{"id":1001,"date":"2004-06-29T21:53:23","date_gmt":"2004-06-30T03:53:23","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=1001"},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"-0001-11-30T06:00:00","slug":"this-is-only-a-test","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/2004\/06\/this-is-only-a-test\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;This is only a test. . ."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>. . . if it were an actual commandment, this message would be followed by a theologically sound explanation . . .&#8221;<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nNo, seriously.  In one of the many beard discussions, I suggested that perhaps this little bit of Mormondom is simply a test of obedience.  Ralph replied:<\/p>\n<p><i>Julie,<\/p>\n<p>In all honesty, I guess to get to the heart of the matter, I see people who are ready to jump on the &#8220;test of obedience&#8221; bandwagon as a bit lazy. <\/p>\n<p>That is NOT intended to be an insult like it sounds.<\/p>\n<p>I just do not believe God or his true chosen leaders need to create anything trivial (or substantive for that matter) as a pure test of obedience without there being more depth or reason.<\/p>\n<p>It seems to be a favorite Sunday School answer in modern times to excuse irrational behavior on the part of our leaders. God doesn&#8217;t sit back thinking of ways to test our obedience. His commandments and counsel come from greater depths to benefit US.<\/p>\n<p>Even Christ said the Sabbath was for us, not us for the Sabbath. We don&#8217;t exist to be obedient to random rules. Our leaders don&#8217;t have callings to create stumbling blocks to see if we&#8217;ll stop thinking.<\/p>\n<p>The &#8220;test of obedience&#8221; thing reminds me eerily of my former brother in law who would randomly create rules to test his kids and when they saw through his ineptitude and disobeyed he&#8217;d punish them. Is that the type of God we worship? <\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ll take a different Father in Heaven, thank you.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Very eloquent, Ralph, but I am going to disagree.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps our best example is the Akedah, or Abraham&#8217;s near-sacrifice of Isaac.  Could there have been any other purpose to this event than a test of Abraham&#8217;s obedience?  While many commandments might have purposes other than &#8216;just testing,&#8217; I am not sure that we can limit God by saying &#8216;every command will have a reason.&#8217;  What would be the justification for this?<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;d also like to note that one of the factors making the Akedah a particularly good test of obedience is Abraham&#8217;s background of, and presumed hatred for, the <a href=\"http:\/\/scriptures.lds.org\/abr\/1\">human sacrifices <\/a>practiced by his own people.  So, there is a level of irony here&#8211;a crown to the challenge.  (We also see this in the <a href=\"http:\/\/scriptures.lds.org\/gen\/16\">parallel story <\/a>of Hagar and Ishmael in the wilderness, where Hagar being kicked out has an ironic and painful echo of her own decision to leave the camp years previous.)  I&#8217;d suggest that something like The Beard Rule is a good candidate for being a test of obedience, because it does seem ironic that the Church and\/or God would <a href=\"http:\/\/scriptures.lds.org\/1_sam\/16\/7#7\">care about appearances<\/a>.  I think the SSM debate (which you are welcome to discuss on another thread, not here) may also serve this purpose (i.e., a test of obedience, with the ironic level given the Church&#8217;s history with polygamy) for some of the Saints.<\/p>\n<p>However, I do agree with Ralph that it would not be a good idea to knee-jerk with every commandment we don&#8217;t understand and claim that it is just there to test our obedience.  I am not sure what we might do to stop that from happening, however.  Can we articulate a standard?<\/p>\n<p>P.S.&#8211;If there are any teenagers reading this, my brother got a lot of mileage out of the following for several years:<\/p>\n<p>Child:  &#8220;Mom?&#8221;<br \/>\nMother:  &#8220;What?&#8221;<br \/>\nChild:  &#8220;Just testing.&#8221;<br \/>\nMother:  &#8220;Argghh.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>. . . if it were an actual commandment, this message would be followed by a theologically sound explanation . . .&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1001","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general-doctrine"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1001","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1001"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1001\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1001"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1001"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timesandseasons.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1001"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}