<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Tweet or Not to Tweet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2009/04/to-tweet-or-not-to-tweet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2009/04/to-tweet-or-not-to-tweet/</link>
	<description>Truth Will Prevail</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:57:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Murray</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2009/04/to-tweet-or-not-to-tweet/#comment-290742</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 03:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timesandseasons.org/?p=8016#comment-290742</guid>
		<description>Mark,

Leave us your @Twitter user name and we&#039;ll all &quot;eavesdrop&quot; on you.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/Guy_Murray&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@guy_murray&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>Leave us your @Twitter user name and we&#8217;ll all &#8220;eavesdrop&#8221; on you.</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/Guy_Murray" rel="nofollow">@guy_murray</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark N.</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2009/04/to-tweet-or-not-to-tweet/#comment-290737</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timesandseasons.org/?p=8016#comment-290737</guid>
		<description>After having played around with Twitter for a second evening, I think there&#039;s a high &quot;eavesdropping&quot; quotient involved there.  Click on &quot;everyone&quot;, see a snippet of what might turn out to be an interesting conversation, and you can link from tweet to tweet and from user ID to user ID ad infinitum.  You check out who&#039;s following who, and pretty soon you&#039;re absolutely lost.

I can see how it makes a good advertising medium, though.  You can put just enough into a tweet to pique someone&#039;s curiousity, use the &quot;tiny urls&quot; to disguise the actual link addresses, and it becomes a real treasure hunt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After having played around with Twitter for a second evening, I think there&#8217;s a high &#8220;eavesdropping&#8221; quotient involved there.  Click on &#8220;everyone&#8221;, see a snippet of what might turn out to be an interesting conversation, and you can link from tweet to tweet and from user ID to user ID ad infinitum.  You check out who&#8217;s following who, and pretty soon you&#8217;re absolutely lost.</p>
<p>I can see how it makes a good advertising medium, though.  You can put just enough into a tweet to pique someone&#8217;s curiousity, use the &#8220;tiny urls&#8221; to disguise the actual link addresses, and it becomes a real treasure hunt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan C</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2009/04/to-tweet-or-not-to-tweet/#comment-290732</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timesandseasons.org/?p=8016#comment-290732</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using Twitter for a couple of weeks now, and have found that it&#039;s useful for a couple of reasons: 
1, It&#039;s more interactive than blogging, so I can actually keep up with my friends in other states in a much quicker and easier way than email, and 
2, It helps me connect (call it &quot;networking&quot; if you want) with others in my industry, and participate in the conversations that are happening there (full disclosure: I&#039;m a software developer, and we&#039;re pretty geeky to begin with)
3, It gives me a window into what&#039;s going on in the world, without having to read a ton of news RSS feeds. It&#039;s where I first heard about swine flu, for example -- alerting me to the need to Google for &quot;real&quot; information about it.

As far as the issue of &quot;information overload&quot; goes, it&#039;s only 140 characters... easy enough to skim the stream and only delve into the tweets that really interest you, and avoid the &quot;Yay BBQ&quot; type posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Twitter for a couple of weeks now, and have found that it&#8217;s useful for a couple of reasons:<br />
1, It&#8217;s more interactive than blogging, so I can actually keep up with my friends in other states in a much quicker and easier way than email, and<br />
2, It helps me connect (call it &#8220;networking&#8221; if you want) with others in my industry, and participate in the conversations that are happening there (full disclosure: I&#8217;m a software developer, and we&#8217;re pretty geeky to begin with)<br />
3, It gives me a window into what&#8217;s going on in the world, without having to read a ton of news RSS feeds. It&#8217;s where I first heard about swine flu, for example &#8212; alerting me to the need to Google for &#8220;real&#8221; information about it.</p>
<p>As far as the issue of &#8220;information overload&#8221; goes, it&#8217;s only 140 characters&#8230; easy enough to skim the stream and only delve into the tweets that really interest you, and avoid the &#8220;Yay BBQ&#8221; type posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Yak</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2009/04/to-tweet-or-not-to-tweet/#comment-290683</link>
		<dc:creator>American Yak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timesandseasons.org/?p=8016#comment-290683</guid>
		<description>Twitter _will be_ a fad if they do not evolve, and if they do not evolve quickly.  Here&#039;s why:

The Internet is rapidly evolving to an external model of distributed social networks, with more and more APIs for various kinds of data feeds, and shared identity.  Two days ago Facebook opened up their activity feed/stream with a new API which has been highly anticipated by the fledgling but growing OpenID/OpenStack community.  We are at the tipping point of a radical evolution in the structure of the Internet.  What&#039;s familiar today will look radically different tomorrow.

