{"id":16952,"date":"2011-09-06T17:02:24","date_gmt":"2011-09-06T22:02:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/?p=16952"},"modified":"2011-09-06T17:02:24","modified_gmt":"2011-09-06T22:02:24","slug":"books-of-interest-to-the-lds-nerd","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/2011\/09\/books-of-interest-to-the-lds-nerd\/","title":{"rendered":"Books of Interest to the LDS Nerd"},"content":{"rendered":"

A few of these are forthcoming, a few have appeared recently. I am compelled to read them all, as soon as I can get to them.<\/p>\n

Now Available<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"Charles Harrel,“This Is My Doctrine”: The Development of Mormon Theology <\/em>(Kofford Books<\/a>) “In this first-of-its-kind comprehensive treatment of the development of Mormon theology, Charles Harrell traces the history of Latter-day Saint doctrines from the times of the Old Testament to the present.” I have my doubts that someone who does not equally control original Biblical sources and LDS history, as well as the vast amounts of secondary literature on historiography, exegesis, etc. can give LDS doctrine a truly comprehensive diachronic treatment, and compress it into 597 pages. Nevertheless, I’m grateful to Harrel, an engineering professor, for making the attempt and I look forward to reading it. Too many LDS labor under the assumption that the status quo<\/em> sprang fully formed from Joseph Smith. I don’t recall which of my friends said, but it’s in my Evernote file<\/a>, “If there’s one thing Mormons excel at, it’s enshrining the status quo and assuming that if we do anything, there must be a good reason for it, and if there’s a good reason, it must have been revealed as the only way to do it, and if so, then it must have always been that way in all dispensations. And a lot of people’s faith can be shaken when it turns out not to always have been that way, which unravels that chain of reasoning back from that point until you doubt the premise, i.e., that any of it was revealed at all.”<\/p>\n

\"\"Brant Gardner, The Gift and Power: Translating the Book of Mormon<\/em> (Kofford Books<\/a>) Many questions about the Book of Mormon end up centering on the nature of the translation, and many papers make tacit assumptions about it. Brant’s is the deepest treatment addressing those assumptions.His FAIR Conference presentation<\/a> this year appears to have been based on his book. Gift and Power<\/em> has already been reviewed elsewhere<\/a>, so I’ll pass by without further commentary except to say that Brant’s previous volumes on the Book of Mormon<\/a> have been fresh and thoughtful, and I expect no less from this.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\"\"Harold Bloom, The Shadow of a Great Rock: A Literary Appreciation of the King James Bible<\/em> (Yale University Press<\/a>) This is one of a string of books to appear about the KJV this year, but Bloom and the literary approach mark this one apart. Preview available<\/a>. I’m particularly interested because the literary argument comes up repeatedly in LDS contexts. Of historical note, though, is that the KJV was not meant to be literary, and no one thought it was so until at least a century had passed. Chapter 1, “Language within language: the King James Steamroller” of Hamlin, The King James Bible After Four Hundred Years: Literary, Linguistic, and Cultural Influences<\/em> (Cambridge) appears to address this. (I only had a few minutes to browse it.) Another recent volumes of note is The King James Bible: A Short History from Tyndale to Today<\/em> by David Norton, the author of the authoritative, technical and expensive<\/a> Textual History of the King James Bible. <\/em><\/p>\n

Coming in September<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"John Walton’s Genesis 1 as Ancient Cosmology<\/em> (Eisenbrauns<\/a>) This is the expanded version of Walton’s arguments found in The Lost World of Genesis 1<\/em> (Eerdmans), but Lost World<\/em> was for a lay audience and Ancient Cosmology<\/em> a more academic audience. Walton places Genesis 1 in its ancient Near Eastern context and argues convincingly that Israelites read it as a description of functional, not material creation, and furthermore, Genesis 1 is a temple text. You can get the gist of his thesis from the audio here<\/a>. Jared at LDS Science Review has addressed Walton several times (here<\/a> and here<\/a>), and the comments include an enthusiastic endorsement<\/a> by SteveP, BYU biologist and BCC blogger.<\/p>\n

