Comments on: Reading Nephi – 4:20-38 https://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php/2015/10/reading-nephi-420-38/ Truth Will Prevail Sun, 05 Aug 2018 23:56:25 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.8 By: Clark Goble https://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php/2015/10/reading-nephi-420-38/#comment-534611 Mon, 02 Nov 2015 16:38:48 +0000 http://timesandseasons.org/?p=34248#comment-534611 Aaron, while It’s purely speculative, I’ve thought that the whole Sons of Moses / School of the Prophets might be operative. That is we portray the OT and even BoM model as people merely getting a vision and then going and prophesying with no structure. I’m not entirely convinced that’s the case. We just historically don’t know how people’s worship went. Is exposure to scripture common? How were the sayings of the prophets distributed? (Meaning Isaiah, Jeremiah and more contemporary figures)

If this is the case (and again this is very speculative) then there was a group passing around texts, literate, and very, very familiar with the geopolitics of the situation with Babylon, Egypt and Zedekiah. In this case Nephi probably already knew who Zoram was. (Especially if there’s some unspoken conflict over who is allowed to see the main scriptures due to disputes among religious groups)

]]>
By: James Olsen https://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php/2015/10/reading-nephi-420-38/#comment-534606 Mon, 02 Nov 2015 00:26:20 +0000 http://timesandseasons.org/?p=34248#comment-534606 Aaron, those are great points. I’ve not considered the fact that they were admitted and what that might say. I wish we knew about Laban, more of who he was, his position, his overall status in the community. Also, although the text makes it sound serendipitous, there’s no reason to think that Nephi didn’t already know who Zoram was and where to seek him out.

]]>
By: Aaron Curtis https://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php/2015/10/reading-nephi-420-38/#comment-534602 Sun, 01 Nov 2015 07:13:02 +0000 http://timesandseasons.org/?p=34248#comment-534602 I think theres more to the story in terms of the relationship between Lehi’s and Laban’s families / clans. First off, Laman gains an audience with Laban to make his initial request for the plates only to be threatened with death for attempted robbery. Then Nephi and his brothers gain a second audience with Laban. (I imagine Laman was quite nervous during this visit.). These are not visits in which they’re rebuffed at the door. Nephi describes Laban as seeing their treasure and lusting after it. Laman seems familiar with the size of Laban’s forces. Nephi knows where the plates of brass are kept and where the treasury of Laban is. Nephi recognizes Zoram on the way to the treasury and knows that he has the keys. (I think this is more than just finding the custodian with the huge key ring at the high school.) I don’t think this is the first time they’ve met.

What I find interesting about Nephi’s mentioning of Zoram bringing up the elders of the Jews is that Nephi has enough knowledge to maintain a credible conversation about the elders of the Jews. To me, this also tells something of Zoram’s role here. Common guards don’t need to have knowledge of the leaders of the community or of the church. I suspect Zoram’s role is more record keeper / scribe. I think there’s more in Zoram’s contribution to the story in this chapter as well as in the Book of Mormon narrative as a whole, but I need to think through that more.

Thus I think there’s familiarity among these families. Evidently it’s not close family relations, as chapter 5 suggests Lehi wasn’t completely aware of his genealogy until he reads the brass plates. But I think this passage deserves continued close reading.

]]>
By: James Olsen https://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php/2015/10/reading-nephi-420-38/#comment-534600 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 21:45:08 +0000 http://timesandseasons.org/?p=34248#comment-534600 Clark I know I take this up in chapter 5 though I honestly don’t remember what I say. At any rate, ancient scriptures were a fantastically arduous and time consuming affair — even as scrolls. No one owned them. Of course we have the famous discovery of Deuteronomy (assuming it was either of those things) in the temple. And hundreds of years later we have record of the scrolls being copied and kept in communal locations of worship. Perhaps Nephi had opportunity to hear some things read at the temple on feast days or some such but I doubt it. I don’t think those were family affairs — I doubt that most devout men had such opportunity let alone boys.

]]>
By: Clark Goble https://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php/2015/10/reading-nephi-420-38/#comment-534597 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:23:30 +0000 http://timesandseasons.org/?p=34248#comment-534597 That’s a great point James about how many scriptures Nephi would know prior to having the brass plates. I’d not even considered that. But if they had access to scriptures, even in scrolls, why would they need the plates? (Beyond the genealogy issues)

The issue of genealogy seems very weird to me. It must be something in their plates different from our plates. Even though (as anyone who’s tried to read the Torah knows) genealogy was important for them. It pops up in very weird places. I don’t think we have enough information to know why this was such a big deal for them.