Did I say radical change?  Yes.  AOL and CompuServe once created something that ended up evolving into what now looks fairly standard as the Internet.  A similar sea change is about to take place.  Here are a few articles hinting at that change:

http://bit.ly/za0iQ
http://bit.ly/PcQHN
http://bit.ly/3ByaJC

Many are saying they don&#039;t know exactly what the future Internet will look like, but also say it&#039;s clear it will be revamped in many ways, where data becomes ubiquitous/liquid, identity is decentralized, and data/activity streams model not only the real world but a fantastical one as well.  And Twitter will become a &quot;has been&quot; if it doesn&#039;t modify it&#039;s data stream model to fit a need greater than 140 characters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter _will be_ a fad if they do not evolve, and if they do not evolve quickly.  Here&#8217;s why:</p>
<p>The Internet is rapidly evolving to an external model of distributed social networks, with more and more APIs for various kinds of data feeds, and shared identity.  Two days ago Facebook opened up their activity feed/stream with a new API which has been highly anticipated by the fledgling but growing OpenID/OpenStack community.  We are at the tipping point of a radical evolution in the structure of the Internet.  What&#8217;s familiar today will look radically different tomorrow.</p>
<p>Did I say radical change?  Yes.  AOL and CompuServe once created something that ended up evolving into what now looks fairly standard as the Internet.  A similar sea change is about to take place.  Here are a few articles hinting at that change:</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/za0iQ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/za0iQ</a><br />
<a href="http://bit.ly/PcQHN" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/PcQHN</a><br />
<a href="http://bit.ly/3ByaJC" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3ByaJC</a></p>
<p>Many are saying they don&#8217;t know exactly what the future Internet will look like, but also say it&#8217;s clear it will be revamped in many ways, where data becomes ubiquitous/liquid, identity is decentralized, and data/activity streams model not only the real world but a fantastical one as well.  And Twitter will become a &#8220;has been&#8221; if it doesn&#8217;t modify it&#8217;s data stream model to fit a need greater than 140 characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark N.</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2009/04/to-tweet-or-not-to-tweet/#comment-290663</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timesandseasons.org/?p=8016#comment-290663</guid>
		<description>I signed up last night just to see if I could understand what the big deal is.  I failed to achieve that understanding.

Furthermore, within a half-hour or so of my signing up, at least 5 or maybe 6 people became my followers.  I can&#039;t help but wonder if &quot;stalkers&quot; isn&#039;t a little bit more like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I signed up last night just to see if I could understand what the big deal is.  I failed to achieve that understanding.</p>
<p>Furthermore, within a half-hour or so of my signing up, at least 5 or maybe 6 people became my followers.  I can&#8217;t help but wonder if &#8220;stalkers&#8221; isn&#8217;t a little bit more like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeInWeHo</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2009/04/to-tweet-or-not-to-tweet/#comment-290657</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeInWeHo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timesandseasons.org/?p=8016#comment-290657</guid>
		<description>I tweet, therefore I am.

http://twitter.com/mikeinweho</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tweet, therefore I am.</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/mikeinweho" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/mikeinweho</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonovitch</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2009/04/to-tweet-or-not-to-tweet/#comment-290647</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonovitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timesandseasons.org/?p=8016#comment-290647</guid>
		<description>When the Red River flooded in Fargo this spring, some of the most valuable information was relayed with Twitter.  

Calls for help with sandbagging in specific neighborhoods were announced and responded to in real time.  School closings, road closings, small leaks in sandbag levies, updated crest levels -- it was all on Twitter first.  

Beat the pants off the rest of the &quot;organized&quot; communication and other news outlets.  

