{"id":2163,"date":"2005-04-13T10:55:45","date_gmt":"2005-04-13T15:55:45","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=2163"},"modified":"2005-04-12T15:57:07","modified_gmt":"2005-04-12T20:57:07","slug":"blogging-and-man-dates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/2005\/04\/blogging-and-man-dates\/","title":{"rendered":"Bloggernacking and Man-dates"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There&#8217;s been quite a bit of buzz in the blogosphere at large about <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/04\/10\/fashion\/10date.html?ex=1270785600&#038;en=37bef79604f97228&#038;ei=5090&#038;partner=rssuserland\">Jennifer 8. Lee&#8217;s New York Times piece on &#8220;man-dates.&#8221;<\/a>  Lee suggests that it is socially perilous for two heterosexual men to meet for dinner, without sports, business, or a bar to defuse the date-like-ness of the meeting.  I don&#8217;t know how valid Lee&#8217;s thesis is in the broader spectrum (and there is some doubt being expressed on <a href=\"http:\/\/crookedtimber.org\/2005\/04\/12\/the-man-date\/\">other<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/prawfsblawg.blogs.com\/prawfsblawg\/2005\/04\/a_mandate_for_m.html\">blogs<\/a>).  But even if Lee is right, I think that the phenomenon may be one to which bloggernackers are immune.  Or at least, to which I&#8217;m immune.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>After all, the last time I can think of when I went out to dinner with a guy was . . . oh, a few months ago, when Nate was in town.  We had Brazilian food, and we talked about law and blogging and law some more.  It was a fun conversation, and I have to say that I found it completely devoid of Jennifer Lee&#8217;s bugbears &#8212; &#8220;undercurrent of homoeroticism&#8221; or the &#8220;discomfort in socializing&#8221; between heterosexual men.  <\/p>\n<p>For a while it looked like I was going to have dinner with Gordon in Washington several months ago.  As it was, extra guests showed up, and we had a fun conversation with the whole group.  But for a while it was just Gordon and I, and again I don&#8217;t recall feeling any discomfort.  <\/p>\n<p>Maybe it&#8217;s that Nate and Gordon and I are law geeks and therefore conversant in the language of law geekiness.  Maybe it&#8217;s that my own personal gay-dar is sufficiently defunct that I probably wouldn&#8217;t know a homoerotic undercurrent if it hit me over the head.  (I&#8217;m always surprised when an acquaintance says he&#8217;s gay, since I have no ability at all to detect homosexuality in others).  Maybe it&#8217;s that church members are used to talking to each other &#8212; we do it with home teaching companions, quorum members, and so on.  I&#8217;m not quite sure why, but the &#8220;man-date&#8221; idea just doesn&#8217;t reflect my personal experiences at all.<\/p>\n<p>Is this &#8220;man-date&#8221; discomfort just something that Lee made up for her story?  Is it something which I&#8217;m immune to, as a generally socially clueless individual?  Or is it that the bloggernacle gives me immunity?  I wonder.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There&#8217;s been quite a bit of buzz in the blogosphere at large about Jennifer 8. Lee&#8217;s New York Times piece on &#8220;man-dates.&#8221; Lee suggests that it is socially perilous for two heterosexual men to meet for dinner, without sports, business, or a bar to defuse the date-like-ness of the meeting. I don&#8217;t know how valid Lee&#8217;s thesis is in the broader spectrum (and there is some doubt being expressed on other blogs). But even if Lee is right, I think that the phenomenon may be one to which bloggernackers are immune. Or at least, to which I&#8217;m immune.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2163","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-corn"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2163","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2163"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2163\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2163"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2163"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2163"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}