{"id":38682,"date":"2019-02-19T10:22:25","date_gmt":"2019-02-19T15:22:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/?p=38682"},"modified":"2019-02-19T10:22:25","modified_gmt":"2019-02-19T15:22:25","slug":"faith-in-a-secular-age","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/2019\/02\/faith-in-a-secular-age\/","title":{"rendered":"Faith in a Secular Age"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>I&#8217;m pleased today to share a guest post from friend of the blog, Samuel Morris Brown. A related\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/wheatley.byu.edu\/faith-in-a-secular-age\/\">symposium<\/a> on &#8220;Faith in a Secular Age&#8221; will be held March 1 &amp; 2 at Brigham Young University. Sam Brown, myself, and T&amp;S emeriti Nate Oman and Jim Faulconer, together with other fine scholars, will speak. The symposium is free and open to the public.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p id=\"E46\"><span id=\"E47\">We live in an odd time. <\/span><span id=\"E48\">Most of us feel that something big is happening, something that matters<\/span><span id=\"E49\">. <\/span><span id=\"E50\">What we identify as the oddity may be as variable as our interpretations of a Rorschach inkblot. Culturally we think something that started a half-century again has sped up in the last quarter century<\/span><span id=\"E51\">. <\/span><span id=\"E52\">After the Great Recession and the fitful return to <\/span><span id=\"E53\">social <\/span><span id=\"E54\">prominence of certain nativist strands\u2014coupled with increasing radicalization on the Left\u2014<\/span><span id=\"E55\">many of us<\/span><span id=\"E56\"> sense that we are in a desperate muddle politically as well.<\/span><span id=\"E57\"> More to the point, many of us find that the language we might use to describe both the situation and possible paths out of current logjams seems to have shifted out from under us as well.<\/span><span id=\"E58\"> There appears <\/span><span id=\"E59\">now <\/span><span id=\"E60\">to be <\/span><span id=\"E61\">mist<\/span><span id=\"E62\"> where once there was solid ground.<\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"E64\"><span id=\"E65\">For religious <\/span><span id=\"E66\">people<\/span><span id=\"E67\">\u2014<\/span><span id=\"E68\">those who bear the weight of an adjective whose meaning is also in the midst of <\/span><span id=\"E69\">great <\/span><span id=\"E70\">change<\/span><span id=\"E71\">\u2014<\/span><span id=\"E72\">these times may seem <\/span><span id=\"E73\">especially<\/span><span id=\"E74\"> rough.<\/span><span id=\"E75\"> Assumptions of many generations in the US about the nature of religion and religious community seem to be shifting.<\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"E77\"><span id=\"E78\">When I listen to the rhetoric on both prominent sides, it seems to me that they are missing something<\/span><span id=\"E79\"> crucial<\/span><span id=\"E80\">. <\/span><span id=\"E81\">What, exactly, was missing wasn\u2019t clear to me until I got around to reading <\/span><span id=\"E82\">the writings of the Canadian philosopher <\/span><span id=\"E83\">Charles <\/span><span id=\"E85\">Taylor.<\/span><span id=\"E87\"> After <\/span><span id=\"E88\">slogging through<\/span><span id=\"E89\"> his massive <\/span><em><span id=\"E90\">A Secular Age<\/span><\/em><span id=\"E91\"> and the related works (most accessible, I <\/span><span id=\"E92\">believe<\/span><span id=\"E93\">, in his <\/span><span id=\"E94\">published lecture <\/span><em><span id=\"E95\">A Catholic Modernity?<\/span><\/em><span id=\"E96\"> or in Jamie Smith\u2019s SparkNotes-style <\/span><em><span id=\"E97\">How (Not) to Be Secular<\/span><\/em><span id=\"E98\">)<\/span><span id=\"E99\">, I saw <\/span><span id=\"E100\">the <\/span><span id=\"E101\">problems<\/span><span id=\"E102\"> anew<\/span><span id=\"E103\">. It\u2019s rare that one\u2019s mind is changed, not just about some specific topic, but about a broader framework for understanding the world.<\/span><span id=\"E104\"> Mine was.