]]>
By: James Olsen https://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php/2015/10/reading-nephi-420-38/#comment-534594 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 15:15:47 +0000 http://timesandseasons.org/?p=34248#comment-534594 Boy, I’ve missed the action. A few responses:

N.W. Clerk: I’ll admit, I chuckled at your comment. In all seriousness, however, it was difficult to decide to post these entries. I didn’t craft them with an agenda for self-representation, but there’s no question that they reveal a great deal about me—about what strikes me as salient, what I value, my personal struggles and weaknesses, etc. Because they were written as a journal, I’m fairly candid. And as you hint, even that which I’m not candid about is vulnerable to analysis.

I think this is a function of all good scripture when we approach it as scripture: it opens us up and acquaints us with ourselves—as well as with God.

Clark: I’m glad you brought up the deception—I have a similar discomfort with the facts as portrayed. I don’t see a clear way out. Zoram did in fact take Nephi to get the plates and did join their venture, and Nephi does seem to have been wearing Laban’s clothes. But it’s almost a childish sort of deception story. If we bracket the possibility that the deception was miraculous, I’m not sure what to do.

And I tend to think Dave’s right about marriage—the classic means of reconciliation and political binding.

David: Yes, I think Nephi’s clearly drawing on the verses in Exodus and Deuteronomy—but this is the older Nephi. I think it more likely that he had never heard these verses before obtaining the brass plates (and who knows how long it was before he was genuinely familiar with them). Again, I think all of this argues for a very carefully crafted narrative, in response to the then current (i.e., older-Nephi timeframe) criticism.

Incidentally, this is also another FARMS-style evidence of historicity; it strikes me as hugely implausible that Joseph Smith would’ve been familiar with these passages and so able to carefully craft a literary narrative built on them (I can’t remember if Welch makes that point or not).

Clark: as noted in other posts, I think they had to have another genealogy than Genesis in mind—it’s conspicuous that this is Lehi’s originally articulated reason for obtaining the plates, and it’s also the first thing he searches the plates for—to get an accurate view of his own lineage.

Also, while we don’t have solid evidence, the idea that Lehi considered himself part of the Moshivites seems more plausible than not (given his initial criticalness, willingness to leave Jerusalem, and immediately build an altar; plus the fact that we know he’s descended from Joseph not Aaron, Judah or Benjamin).

]]>
By: Clark Goble https://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php/2015/10/reading-nephi-420-38/#comment-534593 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 03:26:13 +0000 http://timesandseasons.org/?p=34248#comment-534593 Rob, I think there’s definitely an act of faith. How big a test it is I can’t tell. If Nephi’s going against what he thinks is wrong because God tells him that’s a big one. If Nephi’s simply squeamish and uncomfortable doing something he knows is right that’s a different sort of faith. I’m not sure the test is so much here with Laban as it was going back up to Jerusalem. Laban is more the fulfillment after he’s already passed the test in this reading. But of course it can definitely be read the other way too.

]]>
By: Clark Goble https://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php/2015/10/reading-nephi-420-38/#comment-534592 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 03:24:19 +0000 http://timesandseasons.org/?p=34248#comment-534592 Terry, The other alternative is that by genealogy they simply means Genesis something like we presently have it. I’m not saying there might not be an other type of genealogy mind you. Just that there are lots of alternatives. One I’ve entertained but is *very* speculative is that Lehi was descended of the sons of Moses and this suppressed priesthood in the post-exilic era. The plates differ from ours because they contain more of this tradition (thus Alma 11-14 we’ve discussed prior relative to Nephi) but also Lehi’s right to the priesthood. Put an other way it’s kind of like we all have our priesthood lineage in terms of ordination going back to Peter, James and John.

]]>
By: Terry H https://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php/2015/10/reading-nephi-420-38/#comment-534591 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 03:22:40 +0000 http://timesandseasons.org/?p=34248#comment-534591 As to Zoram, his job was the marry Ishmael’s oldest daughter, leaving the younger, fairer daughters for Lehi’s sons. (See The Lost Plates of Laman by Bob Lewis). :)

]]>
By: Terry H https://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php/2015/10/reading-nephi-420-38/#comment-534590 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 03:19:15 +0000 http://timesandseasons.org/?p=34248#comment-534590 David, here’s another thought which struck me. The Brass Plates have the record of Lehi’s family tree. Why? Are Laban and Lehi related? If not, does Laban wrongfully have the plates? Perhaps he does in two instances: (1) he isn’t family or (2) he lives “wrongfully” and therefore has abdicated his right to them. If its wrong for him to have them, has he committed some kind of offense. Typically, it was the victim’s family who was doing the avenging under the Exodus chapter 21 provisions. If the “victim” is Lehi’s family, is Nephi in the right role of “avenger”. (Of course, I think James’ concern isn’t for the legal justification or “excuse” as he’d call it for simplicity’s sake, but for whether Nephi did something he regretted as if it was a sin.) More to come.

