Especially in light of it leading people out of the Church to Snufferism, polygamy and the like:
https://mormonleaks.io/wiki/documents/2/2e/Stake_President_Reports_Apostasy.pdf
I wonder if “real” and “counterfeit” are not often labels that are attached respectively to “my interpretation of my experience” and “my interpretation of your apparently contrary experience.”
]]>A fantastic book on this is Ronald Walker’s Wayward Saints. As a funny aside, it’s out of that movement that we end up with the Salt Lake Tribune.
]]>We have an odd history with what most could call superstition and sorcery. I think the Church’s opinion has been of the general “if it brings you closer to God, it’s of God. If it takes you away from God (or the Church, or toward following a specific person other than Christ), then it’s counterfeit, and should be avoided.
I can think of more than a few health fads that skirt the line with “sorcery”, especially when their draw is a thinly veiled MLM.
]]>The rising generation are proud, haughty, high-minded, lovers of pleasure more than lovers of God; fighting against His people; given to whoredom and prostitution and all manner of iniquity and abominations; guilty of all the abominations named by the apostle that should characterize the false churches of the latter days, having a form of godliness but denying the power thereof. That is, denying the gifts of healing, miracles, prophecy, revelation, the ministering and discerning of spirits. All these things were denied when the Book of Mormon came forth. Of course the devil saw that it was not policy, with all the Scriptures staring them in the face, and all the Latter-day Saint Elders quoting these Scriptures to show the necessity of the gifts, to keep them denying these gifts; hence he introduced them under the name of Spiritualism. As soon as the Book of Mormon came forth, the counterfeit then spread like the counterfeit gifts exercised by the old magicians of Egypt. When Moses went down with the power and authority of Heaven, the counterfeit sprang up in order to delude the Egyptians, and make them think the power of Moses was the same in character as that exercised by the magicians. When Moses threw down his rod it became a serpent; the rods of the magicians did the same. When Moses brought up frogs on the land, they did the same; when he turned the rivers of water into blood, they did the same; and thus they deluded the Egyptian nation, and made them believe that if the power of Moses was superior to theirs, it was only because he had learned the magic art more thoroughly than they had.
So the rhetoric is pretty old and probably pre-dates Mormonism.
]]>Mary Ann’s context for the Ensign article is very informative I think.
On the discussion of sorcery… well I’d go back to the good fruits argument, which seems pretty in line with john f.’s excerpt above. I do think it is a bigger thing in society than we would perhaps like to imagine. There are occasional news reports of ritual killings discovered. But with less hype and hysteria than the reports of the 80s and 90s Jean refers to, so maybe that’s lessons learned…
]]>But I think it does highlight how rumors can spread and how people will leap unnecessarily to other worldly explanations.
KM, at least as I read the article, it was more focused on counterfeits with sorcery just mentioned as an example of a counterfeit. I don’t think you can read Elder Lawrence as tying gay marriage to sorcery. Rather he’s more just suggesting counterfeits as a major problem. I think anyone who uses this talk to be emboldened to say inclinations are all just a choice need only be pointed towards the recent church resources on homosexuality which pointedly go the other direction. Unfortunately the church doesn’t really have any answers for what a person with such inclinations ought do to be fulfilled in this life. Hopefully they are fasting and praying on that so they can offer what the Lord wants people to do.
Related to the article, I think speaking of satan as real and as having the ability to tempt us is pretty mainstream. But I don’t think it’s important enough to make a big deal out of. If you think it’s all placebo effect (or its inverse) and misinterpretation that’s fine.
]]>(Told you my hometown was loopy. I have so many stories like this.)
]]>In my own family a great and heartbreaking rift has been caused by the response to one beloved niece’s coming out. She is still a minor, but the response to her by one part of the family has been that being gay is a choice, and that she can use her gift of agency in another way.
The family members who have addressed her in this way will surely feel greatly emboldened by Elder Lawrence’s article, and they will fear all the more for her salvation. This will not cause them to reach out to her in support, but in fear for her soul, which will help no one.
This article is destructive.
]]>