<\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"E106\"><span id=\"E107\">Taylor introduced a genealogy of sorts for the sensibilities that command the greatest allegiance for those of us prone to want to belong <\/span><span id=\"E108\">with<\/span><span id=\"E109\">in the Western intelligentsia. He distinguished the theological disputes from the empirical questions that sociologists and political <\/span><span id=\"E111\">scientists<\/span><span id=\"E113\"> debate\u2014how many people go to church, and how should \u201cchurch\u201d and \u201cstate\u201d interact? <\/span><span id=\"E114\">Instead of sticking with the sociologi<\/span><span id=\"E115\">cal perspectives<\/span><span id=\"E116\">, <\/span><span id=\"E117\">he brought the theological debates into rare clarity. Both religious and anti-religious are secular<\/span><span id=\"E118\">;<\/span><span id=\"E119\"> secularism is, fundamentally, a diffused, Protestant sectarian movement<\/span><span id=\"E120\">;<\/span><span id=\"E121\"> and modern scientism is neither scientifically nor historically necessary. Also, centrally, secularity as we experience it now has a great deal to do with identity, community, and new ideas about what it is to be our <\/span><span id=\"E122\">selves<\/span><span id=\"E123\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"E125\"><span id=\"E126\">Taylor<\/span><span id=\"E127\">\u2019s work<\/span><span id=\"E128\"> generated more questions than answers, as a good thinker <\/span><span id=\"E129\">usually<\/span><span id=\"E130\"> does.<\/span><span id=\"E131\"> He provided an infrastructure for asking productive questions with some hope of resulting clarity.<\/span><span id=\"E132\"> I\u2019ve spent the last five years <\/span><span id=\"E133\">thinking through my own experiences and faith tradition from <\/span><span id=\"E134\">within his conceptual system<\/span><span id=\"E135\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span id=\"E138\">I started to realize that<\/span><span id=\"E139\"> the <\/span><span id=\"E140\">large<\/span><span id=\"E141\"> majority of <\/span><span id=\"E142\">contemporary<\/span><span id=\"E143\"> bones of contention<\/span> made much more sense when mapped onto Taylor\u2019s concepts of secularity and selfhood. Taylor\u2019s thought gave me language for making sense of the conflicts and cross-pressures that <span id=\"E145\">so many of us<\/span><span id=\"E146\"> experience these days. I decided it might be useful to get that conversation going in a more sustained and serious way.<\/span><span id=\"E147\"> Current debates about religion feel in some respects quite blind on both sides, and I\u2019ve come to worry that these failures of clear-seeing are having a negative effect on our faith communities and ourselves.<\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"E149\"><span id=\"E150\">I spoke with Miranda Wilcox and Jim <\/span><span id=\"E152\">Faulconer<\/span><span id=\"E154\">, two <\/span><span id=\"E155\">heroes of mine<\/span><span id=\"E156\"> in the LDS <\/span><span id=\"E157\">intellectual community<\/span><span id=\"E158\">, and we agreed <\/span><span id=\"E159\">to stage<\/span><span id=\"E160\"> a conference <\/span><span id=\"E161\">that brought together thinkers from within faith traditions<\/span><span id=\"E162\">. We wanted<\/span><span id=\"E163\"> to consider the various elements relevant to understanding ourselves in this late-modern world<\/span><span id=\"E164\">. We worked <\/span><span id=\"E165\">together with the Wheatley Institut<\/span><span id=\"E166\">ion<\/span><span id=\"E167\"> with assistance from the Maxwell Institute<\/span><span id=\"E168\"> to find the right venue <\/span><span id=\"E169\">for this work<\/span><span id=\"E170\">.<\/span><span id=\"E171\"> The conference<\/span><span id=\"E172\">, \u201cFaith in a Secular Age,\u201d<\/span><span id=\"E173\"> will be held March 1-2 on BYU campus. The speakers are among the bright lights of their respective intellectual and faith traditions. They include medievalists, lawyers, philosophers, religious historians, and theologians.<\/span><span id=\"E174\"> I\u2019m the token quantitative scientist, although I\u2019m presenting from the perspective of religious history and theology.<\/span><span id=\"E175\"> We represent a politically diverse group of academics from across the spectrum usually weighed down by the \u201cleft\u201d and \u201cright\u201d labels on the tails.