<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Notes from all over.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/06/notes-from-all-over-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/06/notes-from-all-over-4/</link>
	<description>Truth Will Prevail</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:12:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/06/notes-from-all-over-4/#comment-266910</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 02:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timesandseasons.org/?p=4605#comment-266910</guid>
		<description>Sorry to threadjack but this is also relates to a noteworthy event this week.  Howard Fineman, speaking on his friend Tim Russert said: 

&quot;Iâ€™m not Catholic, Iâ€™m Jewish, but Iâ€™ll tell you, If I ever thought about being Catholic, Tim would be the best advertisement for that faith that there is.  I happened to attend, almost sneak in I would say, but attend...the Al Smith Dinner in New York which is the big dinner of all the Irish-Catholic pols in New York...and Tim was in his element and he took a double take when he saw me there because I was just trying to cover a political story. I was not properly dressed of course and nobody could be more embracing and welcoming than Tim.  He said, &#039;you know we might try to bring you over Fineman, we might try to real you in.&#039;    And you know what, he would have been a great fisherman for his faith to use the analogy on purpose.  Obviously his faith animated him... in whatever way he expressed it he was a very deeply devout Catholic....I think the faith that he must have learned up in Buffalo from his parents that he grew up in, in that Catholic community in Buffalo meant everything to him and helped guide and focus him and keep him grounded in this city where way too many people pursue false gods.  And Tim was the kind of guy who never pursued false Gods.  He pursued the real one.&quot;
    
&lt;a href=&quot;http://http://www.newsweek.com/id/141636 &quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;see here&lt;/a&gt;

See also the related essay by Jon Meacham.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to threadjack but this is also relates to a noteworthy event this week.  Howard Fineman, speaking on his friend Tim Russert said: </p>
<p>&#8220;Iâ€™m not Catholic, Iâ€™m Jewish, but Iâ€™ll tell you, If I ever thought about being Catholic, Tim would be the best advertisement for that faith that there is.  I happened to attend, almost sneak in I would say, but attend&#8230;the Al Smith Dinner in New York which is the big dinner of all the Irish-Catholic pols in New York&#8230;and Tim was in his element and he took a double take when he saw me there because I was just trying to cover a political story. I was not properly dressed of course and nobody could be more embracing and welcoming than Tim.  He said, &#8216;you know we might try to bring you over Fineman, we might try to real you in.&#8217;    And you know what, he would have been a great fisherman for his faith to use the analogy on purpose.  Obviously his faith animated him&#8230; in whatever way he expressed it he was a very deeply devout Catholic&#8230;.I think the faith that he must have learned up in Buffalo from his parents that he grew up in, in that Catholic community in Buffalo meant everything to him and helped guide and focus him and keep him grounded in this city where way too many people pursue false gods.  And Tim was the kind of guy who never pursued false Gods.  He pursued the real one.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://http://www.newsweek.com/id/141636 " rel="nofollow">see here</a></p>
<p>See also the related essay by Jon Meacham.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Researcher</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/06/notes-from-all-over-4/#comment-266879</link>
		<dc:creator>Researcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timesandseasons.org/?p=4605#comment-266879</guid>
		<description>&quot;a guessing bias towards female classification&quot;

I&#039;ve seen that in my family history. A Swedish child named HÃ«lje had his temple work done as a female although it said &quot;Pilte B.&quot; (male child) right there in the record. I assume that the lady who did the work read the name as some variant of &quot;Helga.&quot;

And by the way, congratulations to FAIR and T&amp;S for this effort at rapprochement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;a guessing bias towards female classification&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen that in my family history. A Swedish child named HÃ«lje had his temple work done as a female although it said &#8220;Pilte B.&#8221; (male child) right there in the record. I assume that the lady who did the work read the name as some variant of &#8220;Helga.&#8221;</p>
<p>And by the way, congratulations to FAIR and T&amp;S for this effort at rapprochement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keller</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/06/notes-from-all-over-4/#comment-266878</link>
		<dc:creator>Keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timesandseasons.org/?p=4605#comment-266878</guid>
		<description>#21, I find myself agreeing with Ardis in 21. Let&#039;s pause for a moment to acknowledge that it is possible for someone from FAIR and the Bloggernacle elite to agree on something :) 

