{"id":33456,"date":"2015-06-30T07:53:49","date_gmt":"2015-06-30T12:53:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/?p=33456"},"modified":"2015-06-22T10:23:10","modified_gmt":"2015-06-22T15:23:10","slug":"new-testament-gospel-doctrine-lesson-27","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/2015\/06\/new-testament-gospel-doctrine-lesson-27\/","title":{"rendered":"New Testament Gospel Doctrine Lesson #27"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em><a href=\"http:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/scriptures-resurrection-758817-print.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"  wp-image-32418 alignleft\" src=\"http:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/scriptures-resurrection-758817-print-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"scriptures-resurrection-758817-print\" width=\"237\" height=\"158\" srcset=\"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/scriptures-resurrection-758817-print-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/scriptures-resurrection-758817-print-1024x682.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/scriptures-resurrection-758817-print.jpg 1600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 237px) 100vw, 237px\" \/><\/a>So here\u2019s the plan: each week that the gospels are covered in Sunday School, I will post\u00a0one question from my book along with a brief discussion of the issues that it raises.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Most ancient manuscripts of Mark end after 16:8 and early Christians do not seem to know any of this chapter after verse 8. The style, vocabulary, and themes in Mark 16:9\u201320 are quite different from the rest of Mark. Therefore, the vast majority of scholars believe that the Gospel of Mark originally ended with verse 8 and that verses 9\u201320 are a later addition by another author. It is also possible that the original ending (any material after verse 8) was somehow lost. Suppose for a moment that, as most scholars believe, the Gospel did originally end after verse 8. Why did Mark write such an abrupt ending? What effect does it have on you as a reader?\u00a0<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>(adapted from <a href=\"http:\/\/gregkofford.com\/products\/jsmith-gospels\">Search, Ponder, and Pray: A Guide to the Gospels<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>If you want more information about the ending of Mark, you can read <a href=\"http:\/\/www.byunewtestamentcommentary.com\/the-ending-of-marks-gospel\/\">this<\/a>. (Even the new Institute manual mentions this issue <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lds.org\/manual\/new-testament-student-manual\/introduction-to-mark\/chapter-14?lang=eng\">here<\/a>.) This might seem a petty issue to focus on in a lesson that is about the resurrection of Jesus Christ, but stay with me for a moment. While it is possible that the original ending to Mark is now lost, think for a moment about what it would mean if Mark deliberately ended the gospel with the words &#8220;And they went out quickly, and fled from the sepulchre; for they trembled and were amazed: neither said they any thing to any <span class=\"clarityWord\">man;<\/span> for they were afraid.&#8221; No resurrection appearance. Just these disciples leaving in fear. Why would Mark do this?<\/p>\n<p>Recent thinking about the Gospel of Mark has emphasized its nature as an oral performance (more on this idea <a href=\"http:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/2014\/08\/performing-mark\/\">here<\/a>). So imagine that you are listening to the Gospel of Mark. The speaker has been at it for an hour and half and is now nearing the end. It was devastating when the twelve fled from Jesus, it was worse when Peter outright denied Jesus, and there was no one left to carry the &#8220;good news&#8221; to the world when Jesus died. But then&#8211;the women return! The young man tells them not to be afraid because Jesus has risen. This is great! Now surely they&#8217;ll tell everyone! But then, abruptly, they run away silent and fearing. There is no one left . . . except for you. Performance analysis of Mark has shown how the audience of the gospel has been involved and empowered to be disciples. And now the ball is in our court. There is no one else to share the good news with the world&#8211;no one but us. We can&#8217;t pass the sign-up sheet along with the thought that surely someone else will fill in the blank, because we are the last person on the row, filling the last seat in the class. We do it, or it doesn&#8217;t get done.<\/p>\n<p>This ending is so much more powerful than a resurrection appearance: it creates a sense of urgency in the audience to\u00a0proclaim the good news that Jesus Christ has risen.<\/p>\n<p><em>Note: this will be the last lesson note in this series\u00a0since my plan was to cover only the gospels. Thanks for reading!<\/em><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So here\u2019s the plan: each week that the gospels are covered in Sunday School, I will post\u00a0one question from my book along with a brief discussion of the issues that it raises. Most ancient manuscripts of Mark end after 16:8 and early Christians do not seem to know any of this chapter after verse 8. The style, vocabulary, and themes in Mark 16:9\u201320 are quite different from the rest of Mark. Therefore, the vast majority of scholars believe that the Gospel of Mark originally ended with verse 8 and that verses 9\u201320 are a later addition by another author. It is also possible that the original ending (any material after verse 8) was somehow lost. Suppose for a moment that, as most scholars believe, the Gospel did originally end after verse 8. Why did Mark write such an abrupt ending? What effect does it have on you as a reader?\u00a0 (adapted from Search, Ponder, and Pray: A Guide to the Gospels)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[55],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33456","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news-politics"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33456","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33456"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33456\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33506,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33456\/revisions\/33506"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33456"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33456"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33456"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}