{"id":39616,"date":"2020-01-23T12:36:20","date_gmt":"2020-01-23T17:36:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/?p=39616"},"modified":"2020-01-23T12:36:20","modified_gmt":"2020-01-23T17:36:20","slug":"the-humbling-of-the-kingdom","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/2020\/01\/the-humbling-of-the-kingdom\/","title":{"rendered":"The humbling of the kingdom?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In Matthew 13, Jesus compares the kingdom of heaven to a mustard seed which, though tiny, grows into a tree in which the birds can nest. A verse later, Jesus compares the kingdom to yeast that the baker \u201chid\u201d in a loaf of bread, causing the bread to rise. The comparisons seem to reflect quite different conceptions. In one, the kingdom is large and conspicuous, visibly structuring and supporting those who knowingly depend on it. In the other, the kingdom is a tiny and mostly imperceptible part of the mix. It is not and will never become a very substantial part of the product: the bread will be mostly composed of flour, sugar, water. Not of yeast\u2013 a loaf of bread consisting mostly of yeast would be inedible. And yet the yeast\u2013 and the kingdom?\u2013 will have an essential influence that permeates the whole, quietly lifting and sustaining it.<\/p>\n<p>From the outset, it seems, in thinking of the Latter-day kingdom, Church members have embraced the mustard seed\/tree conception. Expectations were high, even grandiose. A striking instance is the proclamation written by the Twelve Apostles in 1845 and addressed &#8220;To all the kings of the world, to the president of the United States of America; to the governors of the several states and to the rulers and people of all nations.&#8221; The proclamation in effect audaciously announced, and demanded acknowledgment of, a new sovereign. \u201cTherefore we send unto you with authority from on high, and command you all to repent and humble yourselves as little children . . . .\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Another common scriptural metaphor expressing a similar idea is Daniel\u2019s description of the \u201cstone cut out of the mountain\u201d that rolls forth and fills the whole earth. I myself recall giving an enthusiastic missionary talk on the theme, and I recall a stake leader thanking me for my \u201cdiscurso vibrante.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>That was decades ago. And the proclamation to kings and rulers was issued more than a century and a half ago. Now, in what has been declared the bicentennial of the Restoration, we might pause and wonder whether this vision of our role remains plausible.<\/p>\n<p>True, the Church has endured, and grown. It has blessed the lives of millions of people, in all sorts of ways. And I suppose that in a sense the Restored Gospel has rolled forth and if not exactly \u201cfilled\u201d at least established a presence in, if not the whole earth, at least the non-totalitarian portions of it. Missionaries have served in most countries. Temples are being built throughout the world. These are impressive achievements, for which we can be thankful. And yet . . . .<\/p>\n<p>Realistically, the Church remains an important but still quite marginal actor on the national and world stage. Its percentage of the national and world populations is still, and now seems likely to remain, tiny. It may be mentioned in general history books but will not be credited with any impact matching that of, say, the abolition or women\u2019s or civil right movements. Or the Russian Revolution: not even close. Is this what our ancestors contemplated when they talked of the stone that would fill the whole earth, crushing all before it?<\/p>\n<p>I don\u2019t know what the future holds, of course, or what the providential plan may be. The information\u2019s unavailable to the mortal man\u2013 or at least to me. Still, I wonder whether it might be apt at this point to begin thinking of the Church less in tree and stone imagery and more in terms of leaven that quietly and inconspicuously sustains and lifts the loaf.<\/p>\n<p>What would such a shift entail? The implications would be far-reaching, I suspect, and I can only notice a couple of possibilities here. One specific area affected by the change has already been mentioned\u2013 missionary work. The older image suggests that the aspiration is to convert the world. But is this a realistic aspiration? Is it even an attractive one? Just as a loaf of bread made entirely of yeast would be inedible, is the prospect of a whole world that looks like, say, Provo pleasant to contemplate? I\u2019m joking, of course (and in fact I have mostly fond memories of my years in Provo). But still. . . . Maybe the primary goal should not be to convert the world, but rather to humbly serve the world?