking to a political demographer, but I digress.) In the past two decades some demographers have started to project religious groups like they would project the population of a country. Projections rely on three forces: births, deaths, and migration, projections of religions just switch out migrations for conversion to or away from \u201creligious switching.\u201d\u00a0 Unfortunately, Latter-day Saints are too small to really do a demographic projection for without the Church\u2019s in-house data, but there have been various insightful projections [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10403,"featured_media":42951,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42934","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-social-sciences-and-economics"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/cbab5a62a0d811aa2802f32710c9817b.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42934","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10403"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42934"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42934\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":50115,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42934\/revisions\/50115"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/42951"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42934"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42934"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42934"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}