{"id":32355,"date":"2014-12-13T14:04:05","date_gmt":"2014-12-13T19:04:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/?p=32355"},"modified":"2014-12-13T15:10:59","modified_gmt":"2014-12-13T20:10:59","slug":"taking-control-of-your-gospel-doctrine-class-because-youre-the-teacher","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/2014\/12\/taking-control-of-your-gospel-doctrine-class-because-youre-the-teacher\/","title":{"rendered":"Taking Control of Your Gospel Doctrine Class&#8230; Because You&#8217;re the Teacher"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve wondered how much blame for\u00a0\u00a0&#8220;uninformative&#8221; (Pres. Kimball&#8217;s description) or &#8220;uninspiring&#8221; (Elder Holland&#8217;s paraphrase) teaching in Gospel Doctrine comes from collective failure. Yes, a good teacher can do wonders, but if many classes don&#8217;t really talk about the scriptures in question, it&#8217;s because virtually no one but the teacher has read them. <!--more-->If the teacher feels compelled to be merely a &#8220;discussion leader&#8221; instead of, you know, the Gospel Doctrine TEACHER, and\u00a0no one is actually prepared to discuss Ezekiel or Daniel, then the class discussion is going to wander to other things, like food storage, random evils of The World\u2122 \u00a0or stories from the\u00a0mission, that relate only in the vaguest of ways to the two verses of Daniel we read out loud. Even worse is when we conclude afterwards\u00a0that the passage in question\u00a0<em>really<\/em>\u00a0was speaking prophetically about whatever random topic we&#8217;ve hit on (see <a href=\"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithpromotingrumor\/2007\/07\/missing-the-forest\/\">my old post here<\/a>.) Getting people to read is its own bucket of issues, and I&#8217;d be interested in suggestions on that.<\/p>\n<p>But I, at least, as teacher, don&#8217;t feel compelled to turn over the discussion to people who aren&#8217;t prepared to contribute to it in a substantial way. I know\u00a0Gospel Doctrine is not and shouldn&#8217;t be grad school, and I don&#8217;t expect it to be, but if I were a professor and all my students came to a seminar not having done any work at all to prepare, I&#8217;d be beyond angry. As is, I&#8217;m merely frustrated and sad at the missed opportunities for good inspiring edification through collective sharing of knowledge, and the people we lose through boredom and lack of interest.<\/p>\n<p>I did not consider my teaching philosophy unusual until I had this recent conversation with someone teaching Daniel 2 this week, in response to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/benjaminthescribe\/2014\/12\/gospel-doctrine-lesson-46-daniel-2\/\">my post<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>(Slightly edited)<\/p>\n<p>Q- Do you think it&#8217;d be fruitful to discuss Mormon millennialism and its decline and our assimilation in American culture? I can just imagine a lot of pushback. (Ben says, I talked about millennialism in my post.)<\/p>\n<p><em>Ben-\u00a0<\/em>\u00a0Maybe a 20 second aside, on something like <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lds.org\/scriptures\/dc-testament\/dc\/130?lang=eng#14\">D&amp;C 130:14-17<\/a> as an example. (Wherein Joseph prays very earnestly to know just how soon the Second \u00a0Coming will be).<\/p>\n<p>Q-\u00a0It just seems like it might get weird if I go there.<\/p>\n<p><em>Ben<\/em>-I just don&#8217;t give people opportunity to talk until I get through my entire spiel, which provides necessary context and steers things in the right direction.<\/p>\n<p>Q-Lol. I like your style.\u00a0But then my wife says, &#8220;You need to ask more questions.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><em>Ben<\/em>&#8211; I prefaced last week with &#8220;I think discussions <em>about<\/em> scripture\u00a0work best when everyone has recently read the scriptures in question. Most of the time though, that doesn&#8217;t happen. So I&#8217;ve prepared a mix of 80% lecture and 20% discussion&#8230; unless my assumption about no one reading is wrong. So how many people read Ezekiel 43,44,47 by a show of hands? Huh, well, while I wish we had disproved my assumption, I&#8217;m prepared to do most of the talking. Read for next week.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Q-That&#8217;s probably the most amazing thing I&#8217;ve ever heard a GD teacher say to the class.<br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ajax\/mercury\/attachments\/photo.php?fbid=10205454826389619&amp;mode=contain&amp;width=176&amp;height=176\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>My interlocutor&#8217;s response surprised me. I&#8217;m as appreciative of validation\/\u00a0flattery as anyone (maybe more, given my professional failures), but doesn&#8217;t everybody do this? \u00a0If not, why not? I can think of some reasons, perhaps, but I&#8217;m interested in other thoughts.<\/p>\n<p>How do we get Gospel Doctrine classes to read? How should we teach when they haven&#8217;t read?<\/p>\n<p>(If you are not the teacher, however, and the teacher is doing a &#8220;less effective&#8221; job, see <a href=\"http:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/2011\/12\/teaching-from-the-pew-when-the-manual-authorizes-subverting-the-teacher\/\">my post here for how <em>Teaching: No Greater Call<\/em> authorizes you to help<\/a>.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve wondered how much blame for\u00a0\u00a0&#8220;uninformative&#8221; (Pres. Kimball&#8217;s description) or &#8220;uninspiring&#8221; (Elder Holland&#8217;s paraphrase) teaching in Gospel Doctrine comes from collective failure. Yes, a good teacher can do wonders, but if many classes don&#8217;t really talk about the scriptures in question, it&#8217;s because virtually no one but the teacher has read them.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":23,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[55],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32355","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news-politics"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32355","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/23"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32355"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32355\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32364,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32355\/revisions\/32364"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32355"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32355"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32355"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}