I will try to look up mormon immigration records and see if there is any male-female discrepancy, but I think the default assumption should be close to a 50-50 split. Last night I went through a 10000 name list on the internet of potential Mormon Scandinavian immigrants and tried to guess male names from female ones and came up with a 54-46 female-male ratio, but that could reflect a propensty of mine to have a guessing bias towards female classification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#21, I find myself agreeing with Ardis in 21. Let&#8217;s pause for a moment to acknowledge that it is possible for someone from FAIR and the Bloggernacle elite to agree on something :) </p>
<p>I will try to look up mormon immigration records and see if there is any male-female discrepancy, but I think the default assumption should be close to a 50-50 split. Last night I went through a 10000 name list on the internet of potential Mormon Scandinavian immigrants and tried to guess male names from female ones and came up with a 54-46 female-male ratio, but that could reflect a propensty of mine to have a guessing bias towards female classification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ardis Parshall</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/06/notes-from-all-over-4/#comment-266860</link>
		<dc:creator>Ardis Parshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timesandseasons.org/?p=4605#comment-266860</guid>
		<description>21: Can&#039;t speak to your no. 1 or why the boys stayed where they did, or their marital success there.  As for your no. 2, that&#039;s just plain false, if you intend to suggest that women came in numbers out of proportion to the men who came. You&#039;re repeating anti-Mormon claims of newspapers and lady novelists, and there is no truth to your assertion. None whatsoever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>21: Can&#8217;t speak to your no. 1 or why the boys stayed where they did, or their marital success there.  As for your no. 2, that&#8217;s just plain false, if you intend to suggest that women came in numbers out of proportion to the men who came. You&#8217;re repeating anti-Mormon claims of newspapers and lady novelists, and there is no truth to your assertion. None whatsoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/06/notes-from-all-over-4/#comment-266857</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timesandseasons.org/?p=4605#comment-266857</guid>
		<description>My personal view form my family history study. 1) My Swedish family left with 4 girls and four boys. The girls continued on to Utah and all became Polygamists wifes, The boy stayed in Minnesota where the pickings were better. 2) In the 1860s, the North block the South&#039;s shipment of cotton the England, causing the Textile plants to close leaving a lot of unemployed girl, many the came to Utah and married.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My personal view form my family history study. 1) My Swedish family left with 4 girls and four boys. The girls continued on to Utah and all became Polygamists wifes, The boy stayed in Minnesota where the pickings were better. 2) In the 1860s, the North block the South&#8217;s shipment of cotton the England, causing the Textile plants to close leaving a lot of unemployed girl, many the came to Utah and married.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keller</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/06/notes-from-all-over-4/#comment-266814</link>
		<dc:creator>Keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 01:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timesandseasons.org/?p=4605#comment-266814</guid>
		<description>Bookslinger,

Thanks for your comments. I have been thinking about expanding my research and possibly publishing it somewhere, and if so the concerns you raise would be worth addressing.

You are right that 1880 snap shot statistics can give only part of the picture, especially when polygamy was much more prevalent in 1857 during the Mormon Reformation. Did you look at the Daynes article I referenced in the comments? I think her charts provide startling confirmation for my theory of pyramidal age demographics enabling polygamy by increasing marital age differences. Here is a quote from page 106

&lt;blockquote&gt;In any case, promoting plural marriages clearly did &quot; not prevent most young men from marrying.&quot; When there were more single men than women because of &quot; plural marriage in nineteenth-century Manti, how did such a high &quot; proportion marry and marry at relatively young ages? Single men &quot; found wives by seeking them among women whose ages differed &quot; considerably from their own. This was particularly true for the &quot; earlier Utah cohort when polygamy created the greatest marriage &quot; squeeze against men, as Figure 5 reveals.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You suggest my analysis didn&#039;t account for &quot;lost boys in Utah who left the state&quot; and that would be correct. I recently looked this up and Utah&#039;s male-female ratio was precisely the same as the US as a whole (51-49) which, at least preliminarily, suggests there was no male exodus away from Utah, at least none that would make a statistical difference.

I agree that further study is needed to study what happened to some of the over 35 year olds that hadn&#039;t married yet. But if you put this against a western backdrop in 1880 and couple that with the idea that 21% of Utahns weren&#039;t Mormon:

Never-married Males
Age    2006-US 1880-US 1880-UT 1880- NV
15-19 98.5 98.8 98.6 98.7
20-24 86.7 77.3 70.3 91.7
25-29 57.4 41.1 33.5 77.3
30-34 33.4 23.8 22.7 62.0
35-39 23.3 14.9 17.4 51.1

A theoretical &quot;lost boy&quot; at even at age 35 would have to move quite a bit a ways from Utah to see better odds of getting married.

