{"id":15940,"date":"2011-06-14T20:13:40","date_gmt":"2011-06-15T01:13:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/?p=15940"},"modified":"2011-06-25T12:37:13","modified_gmt":"2011-06-25T17:37:13","slug":"stop-telling-the-yw-to-be-modest-for-the-ym","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/2011\/06\/stop-telling-the-yw-to-be-modest-for-the-ym\/","title":{"rendered":"Stop Telling the YW to Be Modest for the YM"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The emphasis here is on <em>for the YM<\/em>, not <em>to be modest<\/em>.  In fact, most of you would consider me to be ultra-conservative in the modesty department:<!--more--> when I had toddler boys, I would not take them out of the house in clothing that didn&#8217;t reach the knees and cover the shoulders.  So I&#8217;m plenty uptight about dressing modestly, I promise.  <\/p>\n<p>There are all sorts of good reasons for the YW to be modest.  But being modest for the sake of the YM is not one of them.<\/p>\n<p>(1) I don&#8217;t know what things are like in the Jell-O belt, but out here in the mission field, the average YM sees plenty of immodest clothing:  at school, at the mall (Do kids still go to the mall?  I have no idea.  I&#8217;m 36.), at the library, in the express lane at HEB.  I&#8217;m pretty sure I&#8217;m the only person in this entire zip code with sleeves on at this moment; the high is 100 or 101 every blessed day this week.  He may even go to a ward swim activity where our faithful YW wear (modest) bathing suits.  I can&#8217;t understand why this parade of flesh wouldn&#8217;t tempt him, but a YW wearing a shorts five inches above the knee would.  If he&#8217;s able to survive the daily it&#8217;s-way-too-hot-for-fabric parade, it isn&#8217;t our YW (who, on average, he rarely sees anyway) who are going to push him over the edge.  To suggest that our modestly-dressed YW are the only thing between our YM and wild abandon is . . . bizarre. <\/p>\n<p>(2) I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve heard counsel to the YM along the lines of &#8220;Don&#8217;t just marry a girl because she&#8217;s pretty&#8211;you may be stuck with a shallow, or faithless, or humorless hag for all eternity&#8221; (of course, they phrase it a little more nicely).  But you never hear this:  &#8220;Don&#8217;t just date the pretty girls, because you&#8217;ll cause girls to obsess about their looks and possibly sin as they try to win the beauty arms race.&#8221;  In other words, we always couch the counsel in terms of the costs and benefits to the boy himself&#8211;not to the girls affected by his decisions.  We should do the same with the YW.  Each YM or YW should be the star of their own story&#8211;not the subject of someone else&#8217;s.  <\/p>\n<p>(3) If all girls hear is &#8220;Be modest so you don&#8217;t tempt the YM,&#8221; they might think, &#8220;I have zero risk of tempting anyone anyway because I look like Jabba the Hut&#8211;even if I wore a bikini . . . especially in a bikini!&#8221;  The fact is, I&#8217;m sorry to say, that there are some YW out there who aren&#8217;t going to turn heads no matter what they are (not) wearing.  They know it.  But they still need to be modest.  I have to wonder if what I consider to be rampant immodesty on the part of some middle-aged LDS women is tied to the fact that they think that because they aren&#8217;t likely to tempt anyone anymore, they can (not) wear whatever they want now.  Linking modesty solely to its effects on other people ignores a much broader underpinning of respect for our own bodies, regardless of how others perceive those bodies in terms of sexual attractiveness.<\/p>\n<p>(4) We believe that YM will be punished for their own sins.  It is a terrible theology that suggests that a YW could cause another person to sin.  None of us wants to see that thinking come to fruition with a YM thinking that he &#8216;had no choice&#8217; but to sexually assault a YW because she tempted him beyond what he could stand by dressing immodestly.  I&#8217;m absolutely sure that no adult who has told YW to be modest for the sake of YM would be anything but horrified by that kind of thinking, but it isn&#8217;t too far of a leap for an immature, hormone-addled brain to make.  <\/p>\n<p>(5) Kathryn Soper has explained <a href=\"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/Resources\/Additional-Resources\/Standards-Night-Is-Substandard-Teaching-Sexuality-to-the-Young-Women?offset=0&#038;max=1\">this<\/a> far more eloquently than I will be able to, but can we stop reminding the girls of how much sexual power they hold?  Their immature, hormone-addled brains hear &#8220;If I dress immodestly, I&#8217;ll have power over boys!&#8221;  Combine that with their lack of institutional power and recognition (&#8220;We&#8217;d like to thank the Aaronic Priesthood for the reverent way in which they . . .&#8221;) and the extreme emphasis that we place on their marriages (and the demographic imbalance that makes those unlikely for some of them) and it&#8217;s no wonder we have problems with modesty.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;d like to see us develop a narrative of female modesty tied to their power and individual worth, not to their impact on other people.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The emphasis here is on for the YM, not to be modest. In fact, most of you would consider me to be ultra-conservative in the modesty department:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15940","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-corn"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15940","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15940"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15940\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16057,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15940\/revisions\/16057"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15940"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15940"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15940"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}