<\/p>\n<p>My sense is that members themselves have long worked more according to this sensibility\u2013 which is why so many of us are wary of enthusiastic missionaries who want to come over for dinner and afterwards commit us to proselytize all of our friends\u2013 and that the Church itself has moved in this direction. When I was a missionary (in a somewhat dysfunctional mission, to be sure, with grotesquely high baptism rates coupled with discouraging retention rates) we were instructed that we should not do service, or even visit newly baptized members, unless we could expect more baptisms to result. Today, in my ward at least, the missionaries seem eager to do service. And of course there are now thousands of service missionaries; I\u2019ve had occasion to work with some of them, whose service has been valuable. This is all to the good, I think.<\/p>\n<p>The larger, harder question is how a shift from tree to yeast might lead to revisions in our overall narrative. The standard way of explaining\u2013 and distinguishing\u2013 our Church relies heavily on the Great Apostasy-Restoration theme. This is a tree story, I think\u2013 or a story about the stone that fills the whole earth. To use a different analogy: it is a spectacular instance of \u201cWhig history\u201d\u2013 of the idea that nearly everything important that happened over the last two millennia was all teleologically leading up to . . . Us. To be sure, I don\u2019t think a particular understanding can be discredited just by calling it \u201cWhig history\u201d any more than it can be discredited just by labeling it a \u201cconspiracy theory.\u201d If the Church had grown to fill the earth in the way the proclamation of 1845 seemed to contemplate, the Whiggish self-understanding would have been vindicated. But that hasn\u2019t happened, and it doesn\u2019t seem likely to happen.<\/p>\n<p>My sense is that Apostasy and Restoration are so deeply entrenched in our self-understanding that they are never going to be discarded. But might there be interpretations of apostasy and restoration that resonate more with a yeast conception of our role\u2013 that might allow us to perform a leavening function in a way that is not oriented from the outset in an intrinsically triumphalist mode?<\/p>\n<p>Let me put the point more generally: the tree conception implies that the kingdom will become the world\u2019s supporting structure. The stone analogy suggests that the kingdom is going to crush and replace sovereigns and sects. Subtly or not so subtly, these conceptions shape our attitudes toward the world, and toward Christianity generally. And in fact a triumphalist and thus implicitly or explicitly adversarial attitude probably has dominated our thinking through much of our history\u2014even when we try to be genial and polite. But things seem to be changing of late. The Prophet meets cordially with the Pope, who would once have been viewed as the leader of the great and abominable church. We minister and serve cordially with our Protestant brothers and sisters, and with adherents of other faiths. Is it time to rethink our self-understanding in a way that is humbler in its pretensions and aspirations but more conducive to these collaborative efforts?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Matthew 13, Jesus compares the kingdom of heaven to a mustard seed which, though tiny, grows into a tree in which the birds can nest. A verse later, Jesus compares the kingdom to yeast that the baker \u201chid\u201d in a loaf of bread, causing the bread to rise. The comparisons seem to reflect quite different conceptions. In one, the kingdom is large and conspicuous, visibly structuring and supporting those who knowingly depend on it. In the other, the kingdom is a tiny and mostly imperceptible part of the mix. It is not and will never become a very substantial part of the product: the bread will be mostly composed of flour, sugar, water. Not of yeast\u2013 a loaf of bread consisting mostly of yeast would be inedible. And yet the yeast\u2013 and the kingdom?\u2013 will have an essential influence that permeates the whole, quietly lifting and sustaining it. From the outset, it seems, in thinking of the Latter-day kingdom, Church members have embraced the mustard seed\/tree conception. Expectations were high, even grandiose. A striking instance is the proclamation written by the Twelve Apostles in 1845 and addressed &#8220;To all the kings of the world, to the president of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":134,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[55],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-39616","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news-politics"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39616","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/134"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39616"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39616\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":39627,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39616\/revisions\/39627"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39616"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39616"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39616"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}