<\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"E177\"><span id=\"E178\">In this conference we wanted to have both Catholic and LDS thinkers engag<\/span><span id=\"E179\">e<\/span><span id=\"E180\"> weighty questions<\/span><span id=\"E181\"> that matter<\/span><span id=\"E182\">. <\/span><span id=\"E183\">We hope<\/span><span id=\"E184\"> that the talks will be thought-provoking<\/span><span id=\"E185\">, even, occasionally, scandalous in the happy and healthful sense of the word<\/span><span id=\"E186\">. We did not <\/span><span id=\"E187\">ask the speakers<\/span><span id=\"E188\"> <\/span><span id=\"E189\">to focus on <\/span><span id=\"E190\">immediate practical <\/span><span id=\"E191\">applications for our faith community<\/span><span id=\"E192\">. We thought we <\/span><span id=\"E193\">should <\/span><span id=\"E194\">clarify what the key questions are at a <\/span><span id=\"E195\">more foundational<\/span><span id=\"E196\"> level. We are planning to do this in public view and are mindful of <\/span><span id=\"E197\">a broad <\/span><span id=\"E198\">audience<\/span><span id=\"E199\"> as we <\/span><span id=\"E200\">prepare<\/span><span id=\"E201\"> our <\/span><span id=\"E202\">talks<\/span><span id=\"E203\">. We\u2019re hopeful that the ideas presented <\/span><span id=\"E204\">at <\/span><em><span id=\"E205\">Faith in a Secular Age<\/span><\/em><span id=\"E206\"> will <\/span><span id=\"E207\">over time find their way into practical strategies<\/span><span id=\"E208\"> to expand goodness and light<\/span><span id=\"E209\">, but we thought understanding should come before action<\/span><span id=\"E210\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"E212\"><span id=\"E213\">There\u2019s much that\u2019s good and much that\u2019s bad in late-modern secularity. What\u2019s most concerning is the unquestioned status of key aspects of that secularity, among religious, non-religious, and anti-religious folk. We\u2019re hopeful that this conference (most but not all of the talks will be video-recorded and later released onto the internet, and versions of the talks, revised for print<\/span><span id=\"E214\"> with a more academic audience in mind<\/span><span id=\"E215\">, will be ultimately published in a conference proceedings) will help shift the conversations toward greater clarity. <\/span><span id=\"E216\">We\u2019re hopeful that <\/span><span id=\"E217\">we <\/span><span id=\"E218\">can <\/span><span id=\"E219\">thus <\/span><span id=\"E220\">contribute <\/span><span id=\"E221\">our intellectual <\/span><span id=\"E222\">widow<\/span><span id=\"E223\">\u2019<\/span><span id=\"E224\">s mite to the treasures of heaven.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m pleased today to share a guest post from friend of the blog, Samuel Morris Brown. A related\u00a0symposium on &#8220;Faith in a Secular Age&#8221; will be held March 1 &amp; 2 at Brigham Young University. Sam Brown, myself, and T&amp;S emeriti Nate Oman and Jim Faulconer, together with other fine scholars, will speak. The symposium is free and open to the public.\u00a0 &nbsp; We live in an odd time. Most of us feel that something big is happening, something that matters. What we identify as the oddity may be as variable as our interpretations of a Rorschach inkblot. Culturally we think something that started a half-century again has sped up in the last quarter century. After the Great Recession and the fitful return to social prominence of certain nativist strands\u2014coupled with increasing radicalization on the Left\u2014many of us sense that we are in a desperate muddle politically as well. More to the point, many of us find that the language we might use to describe both the situation and possible paths out of current logjams seems to have shifted out from under us as well. There appears now to be mist where once there was solid ground. For religious people\u2014those [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":42,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[55],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38682","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news-politics"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38682","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/42"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38682"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38682\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38683,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38682\/revisions\/38683"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38682"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38682"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38682"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}