Age disparity has much more explaining power than does male-female convert ratios, but I agree I can do a more thorough job establishing that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bookslinger,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments. I have been thinking about expanding my research and possibly publishing it somewhere, and if so the concerns you raise would be worth addressing.</p>
<p>You are right that 1880 snap shot statistics can give only part of the picture, especially when polygamy was much more prevalent in 1857 during the Mormon Reformation. Did you look at the Daynes article I referenced in the comments? I think her charts provide startling confirmation for my theory of pyramidal age demographics enabling polygamy by increasing marital age differences. Here is a quote from page 106</p>
<blockquote><p>In any case, promoting plural marriages clearly did &#8221; not prevent most young men from marrying.&#8221; When there were more single men than women because of &#8221; plural marriage in nineteenth-century Manti, how did such a high &#8221; proportion marry and marry at relatively young ages? Single men &#8221; found wives by seeking them among women whose ages differed &#8221; considerably from their own. This was particularly true for the &#8221; earlier Utah cohort when polygamy created the greatest marriage &#8221; squeeze against men, as Figure 5 reveals.</p></blockquote>
<p>You suggest my analysis didn&#8217;t account for &#8220;lost boys in Utah who left the state&#8221; and that would be correct. I recently looked this up and Utah&#8217;s male-female ratio was precisely the same as the US as a whole (51-49) which, at least preliminarily, suggests there was no male exodus away from Utah, at least none that would make a statistical difference.</p>
<p>I agree that further study is needed to study what happened to some of the over 35 year olds that hadn&#8217;t married yet. But if you put this against a western backdrop in 1880 and couple that with the idea that 21% of Utahns weren&#8217;t Mormon:</p>
<p>Never-married Males<br />
Age    2006-US 1880-US 1880-UT 1880- NV<br />
15-19 98.5 98.8 98.6 98.7<br />
20-24 86.7 77.3 70.3 91.7<br />
25-29 57.4 41.1 33.5 77.3<br />
30-34 33.4 23.8 22.7 62.0<br />
35-39 23.3 14.9 17.4 51.1</p>
<p>A theoretical &#8220;lost boy&#8221; at even at age 35 would have to move quite a bit a ways from Utah to see better odds of getting married.</p>
<p>Age disparity has much more explaining power than does male-female convert ratios, but I agree I can do a more thorough job establishing that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookslinger</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/06/notes-from-all-over-4/#comment-266802</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookslinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 23:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timesandseasons.org/?p=4605#comment-266802</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always thought that the &quot;harem building&quot; charges that were lobbed against the missionaries in England were due to people combining the two observations: 1) more women than men were joining the church, and 2) Mormons practice polygamy, therefore the natural conclusion is....

Researcher:   I don&#039;t know if the FLDS drove out their so-called &quot;lost boys&quot; in order to create a bigger pool of available marriagble women, or whether certain boys or young adults left on their own _after_ they observed that there were no available single women left in their age range.  There have been so many false charges concerning the FLDS, I don&#039;t know what to believe.  

The same cause/effect question would be applicable to 19th century LDS polygamy.   I doubt there was any conspiracy to kick out young men for the purpose of creating a bigger pool of women available to become multiple wives.  I don&#039;t think anyone has seriously made that charge against 19th century LDS polygamists.    &lt;i&gt;If&lt;/i&gt; there were any LDS lost-boys, my first guess would be that they left _after_ seeing they no longer had any prospects.   Though there may have been isolated exceptions.

My understanding is that polygamy was more of a calling that came from church leadership, not something a man could choose on his own.  But, that once the calling was given, the man and his current wife/wives were to decide who to bring on as a sister-wife, and with the new wife&#039;s consent, of course.  Is my understandin correct in that?

