{"id":3323,"date":"2006-07-25T14:07:48","date_gmt":"2006-07-25T18:07:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/?p=3323"},"modified":"2006-07-25T14:09:58","modified_gmt":"2006-07-25T18:09:58","slug":"wishing-well-penny","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/2006\/07\/wishing-well-penny\/","title":{"rendered":"Wishing Well, Penny"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A dear friend of mine recently wrote to me, confiding that she&#8217;s been coming to the slow and vertiginous realization that she&#8217;s never had a strong testimony of the gospel, despite a life of exemplary activity in and service to the Church.  With her permission, I&#8217;ve shared my response to her letter below. <!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Dearest, <\/p>\n<p>I want you to know first of all that I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t think that your doubt is the fruit of sin. You are a sinner, certainly, we all are; some of us sinners, inexplicably, retain our faith, and some of us don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t. There are sinful ways of managing doubt, like handling it ungently with intimates, or using it as justification for sloth or dishonesty or cruelty, or finding in it evidence of one\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s own superiority, spiritual or intellectual. I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t think you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ll make these mistakes, though, and writing to me was a good way to come to an initial settlement. I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m not horrified or hurt, and it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s always okay to talk to me about where you are. <\/p>\n<p>I think I know a little of what you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re facing. Like you, I easily fall under the influence of elegant naturalisms, and like you, I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m frequently persuaded by rational analyses of religious and spiritual phenomena.  One of things I want to convey to you is that I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve been able to live well for some time through periodic encounters with doubt. I may be unusual in this way. But if urgent spiritual effort doesn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t yield results, consider the possibility that you can stay where you are spiritually for a while, and give it time, a long time. These are the biggest questions, and they deserve maturity and experience on their side. <\/p>\n<p>I generally don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t find accounts of other people\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s spiritual experiences persuasive&#8212;I often find them embarrassing, in fact&#8212;so I won\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t give you the specifics of mine. But I have had from time to time what I think of as \u00e2\u20ac\u0153irreducible\u00e2\u20ac? spiritual intuitions that I think I can distinguish from high emotion and desire, coming as they have without the promptings of high-key sociality or emotion. These experiences are sufficient to sustain my faith in God and the Restoration, the former being for me the more fragile than the latter. I do believe that surer witnesses are available to me and others, though they seem to come infrequently, and I live with the hope and expectation of another, surer revelation. <\/p>\n<p>Your faith is failing, you say, because the feelings you once interpreted as spiritual witnesses have decamped, and look in hindsight more like wishful delusion than personal revelation. I certainly recognize this variety of doubt: as I said above, the spiritual intuitions I rely on most are, circuitously, the ones that don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t come at moments of high social or emotional pitch, precisely because (I judge that) I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m therefore less likely to mistake wishes or delusions for revelation. <\/p>\n<p>But more and more I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m wondering if this subtractive method is wrong, if after all I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m wrong to strip away the layers of desire and story and emotion and memory in search of the hard bright penny of positive knowledge. Could it be instead that desire and story and all the rest aren\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t, as I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve thought, counterfeit revelation, but are in fact the elemental substances of  revelation, and that in personal revelation God invites us to make meaning with him?  To be a conscious human is to transform sensory information into, precisely, desire and story and memory and feeling; presumably it is this capacity for consciousness that sets apart humanity as the family of God, that is, in fact, the image of the divine in us. To receive personal revelation, then, might not be so much a problem of tuning out the static of self and tuning in the celestial frequency, but rather of heightening the processes of consciousness, of mingling our own faculties with God\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s to make meaning out of sensations and information unorganized. Which is to say, maybe it is wishful thinking, and maybe that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s exactly how it ought to be.<\/p>\n<p>When you see a family posed in prayer, the deacons at the solemn choreography of the sacrament, supplicants and congregants giving body to the rituals and mind to the myths&#8212;how could such unnatural beauty draw its substance from anything else but desire and story and feeling and memory?  A million hard bright pennies, for all their value, couldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t begin to do the trick.<\/p>\n<p>I love you, and you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ll get through this.<\/p>\n<p>Rosalynde<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A dear friend of mine recently wrote to me, confiding that she&#8217;s been coming to the slow and vertiginous realization that she&#8217;s never had a strong testimony of the gospel, despite a life of exemplary activity in and service to the Church. With her permission, I&#8217;ve shared my response to her letter below.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":42,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3323","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-corn"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3323","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/42"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3323"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3323\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3323"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3323"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3323"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}