{"id":25471,"date":"2013-03-20T18:13:56","date_gmt":"2013-03-20T23:13:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/?p=25471"},"modified":"2013-03-20T18:26:02","modified_gmt":"2013-03-20T23:26:02","slug":"im-a-mormon-and-i-believe-that-women","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/2013\/03\/im-a-mormon-and-i-believe-that-women\/","title":{"rendered":"I\u2019m a Mormon, and I believe that women"},"content":{"rendered":"

. . . should be eligible for Priesthood ordination<\/a>.<\/p>\n

So do these other lovely people<\/a>. Please check out some of the profiles, if it’s a topic that interests you, or visit our facebook page<\/a> for more discussion. <\/p>\n

I know it’s not everyone’s cup of tea, and I know that reasonable people can disagree here. But I do think that one can very much believe in female ordination within the Mormon framework. It fits well into the narrative of ever-expanding Priesthood eligibility in LDS theology, I think (ever-expanding circles from Levites to Israelites to Gentiles, and finally to all men in 1978). It also fits well into many LDS ideas on gender — if men and women are fundamentally different as church leaders suggest, then men may not be able to adequately represent women’s interests. It meshes well with statements from LDS history, such as Joseph Smith’s prophecy that the Relief Society would be a “kingdom of priests.”<\/a> It engages President Hinckley’s public suggestion that members interested in ordination should agitate<\/a> a little<\/a>. Heck, it even dovetails nicely with a Harvard study<\/a> or two<\/a>. <\/p>\n

But most importantly of all, it matters a lot to many LDS women about whom I care deeply<\/a>. The relative invisibility of women in so many spheres causes great pain to many of our sisters. And I mourn with those who mourn; and it is for them that I look forward to the long-awaited day when every faithful, worthy person<\/em> in the Church may receive the holy priesthood, with power to exercise its divine authority, and enjoy with their loved ones every blessing that flows therefrom.<\/p>\n

Some day, I believe, the church’s ecclesiastical structure will more fully reflect the scriptural injunction that all are alike unto God<\/a>. And that will be a fantastic step forward for the community, and a cause to rejoice.<\/p>\n

Hi, I’m Kaimi. I’m a Mormon. And I believe that women should be eligible for Priesthood ordination<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

. . . should be eligible for Priesthood ordination. So do these other lovely people. Please check out some of the profiles, if it’s a topic that interests you, or visit our facebook page for more discussion. I know it’s not everyone’s cup of tea, and I know that reasonable people can disagree here. But I do think that one can very much believe in female ordination within the Mormon framework. It fits well into the narrative of ever-expanding Priesthood eligibility in LDS theology, I think (ever-expanding circles from Levites to Israelites to Gentiles, and finally to all men in 1978). It also fits well into many LDS ideas on gender — if men and women are fundamentally different as church leaders suggest, then men may not be able to adequately represent women’s interests. It meshes well with statements from LDS history, such as Joseph Smith’s prophecy that the Relief Society would be a “kingdom of priests.” It engages President Hinckley’s public suggestion that members interested in ordination should agitate a little. Heck, it even dovetails nicely with a Harvard study or two. But most importantly of all, it matters a lot to many LDS women about whom I care […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25471","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-women-in-the-church"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25471","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25471"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25471\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25484,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25471\/revisions\/25484"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25471"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25471"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25471"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}