Although it was not a major cause of me going inactive, before I left the church I didn&#039;t find any marriage prospects in the church.  &quot;All the good ones were taken&quot; kind of thing. (Or at least I thought so.)    Had I stayed around for just a few more years, I would have seen some of those &quot;good ones&quot; get divorced and re-enter the &quot;available pool&quot; in my age range. (And looking back, I wasn&#039;t such a great catch myself.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always thought that the &#8220;harem building&#8221; charges that were lobbed against the missionaries in England were due to people combining the two observations: 1) more women than men were joining the church, and 2) Mormons practice polygamy, therefore the natural conclusion is&#8230;.</p>
<p>Researcher:   I don&#8217;t know if the FLDS drove out their so-called &#8220;lost boys&#8221; in order to create a bigger pool of available marriagble women, or whether certain boys or young adults left on their own _after_ they observed that there were no available single women left in their age range.  There have been so many false charges concerning the FLDS, I don&#8217;t know what to believe.  </p>
<p>The same cause/effect question would be applicable to 19th century LDS polygamy.   I doubt there was any conspiracy to kick out young men for the purpose of creating a bigger pool of women available to become multiple wives.  I don&#8217;t think anyone has seriously made that charge against 19th century LDS polygamists.    <i>If</i> there were any LDS lost-boys, my first guess would be that they left _after_ seeing they no longer had any prospects.   Though there may have been isolated exceptions.</p>
<p>My understanding is that polygamy was more of a calling that came from church leadership, not something a man could choose on his own.  But, that once the calling was given, the man and his current wife/wives were to decide who to bring on as a sister-wife, and with the new wife&#8217;s consent, of course.  Is my understandin correct in that?</p>
<p>Although it was not a major cause of me going inactive, before I left the church I didn&#8217;t find any marriage prospects in the church.  &#8220;All the good ones were taken&#8221; kind of thing. (Or at least I thought so.)    Had I stayed around for just a few more years, I would have seen some of those &#8220;good ones&#8221; get divorced and re-enter the &#8220;available pool&#8221; in my age range. (And looking back, I wasn&#8217;t such a great catch myself.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth R.</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/06/notes-from-all-over-4/#comment-266795</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 22:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timesandseasons.org/?p=4605#comment-266795</guid>
		<description>I think the FAIR blogger who put up the &quot;Lost Boys&quot; post was pretty up front that the post was simply the result of what he dug up just playing around with a few census figures. He didn&#039;t seem to be presenting it in a way that was meant to be definitive or exhaustive. Just preliminary, suggestive and speculative at this point.

As Bookslinger noted, much more exhaustive research would be needed to really nail a thesis down on the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the FAIR blogger who put up the &#8220;Lost Boys&#8221; post was pretty up front that the post was simply the result of what he dug up just playing around with a few census figures. He didn&#8217;t seem to be presenting it in a way that was meant to be definitive or exhaustive. Just preliminary, suggestive and speculative at this point.</p>
<p>As Bookslinger noted, much more exhaustive research would be needed to really nail a thesis down on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Researcher</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/06/notes-from-all-over-4/#comment-266793</link>
		<dc:creator>Researcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 22:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timesandseasons.org/?p=4605#comment-266793</guid>
		<description>I also found the Lost Boys post interesting. The idea of driving out young men in order to increase the marriage market  for polygamists is very foreign to anything I&#039;ve read in my family history. Assuming they lived past childhood, all the young men married, and if they left the state, they did so with their spouses. (Basing my conclusion on a book written by my grandpa&#039;s grandma that examined hundreds of descendant families in three lines: two hers and one of her husbands&#039; lines. I&#039;ve read the book all the way through several times.) No suggestion that the young men were competing with older polygamists.

But given the experience of the FLDS, it is a very interesting question to ask. Too bad they can&#039;t look at the 1890 census for additional information. Perhaps looking at other states for men in the correct age range who were born in the Mormon region? How difficult would that be? Thesis or dissertation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also found the Lost Boys post interesting. The idea of driving out young men in order to increase the marriage market  for polygamists is very foreign to anything I&#8217;ve read in my family history. Assuming they lived past childhood, all the young men married, and if they left the state, they did so with their spouses. (Basing my conclusion on a book written by my grandpa&#8217;s grandma that examined hundreds of descendant families in three lines: two hers and one of her husbands&#8217; lines. I&#8217;ve read the book all the way through several times.) No suggestion that the young men were competing with older polygamists.</p>
<p>But given the experience of the FLDS, it is a very interesting question to ask. Too bad they can&#8217;t look at the 1890 census for additional information. Perhaps looking at other states for men in the correct age range who were born in the Mormon region? How difficult would that be? Thesis or dissertation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/06/notes-from-all-over-4/#comment-266792</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timesandseasons.org/?p=4605#comment-266792</guid>
		<description>#2; My wife and I run a help organizing Web site for our friend dying of ALS. A commercial offer appeared, offering to host a jewelry party, with my friend to get 20% for her needs. We have gotten so many kind offers of people&#039;s time with big hearts...but this was not one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#2; My wife and I run a help organizing Web site for our friend dying of ALS. A commercial offer appeared, offering to host a jewelry party, with my friend to get 20% for her needs. We have gotten so many kind offers of people&#8217;s time with big hearts&#8230;but this was not one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
