Are Black and Hispanic Men Called as Bishops as Much as White Men?

The other day I realized that Duke University’s National Congregations Study, which includes about 87 randomly sampled LDS wards, has information on the race and ethnicity of the “person who is the head or senior clergy person or religious leader in your congregation,” which I assume in the Latter-day Saint case is the bishop, so I decided to see if we can glean any information about how racially representative leadership is relative to membership.

Upfront, statistically this is very much seeing through a glass darkly, but frankly I think it’s the only information that we non-COB employees have on this subject, so it’s worth taking a look.

The NCS had four waves: 1998, 2006, 2012, and 2018. The NCS piggy backed off of another survey that is taken almost every year, the General Social Survey, with some individuals asked more detailed questions about their religious congregation. (For the wonks; weights with small cell sizes can get squampous, plus the GSS that the NCS is based on is a relatively self-weighted survey already, so for my purposes here I’m not going to worry about the weights). If we simply look at the racial/ethnic composition of Latter-day Saint bishops by year we have the following table. (For some reason WordPress is cutting off the image; apologies.)

As you can see, we only have 23 wards/branches in 2018, 19 in 2012, 35 in 2006, and 9 in 1998. However, this isn’t nothing. Obviously, the vast majority of leaders are non-Hispanic white, but so are the members (for now), so the question is whether leaders are more or less diverse than we’d expect given the composition of the membership in general.

The latest Pew numbers in 2014 reported that 8% of members identify as Latino, and 1% identify as Black. Given the incredibly low number of Black members, it is statistically difficult to be able to say that Black people are underrepresented in leadership positions. We’d need a much larger sample size to say that, but of the 44 wards surveyed in 1998 and 2006, none of them had a Black bishop, so make of that what you will. Only one of them had a Hispanic bishop. I don’t know what the percentage of members in the US who were Hispanics was during that time period, but it is likely that, in this sample, Hispanics were underrepresented among leadership positions.

However, things are very different when we look at the more recent waves. Of the 42 bishops during the more recent waves, six of them were Hispanic, or 14%. However, one of them was included in a Hispanic congregation oversample, so If we remove that ward we have five Hispanic bishops for 41 congregations. If we take the Pew numbers at face value and perform a simple statistical test (for the wonks, a cumulative binomial probability test), we find that, if there was perfect representativeness among leadership for Hispanics at 8%, that there is a 77% chance that four or fewer bishops out of a random draw of 41 would be Hispanic, which suggests that given their baseline population Hispanic men are actually more likely to be called as bishops.

For Black men, if we set the baseline percentage at 1%, the chance of there being only one or no Black bishops in our sample is 94%, so once again it looks like there is a good chance that Black men are, nowadays, actually more likely to be called as bishops than their non-Black counterparts.

Now, there are a lot of different assumptions baked into these numbers (e.g. what you identify as is the same as what your congregation identifies you as, the GSS’ particular cluster sampling for that year isn’t throwing things off, etc.), so I’m not married to this position, but preliminarily at least, given the numbers we have, it looks like while local-level leadership may have been disproportionately white back in the day, more recently bishops are actually more likely to be racial/ethnic minorities than the average member.

*Asians are often combined with Pacific Islanders (except when they’re not), and they were measured differently in Pew and the GSS, so given the particular salience of the latter group in the Latter-day Saint community and the low numbers overall, I didn’t think running the numbers on that category would be accurate enough to provide any kind of a plausible estimate.

**Normally I post my R code on my Github page, but this is simple enough I’ll just post it here in case anyone wants to play around with the numbers.

library(dplyr)

LDS = filter(Cong,DENOM==”Mormon”)

table(LDS$CLERRACE, LDS$YEAR)

table(LDS$WT_WAVE3_NOHISP_CONG_IGN, LDS$CLERRACE)

pbinom(4, size=41, prob=0.08)
pbinom(1, size=41, prob=0.01)

 

 

 

6 comments for “Are Black and Hispanic Men Called as Bishops as Much as White Men?

  1. Very interesting. Thanks, Stephen. My only comment is probably a distraction from the importance of the actual topic, but: R is awesome. The way it makes powerful statistical tools available at a conceptual level is amazing to experience.

  2. The LDS Maps Meetinghouse Locator provides the surname of every bishop and branch president along with a street address for the congregation. Previous studies have shown that race and ethnicity can be predicted fairly accurately with surname and ZIP code. If you combined these two methods, it could yield a larger sample. One variable that might hard to control is the size of the congregation. For instance, if a sizable number of Hispanic bishops in the U.S. are serving in small wards, that could increase the odds that the men in those congregations would serve as a bishop at some point in their life.

  3. Brilliant idea Sterling; I think I’ve figured out how to scrape the locator for every meetinghouse worldwide, which would be a fun dataset to play with for a number of different reasons.

  4. Thanks for doing this work, Stephen! What an ingenious way to get some data on something I wouldn’t have thought we could find out. And the results are encouraging. Great post!

  5. In our Riverina Stake, centred in Finley, New South Wales , Australia we have 8 units. Four units have Polynesian Bishops a fifth unit until recently had a Fijian Bishop. Two Polynesian Bishops preside over either mixed race or mostly Anglo/Celtic congregations the other two are mostly Polynesian congregations. A counsellor in our Stake Presidency is Filipino. There is no thought of racial preference. The best candidate gets the calling.

  6. Further comment. This whole exercise seems a bit disingenuous to me. The actual question is really “ is the LDS Church becoming less racist?” Given the church is established in more than 100 countries including Africa and Asia one can only assume the church is not racist. I cannot imagine that such a small sample, of probably geographically close, stakes could possibly produce a sensible result. Go do the survey in Africa or Asia and you’d probably conclude that the Church has a very active affirmative action program going on. Such a US or Utah centred view. There is a whole other world out here and God loves us all equally.

Charitable Comments Welcome. Please follow our comment policy

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.