<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How American is the Church?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/02/how-american-is-the-church/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/02/how-american-is-the-church/</link>
	<description>Truth Will Prevail</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:49:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilfried</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/02/how-american-is-the-church/#comment-250817</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilfried</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timesandseasons.org/?p=4396#comment-250817</guid>
		<description>Excellent remarks, John. &quot;Perception&quot; is indeed a key concept in all this and your referral to Amish is very relevant. Non-Mormons abroad will &quot;of course&quot; perceive Mormonism as an &quot;American religion&quot;. Mormons abroad may struggle with their identity: I don&#039;t think we&#039;ve studied this phenomenon with proper research instruments yet: when members complain about &quot;American&quot; facets of the Church, what are they exactly complaining about? Can they clearly identify those facets? And next we would have to determine how &quot;American&quot; such facets really are. To what extent do personal uneasiness-factors, independent of Americanisms, influence perception? Next the ambivalence: belonging to a clearly &quot;American&quot; church (undeniable, at least on the historical-geographical grounds, but probably on more), while maybe sharing some popular &quot;anti-American&quot; views (also to identify and analyze as to their substance). My interest in these matters stems from a desire to better understand the concept of a worldwide &quot;gospel culture&quot;. More posts to follow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent remarks, John. &#8220;Perception&#8221; is indeed a key concept in all this and your referral to Amish is very relevant. Non-Mormons abroad will &#8220;of course&#8221; perceive Mormonism as an &#8220;American religion&#8221;. Mormons abroad may struggle with their identity: I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ve studied this phenomenon with proper research instruments yet: when members complain about &#8220;American&#8221; facets of the Church, what are they exactly complaining about? Can they clearly identify those facets? And next we would have to determine how &#8220;American&#8221; such facets really are. To what extent do personal uneasiness-factors, independent of Americanisms, influence perception? Next the ambivalence: belonging to a clearly &#8220;American&#8221; church (undeniable, at least on the historical-geographical grounds, but probably on more), while maybe sharing some popular &#8220;anti-American&#8221; views (also to identify and analyze as to their substance). My interest in these matters stems from a desire to better understand the concept of a worldwide &#8220;gospel culture&#8221;. More posts to follow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mansfield</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/02/how-american-is-the-church/#comment-250774</link>
		<dc:creator>John Mansfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timesandseasons.org/?p=4396#comment-250774</guid>
		<description>Wilfried, it&#039;s a question of what the Church&#039;s essence is, but it&#039;s also a question of how others are able to perceive things.  If a non-national church doesn&#039;t altogether make sense to the perceiver, then any quality of the Mormon church, important, trivial, or imagined, is evidence of its Americanness, because after all, a church must have &lt;i&gt;some&lt;/i&gt; national identity.

As another example, a few years back I was riding trains and buses across Pennsylvania with some frequency, and I became curious about the Amish who were often my fellow passengers.  The book &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0836136659/sr=1-1/qid=1154548617/ref=pd_bbs_1/103-9688760-3743065?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Plain and Amish: An Alternative to Modern Pessimism&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; by Bernd Langin was quite informative.  It&#039;s special value was that it is a German book translated into English; the German author, who had written other material on German colonies abroad, had an instant credibility with his Amish subjects that an &quot;English&quot; American could not.  Langin wrote, for instance, that the Amish who embraced him couldn&#039;t believe that the Germans could have any cupability for World War II and figured the stories about Hitler had to be exaggerated propaganda.  The Amish affinity for Germans is a bit funny given that they fled the German domain for a reason:  they could practice their heretical religion in relative peace in America, and sure couldn&#039;t do that in their homeland.  The Amish are an example of a default mental entwining of religion and nationality even in the face of good reason to doubt the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wilfried, it&#8217;s a question of what the Church&#8217;s essence is, but it&#8217;s also a question of how others are able to perceive things.  If a non-national church doesn&#8217;t altogether make sense to the perceiver, then any quality of the Mormon church, important, trivial, or imagined, is evidence of its Americanness, because after all, a church must have <i>some</i> national identity.</p>
<p>As another example, a few years back I was riding trains and buses across Pennsylvania with some frequency, and I became curious about the Amish who were often my fellow passengers.  The book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0836136659/sr=1-1/qid=1154548617/ref=pd_bbs_1/103-9688760-3743065?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books" rel="nofollow"><i>Plain and Amish: An Alternative to Modern Pessimism</i></a> by Bernd Langin was quite informative.  It&#8217;s special value was that it is a German book translated into English; the German author, who had written other material on German colonies abroad, had an instant credibility with his Amish subjects that an &#8220;English&#8221; American could not.  Langin wrote, for instance, that the Amish who embraced him couldn&#8217;t believe that the Germans could have any cupability for World War II and figured the stories about Hitler had to be exaggerated propaganda.  The Amish affinity for Germans is a bit funny given that they fled the German domain for a reason:  they could practice their heretical religion in relative peace in America, and sure couldn&#8217;t do that in their homeland.  The Amish are an example of a default mental entwining of religion and nationality even in the face of good reason to doubt the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilfried</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/02/how-american-is-the-church/#comment-250737</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilfried</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timesandseasons.org/?p=4396#comment-250737</guid>
		<description>Thanks for these latest comments!