I have a friend who compared the tens of thousands of volunteers with ants.  With so much work to be done, spread out over such a large area, and given the ability to communicate with virtually everyone at once, they (collectively) were able to complete the overall task about as efficiently as could be done.  Add more Twitter to this equation (de-centralize the communication) and the work is allocated more efficiently.  Take Twitter out (keeping all communication and organization strictly centralized) and you start to get logjams and inefficiencies very quickly.  I experienced it personally -- it was incredible.  

Twitter can be a fantastic emergency preparedness tool.  (Gives a new meaning to the term e-prep.)  Future massive emergency/catastrophic efforts/cleanups, etc., like this could learn a lot from how Twitter was used in Fargo.  

Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Red River flooded in Fargo this spring, some of the most valuable information was relayed with Twitter.  </p>
<p>Calls for help with sandbagging in specific neighborhoods were announced and responded to in real time.  School closings, road closings, small leaks in sandbag levies, updated crest levels &#8212; it was all on Twitter first.  </p>
<p>Beat the pants off the rest of the &#8220;organized&#8221; communication and other news outlets.  </p>
<p>I have a friend who compared the tens of thousands of volunteers with ants.  With so much work to be done, spread out over such a large area, and given the ability to communicate with virtually everyone at once, they (collectively) were able to complete the overall task about as efficiently as could be done.  Add more Twitter to this equation (de-centralize the communication) and the work is allocated more efficiently.  Take Twitter out (keeping all communication and organization strictly centralized) and you start to get logjams and inefficiencies very quickly.  I experienced it personally &#8212; it was incredible.  </p>
<p>Twitter can be a fantastic emergency preparedness tool.  (Gives a new meaning to the term e-prep.)  Future massive emergency/catastrophic efforts/cleanups, etc., like this could learn a lot from how Twitter was used in Fargo.  </p>
<p>Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2009/04/to-tweet-or-not-to-tweet/#comment-290633</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timesandseasons.org/?p=8016#comment-290633</guid>
		<description>Well, I tried twitter, but it was pretty much an awfully big reality check that my life is not that exciting. If I twittered regularly, it would be something like this:

i just cleaned the upstairs toilet. 
i need to watch the clock so i don&#039;t forget to pick up my daughter from pre-school.
finished unloading the dishwasher. 
another load of laundry.
555th poopy diaper changed. 

see what I&#039;m sayin&#039;?

Your only hope if you have no life is too be terribly witty instead.
example:

so if you totally want to obsess about the swine flu, you can track it on google maps. watch death and destruction come straight to your door via the internet! yay technology!
or
I hope my daughter grows up to be just like paris hilton.

so, no, i&#039;m not really twittering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I tried twitter, but it was pretty much an awfully big reality check that my life is not that exciting. If I twittered regularly, it would be something like this:</p>
<p>i just cleaned the upstairs toilet.<br />
i need to watch the clock so i don&#8217;t forget to pick up my daughter from pre-school.<br />
finished unloading the dishwasher.<br />
another load of laundry.<br />
555th poopy diaper changed. </p>
<p>see what I&#8217;m sayin&#8217;?</p>
<p>Your only hope if you have no life is too be terribly witty instead.<br />
example:</p>
<p>so if you totally want to obsess about the swine flu, you can track it on google maps. watch death and destruction come straight to your door via the internet! yay technology!<br />
or<br />
I hope my daughter grows up to be just like paris hilton.</p>
<p>so, no, i&#8217;m not really twittering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Willey</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2009/04/to-tweet-or-not-to-tweet/#comment-290626</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Willey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timesandseasons.org/?p=8016#comment-290626</guid>
		<description>I can barely keep up with my facebook page,  I do not have the energy for twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can barely keep up with my facebook page,  I do not have the energy for twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WillF</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2009/04/to-tweet-or-not-to-tweet/#comment-290624</link>
		<dc:creator>WillF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timesandseasons.org/?p=8016#comment-290624</guid>
		<description>#21, on your point #5 I would agree, although there is a good solution: http://apps.facebook.com/selectivetwitter/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#21, on your point #5 I would agree, although there is a good solution: <a href="http://apps.facebook.com/selectivetwitter/" rel="nofollow">http://apps.facebook.com/selectivetwitter/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
