{"id":1424,"date":"2004-10-06T11:26:06","date_gmt":"2004-10-06T15:26:06","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=1424"},"modified":"2009-01-20T12:44:46","modified_gmt":"2009-01-20T16:44:46","slug":"more-on-authority-etc-at-nine-moons","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/2004\/10\/more-on-authority-etc-at-nine-moons\/","title":{"rendered":"(When) are bloggers permitted to criticize church leaders?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This topic has come up in recent posts around the bloggernacle.  For example, Rusty at Nine Moons <a href=\"http:\/\/nine-moons.blogspot.com\/2004\/10\/just-because-its-commitment-doesnt.html\">discusses an instance where<\/a> a bishop committed all of the men in the ward to &#8220;1) To never watch an R-rated movie ever again. Also, to never watch a PG-13 rated movie without his wife\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s permission. 2) To use the internet (at home presumably) only with his wife\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s permission (by assigning a password on the computer that only the wife knows).&#8221;  The <a href=\"http:\/\/nine-moons.blogspot.com\/2004\/10\/just-because-its-commitment-doesnt.html\">comments to Rusty&#8217;s post <\/a>include a number of attacks on him for posting criticism of the Bishop.  (e.g., &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.haloscan.com\/comments\/rustyclifton\/109694931416820292#27780\">did you pray [before posting this critique] . . . I can say with absolute certainty that you could not have<\/a>&#8220;).  Meanwhile, Steve at BCC <a href=\"http:\/\/rameumptom.blogspot.com\/2004\/10\/speaking-evil-of-lords-anointed-and.html\">wonders whether he is allowed to criticize conference talks for style<\/a>.  (The BCC commenters, perhaps inured to Steve&#8217;s views, haven&#8217;t yet asked him if he prayed before posting them, but I suppose it&#8217;s just a matter of time).  <\/p>\n<p>So let&#8217;s see what people around here think.  Is it permissible for a blogger to comment on (perhaps critically) statements by a church leader?  Is it permissible in some situations and not others?  (When?)  And, of course, why or why not?  [Note &#8212; this topic is open to several different interpretations; please keep our <a href=\"misc.php#policies\">commenting policies <\/a>in mind.  Thank you.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This topic has come up in recent posts around the bloggernacle. For example, Rusty at Nine Moons discusses an instance where a bishop committed all of the men in the ward to &#8220;1) To never watch an R-rated movie ever again. Also, to never watch a PG-13 rated movie without his wife\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s permission. 2) To use the internet (at home presumably) only with his wife\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s permission (by assigning a password on the computer that only the wife knows).&#8221; The comments to Rusty&#8217;s post include a number of attacks on him for posting criticism of the Bishop. (e.g., &#8220;did you pray [before posting this critique] . . . I can say with absolute certainty that you could not have&#8220;). Meanwhile, Steve at BCC wonders whether he is allowed to criticize conference talks for style. (The BCC commenters, perhaps inured to Steve&#8217;s views, haven&#8217;t yet asked him if he prayed before posting them, but I suppose it&#8217;s just a matter of time). So let&#8217;s see what people around here think. Is it permissible for a blogger to comment on (perhaps critically) statements by a church leader? Is it permissible in some situations and not others? (When?) And, of course, why or why [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,18,54],"tags":[16],"class_list":["post-1424","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-corn","category-general-doctrine","category-mormon-life","tag-church-organization-and-structure"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1424","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1424"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1424\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6556,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1424\/revisions\/6556"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1424"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1424"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1424"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}