{"id":13701,"date":"2010-11-05T10:27:07","date_gmt":"2010-11-05T15:27:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/?p=13701"},"modified":"2010-11-09T11:07:08","modified_gmt":"2010-11-09T16:07:08","slug":"mormon-identity-men-and-women-in-the-church","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/2010\/11\/mormon-identity-men-and-women-in-the-church\/","title":{"rendered":"Mormon Identity:  Men and Women in the Church"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Go <a href=\"http:\/\/radio.lds.org\/eng\/programs\/mormon-identity-episode-6\">here<\/a> and either listen to or read (I love transcripts!  Thank you!) this episode and then return and report.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>As for me and my house:<\/p>\n<p>(1) The beginning of the conversation with the &#8220;motherhood is more than giving birth&#8221; and &#8220;women aren&#8217;t missing anything&#8221; themes left me cold.  I wish I could have had them flesh these ideas out . . . I would have asked, &#8220;Why are we calling it &#8216;motherhood&#8217; if we aren&#8217;t talking about &#8216;motherhood&#8217; as the term is universally used?  Wouldn&#8217;t it be better to use a different term?&#8221;  And I&#8217;m not sure what the goal is of the &#8220;women aren&#8217;t missing out on anything&#8221; theme.  If that is how some women feel, I don&#8217;t see how telling them &#8220;no, you aren&#8217;t&#8221; would be helpful.  It seems to me that what would be appropriate would be a follow-up question such as &#8220;what do you feel that you are missing out on?&#8221; and then a response to the answer to that question. <\/p>\n<p>(2) I appreciated and fully agreed with the discussion of &#8220;Christian virtues&#8221; and thought Fronk Olsen and Millet were rather daring to phrase things the way that they did, given that we could find a veritable boatload of authoritative quotations from important people claiming that those virtues are gender-based.  <\/p>\n<p>(3) On the patriarchy discussion (bottom of page 4):  I think most any person would find at least a paradox if not an outright conflict between the idea of &#8220;equal partnership&#8221; and &#8220;husband&#8217;s leadership,&#8221; and so I find it disappointing that Fronk Olsen didn&#8217;t explore that paradox\/conflict (and said that it seemed &#8220;simple&#8221; to her).  There might be a solution here at the top of page 6, where she refers to Elder Oaks teaching that &#8220;patriarchal&#8221; priesthood means something <em>not<\/em> hierarchical but equal.  Which bring us back to my issue with using words differently than everyone else does . . . <\/p>\n<p>(4)  &#8220;Church broken.&#8221;  Ha.  Never heard that one before.  Going to use that. <\/p>\n<p>(5) It does make one wonder in what ways our youth might think differently about gender if they spent their zoned-out sacrament meetings staring at a picture of a woman looming over Jesus instead of a blank wall.<\/p>\n<p>(6) I think &#8220;Mormon Identity&#8221; is a bizarre title.  The first and only thing it made me think of was <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Christian_Identity\">Christian Identity<\/a>&#8211;not good, not good.  I heard that the title is being changed to &#8220;Mormon Identities&#8221; (which I suppose is better but inasmuch as it feeds into the whole new mormon.org look-how-urban-and-hip-and-diverse-we-are scene, I&#8217;m not too thrilled with that either, as you perhaps had already <a href=\"http:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/2010\/05\/mormon-site-muzzles-members\/\">guessed<\/a>).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Go here and either listen to or read (I love transcripts! Thank you!) this episode and then return and report.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13701","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-corn"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13701","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13701"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13701\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13717,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13701\/revisions\/13717"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13701"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13701"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13701"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}