Coming in October<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\" N.T. Wright, The Kingdom New Testament: A Contemporary Translation (<\/em>Harper One) N.T. Wright is a prolific paradigm-shattering New Testament scholar, who is nevertheless very accessible to laypeople. Among others, he’s authored commentaries on Romans and a New Testament commentary series<\/a> “For Everyone” as well as books on Paul, and Heaven. He’s criticized various Bible translations in the past, so I’m glad to hear he’ll have his own. Ben Witherington interviews him about it here.<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Jewish Annotated New Testament<\/em> (Oxford Press<\/a>) I’m familiar with both of the editors, Marc Brettler from his How to Read the Bible<\/em> <\/a> (not to be confused with books of the same title from James Kugel or Steven McKenzie) and Amy-Jill Levine from her lectures with the Teaching Company<\/a>. Oxford’s Jewish Study Bible<\/em> has an excellent set of notes, essays and other aids. The Jewish Annotated New Testament<\/em> aims to do the same thing for the New Testament, from a Jewish Perspective. “For non-Jewish readers interested in the Jewish roots of Christianity and for Jewish readers who want a New Testament that neither proselytizes for Christianity nor denigrates Judaism, The Jewish Annotated New Testament<\/span><\/em> is an essential volume that places these writings in a context that will enlighten students, professionals, and general readers.” Among other notable features, the JANT<\/em>, is the “first New Testament annotated by Jewish scholars (barring those who have converted to Christianity), brings out Jewish background of early Christianity, New Testament writers, explains Jewish concepts (e.g., food laws, rabbinic argumentation) for non-Jews & Christian concepts (e.g., Eucharist) for Jews, and will be helpful for non-Jewish readers interested in the Jewish roots of Christianity.”<\/p>\n

Coming in January<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\" Peter Enns, The Evolution of Adam: What the Bible does and Doesn’t Say about Human Origins <\/em>(Brazos Press)<\/p>\n

Enns says<\/a>, “The book is divided into two parts. Part one focuses on Genesis, and my general point is that the creation stories are part of Israel\u2019s literature of national and religious self-definition. In other words, they are not prepared to give the type of (historical and scientific) information we ask for today when speaking of \u201chuman origins.\u201d To seek such information is to misread Genesis, and so attempts to align science and Genesis get us off on the foot altogether by not taking the biblical text on its own terms.Part two focuses on Paul\u2019s use of the Adam story in Romans 5. Paul\u2019s reading of the Adam story, despite superficial appearances, is hardly straightforward, and appreciating the theological subtly and depth of Paul\u2019s words requires much more of us than simply opening an English Bible, reading a few verses, and drawing conclusions. I go on and on about this for a lot of pages, because this is a far more pressing problem for most Christian readers than Genesis.<\/p>\n

The audience for the commentary is seminarians, pastors, and scholars. For The Evolution of Adam,<\/em> the intended audience is similar to that of Inspiration and Incarnation<\/em>: lay readers looking for different approaches to old problems. In fact, The Evolution of Adam <\/em>applies the approach of Inspiration and Incarnation<\/em> to a specific and pressing issue: in view of evolution, what does it mean to read the Bible well? So think of EOA<\/em> as I&I<\/em> part two.” I was a big fan of I&I, as well as the lectures of his I’ve heard online and in person<\/a>. (Some posts of mine about Enns’ ideas here<\/a> and here<\/a>)<\/p>\n

Happy reading.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A few of these are forthcoming, a few have appeared recently. I am compelled to read them all, as soon as I can get to them. Now Available Charles Harrel,“This Is My Doctrine”: The Development of Mormon Theology (Kofford Books) “In this first-of-its-kind comprehensive treatment of the development of Mormon theology, Charles Harrell traces the history of Latter-day Saint doctrines from the times of the Old Testament to the present.” I have my doubts that someone who does not equally control original Biblical sources and LDS history, as well as the vast amounts of secondary literature on historiography, exegesis, etc. can give LDS doctrine a truly comprehensive diachronic treatment, and compress it into 597 pages. Nevertheless, I’m grateful to Harrel, an engineering professor, for making the attempt and I look forward to reading it. Too many LDS labor under the assumption that the status quo sprang fully formed from Joseph Smith. I don’t recall which of my friends said, but it’s in my Evernote file, “If there’s one thing Mormons excel at, it’s enshrining the status quo and assuming that if we do anything, there must be a good reason for it, and if there’s a good reason, it must […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":23,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[17,1,18,1163,53,51,54,1312,35,24,55,14,39],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16952","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-church-history","category-corn","category-general-doctrine","category-latter-day-saint-publications","category-latter-day-saint-thought","category-lessons-all","category-mormon-life","category-mormon-review","category-mormon-studies","category-music-and-poetry","category-news-politics","category-parenting","category-sports"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16952","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/23"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16952"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16952\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16961,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16952\/revisions\/16961"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16952"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16952"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16952"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}