]]>
By: Rob Osborn https://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php/2015/10/reading-nephi-420-38/#comment-534589 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 02:25:57 +0000 http://timesandseasons.org/?p=34248#comment-534589 Clark,

I think part of the oath Zoram makes is to tarry with them from that time forth and in return he gets to ride with Lehis club on safari across the desert. Sounds like a blast to me. I honestly feel like Zoram felt liberated and thus drawn to Nephi.

The killing of Laban is a test of faith for Nephi.Nephi passed the test.

]]>
By: David Day https://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php/2015/10/reading-nephi-420-38/#comment-534588 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 02:11:35 +0000 http://timesandseasons.org/?p=34248#comment-534588 I just finished re-reading Welch’s article: http://publications.maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/fullscreen/?pub=1378&index=7

We all enjoy different things, but I would strongly recommend anyone interested in the topic of Nephi killing Laban to re-read (or read for the first time) the article.

Let me do just this much of a spoiler, Nephi likely knew this verse:

Exodus 21:13 And if a man lie not in wait, but God deliver him into his hand; then I will appoint thee a place whither he shall flee.

In Nephi’s case, it turns out that the place to which he could flee was the New World.

]]>
By: Clark Goble https://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php/2015/10/reading-nephi-420-38/#comment-534585 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 01:13:11 +0000 http://timesandseasons.org/?p=34248#comment-534585 Rob (9), yes I agree with all that. But why does he stay with the Lehites even after he’s gone from Israel? There’s lots of places he could have fled to. I’m not criticizing him and I can think of possible scenarios (like he doesn’t know how to survive on his own in the wild or he’s simply a “go long with things” personality). He’s definitely a very strange case though. I’m just not satisfied with Nibley’s explanations.

Rob (12), you don’t think God could have asked Nephi to do something against the law and punishable by death? I think one can think it was illegal yet still just.

]]>
By: Rob Osborn https://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php/2015/10/reading-nephi-420-38/#comment-534582 Thu, 29 Oct 2015 21:49:07 +0000 http://timesandseasons.org/?p=34248#comment-534582 In Nephis day murder was always a sin and punishable by death. Biblical law set forth the laws or the framework of them. If we were to ask Nephi what murder is and if he murdered Laban he would probably laugh and say that Labans death was justifiable according to biblical law. In those days stealing, attempted murder, false accusations and even lying was a death sentence in certain instances. By their own law (minus corruption of kings and judges) Laban was guilty of all those crimes which was punishable by death.

]]>
By: David Day https://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php/2015/10/reading-nephi-420-38/#comment-534581 Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:10:12 +0000 http://timesandseasons.org/?p=34248#comment-534581 Rob, I do believe that Nephi was commanded to slay Laban. I really do. I believe he had the spirit with him both then and subsequently. That is really separate from the question of whether or not this was a lawful killing. For instance, Numbers 35 gives a few examples of killings that are not murder or perhaps could even be considered justified. I struggle to find similar OT language that seems “on point” for this particular fact pattern.

I’m certainly attempting to draw a distinction in my mind between “murder” as a sin and “murder” as a crime under the applicable legal system in Jerusalem circa 600 BC. I get the sense that you are not trying to draw that distinction. One problem for me is that there is substantial overlap at that time and place between God’s law and man’s law, since the Law of Moses was basically both. I am more comfortable with Nephi’s actions from a “sin” perspective then I am from a “legal” perspective. I still think it’s worth noting that we are taking Nephi’s word for this (he has no witnesses) and this is a fact pattern where most of us would immediately condemn the writer if we weren’t already heavily invested in believing his overall narrative.

Setting all of that aside, I do think it’s possible to read the part about Zoram as follows, Zoram first met Nephi as follows: Nephi was impersonating Laban and wearing Laban’s bloody clothes and as soon as Zoram realizes that it’s not Laban Nephi tells Zoram that God commanded him to kill Laban and he did so. Zoram was presumably nothing short of shocked and in that state of shock had to almost immediately make a crucial life choice. Quite an interesting story.

]]>