Comments on: Society for Mormon Philosophy and Theology

By: Clark Goble

Clark Goble — Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:47:23 +0000

Yup. Even though I’ve not been involved I’ll try and set an alarm to help out next year. Unfortunately I had a basement flood and then some contractors who caused more problems and delays plus working 7 days a week for about 4 weeks. This is all volunteer work and most of the involved people are also professors often with church callings on top of it. So any volunteers I’m sure would always be welcome.

I may actually finally submit my paper I’ve been working on for a while. I might try out some of the arguments here over the next couple of months.

There also weren’t recordings this year. So unfortunately no listening to the sessions at the gym.

By: ricke

ricke — Mon, 17 Oct 2016 00:39:58 +0000

I live out of town but would have considered driving to Provo to attend, but I couldn’t seem to find any meaningful information in advance about the program. There wasn’t anything at the SMPT website or the Facebook page. I found the conference dates, but I wish the program could have been advertised a little better.

By: Clark Goble

Clark Goble — Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:36:30 +0000

JPV you mean here or on the SMPT website? I’m outside room B192 right now waiting for things to start so I can’t do much about the SMPT web sight. The link in the above works fine for me though.

It’s in the JFSB (the new education building to the west of the library and south of the math building) in the basement in room B192. That’s the big auditorium. There are signs up outside.

By: jpv

jpv — Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:55:30 +0000

Clark, Ben. There’s no clear link to this on the website, and the email listed is bouncing.

By: Clark Goble

Clark Goble — Wed, 12 Oct 2016 22:12:41 +0000

Some speakers assume more familiarity with certain philosophers and ways of thinking than others. I think though there's typically a pretty good cross section of both types of philosophy (more continental philosophy, more analytic philosophy) and how technical the sessions are. For instance Paulson usually speaks in a fashion easily understandable at a lay level. I confess I hope there are more technical discussions too as I think one problem in Mormon theology and philosophy is that there are lots of papers or arguments that orient a topic but few that then pursue that line of reasoning. That's why as glad as I am of popularizers like Terryl Givens I'm also exceedingly glad that there are people like Blake Ostler pushing things farther. Although I should also add that while Blake's books are long part of that is because he's writing in a fashion to bring new readers up so they can understand the issues he raises. So they work as a great way of introducing the topic to people without a background in philosophy. I should also note that culturally we're pretty different from the era when Joseph F. Smith wrote that. He never attended college. Today a significant number of people do and typically encounter a much broader array of ideas than the typical member then did. Likewise today there are tons of resources for those interested in more narrow and careful questioning of ideas. Wikipedia for all its flaws can orient people around terminology. The SEP and IEP are fantastic free resources for getting up to speed on the idea of most philosophy movements. There's also tons of literature out there from the Oxford Press, University of Illinois Press, Kofford Books, Maxwell Institute, FAIR, and the Interpreter. There's also blogs like this one, BCC and many more that do careful discussions on these issues and encourage feedback or questions.

By: Stephen Wight

Stephen Wight — Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:52:32 +0000

Joseph F. Smith wrote: “One thing about this so-called philosophy of religion that is very undesirable, lies in the fact
that as soon as we convert our religion into a system of philosophy none but philosophers can understand, appreciate, or enjoy it.” This is true to a certain degree with the proceedings of “The Society for Mormon Philosophy and Theology.” This should not be unexpected, given the very name of the organization. Nevertheless, I have enjoyed the meetings I have attended. Some of the presentations are very erudite, but in lay language, and easy to understand by anyone. Others have required me, in order to understand what the heck is being said, to sit on the back row with my iPhone dictionary, translating philosophical terms into understandable English. That is fine by me, as groups within the Church deserve the right to discuss it in the language of their particular profession. A meeting discussing aspects of the Gospel by LDS physicians is going to sound different than a meeting discussing the same Gospel through the eyes of those trained in philosophy, and accustomed to its vocabulary. After all, the ultimate word of God to his prophets, whether trained or untrained, farmers or scribes, etc. has been “after the manner of their language, that they might come to understanding.” We pretty much do the same thing (and a good thing if we don’t place our philosophy and learning above the original revealed word) in our discussions of the Gospel, that is, in terms of the language in which we are most comfortable communicating.