Cicero (70) raises an interesting question on ideology which I need to study further. My first reaction would be to say that messages from above are ambivalent, even in the Scriptures. On the one hand the promises of glory, rule and kingship, on the other hand the admonitions towards humility and meekness. As to self-realization on earth, we would need a better analysis of Church messages, but I think there is strong evidence that encouragement towards self-realization (reaching objectives in life, progress, education, improving living standards, culture of awards and honors ...) is pretty present in the Church literature and Church life, e.g. through examples of &quot;achievers&quot; (again, this is totally independent of a values assessment). On the other hand, we need to make the difference between self-realization and self-glorification (which would have a negative connotation).

Jon (71 &amp; 72), I also think that the scouts program has little future in the Church abroad. Perhaps the Church will also distance itself from it in the future in the U.S. The &quot;revelation&quot; of how much local and regional scouts managers actually earn, big 6 figure salaries, mentioned a few months ago in the press in Utah, gave quite a backlash in comments -- lots of people vowing that was the end of their giving to the scouts program. 

John (73), indeed an interesting observation. It&#039;s obvious nearly all churches / religions are tied to their birth place and it would take centuries to detach them from that origin. That&#039;s what makes this topic so fascinating: to what extent can the Church ever be or become non-American? Denying its Americanisms does not change the essence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for these latest comments!</p>
<p>Cicero (70) raises an interesting question on ideology which I need to study further. My first reaction would be to say that messages from above are ambivalent, even in the Scriptures. On the one hand the promises of glory, rule and kingship, on the other hand the admonitions towards humility and meekness. As to self-realization on earth, we would need a better analysis of Church messages, but I think there is strong evidence that encouragement towards self-realization (reaching objectives in life, progress, education, improving living standards, culture of awards and honors &#8230;) is pretty present in the Church literature and Church life, e.g. through examples of &#8220;achievers&#8221; (again, this is totally independent of a values assessment). On the other hand, we need to make the difference between self-realization and self-glorification (which would have a negative connotation).</p>
<p>Jon (71 &amp; 72), I also think that the scouts program has little future in the Church abroad. Perhaps the Church will also distance itself from it in the future in the U.S. The &#8220;revelation&#8221; of how much local and regional scouts managers actually earn, big 6 figure salaries, mentioned a few months ago in the press in Utah, gave quite a backlash in comments &#8212; lots of people vowing that was the end of their giving to the scouts program. </p>
<p>John (73), indeed an interesting observation. It&#8217;s obvious nearly all churches / religions are tied to their birth place and it would take centuries to detach them from that origin. That&#8217;s what makes this topic so fascinating: to what extent can the Church ever be or become non-American? Denying its Americanisms does not change the essence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mansfield</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/02/how-american-is-the-church/#comment-250710</link>
		<dc:creator>John Mansfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timesandseasons.org/?p=4396#comment-250710</guid>
		<description>When this topic comes up, I remember a visit to Calumet, Michigan.  Sitting on a peninsula in the middle of Lake Superior, Calumet was a booming copper mining town a century ago.  I asked my host why the small downtown was crowded with so many old churches, and he explained that the immigrants that poured into there from many nations all needed a church of their own.  For me, the difference between a Swedish Lutheran church and a Norwegian Lutheran church may not seem worth bothering with in America, but it was to them.

I suspect this is connected with why the Mormon church is perceived by people in other lands as an American church:  For them, all churches are national churches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When this topic comes up, I remember a visit to Calumet, Michigan.  Sitting on a peninsula in the middle of Lake Superior, Calumet was a booming copper mining town a century ago.  I asked my host why the small downtown was crowded with so many old churches, and he explained that the immigrants that poured into there from many nations all needed a church of their own.  For me, the difference between a Swedish Lutheran church and a Norwegian Lutheran church may not seem worth bothering with in America, but it was to them.</p>
<p>I suspect this is connected with why the Mormon church is perceived by people in other lands as an American church:  For them, all churches are national churches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonovitch</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/02/how-american-is-the-church/#comment-250706</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonovitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timesandseasons.org/?p=4396#comment-250706</guid>
		<description>Not sure if anyone is still reading this, but I had one last thought.  The Church would do well to emulate the superb training the BSA has developed.  Practical things like youth protection, creating a safe haven, differences in age groups, and other practical issues would really help the majority of our amateur and otherwise untrained/unexperienced youth leaders.  The best youth training I&#039;ve received has come from our local district/council.  Our stake presidency does one weekend every two years, but other than that and incessant preachings, uh, I mean &quot;meetings,&quot; the Church doesn&#039;t even come close.  

Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if anyone is still reading this, but I had one last thought.  The Church would do well to emulate the superb training the BSA has developed.  Practical things like youth protection, creating a safe haven, differences in age groups, and other practical issues would really help the majority of our amateur and otherwise untrained/unexperienced youth leaders.  The best youth training I&#8217;ve received has come from our local district/council.  Our stake presidency does one weekend every two years, but other than that and incessant preachings, uh, I mean &#8220;meetings,&#8221; the Church doesn&#8217;t even come close.  </p>
<p>Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonovitch</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/02/how-american-is-the-church/#comment-250696</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonovitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timesandseasons.org/?p=4396#comment-250696</guid>
		<description>Adam and Wilfried (68 and 69), my sense is that the LDS version of Scouting never caught on in Germany, probably due at least in part to the fact that it&#039;s difficult to find more than a handful of young men in any given ward/branch.  Besides the Scouting organization as far as I could tell is virtually non-existent there, and is probably true for many other countries.  Plus the whole &quot;I wouldn&#039;t be caught dead&quot; factor.  :)  So, since the official Aims of Scouting (in the BSA anyway) very much parallel the purposes of the Duty to God program, I imagine DTG is for most international units the replacement for an American YM program that didn&#039;t export well to some places.  

In large, American units, the LDS-BSA program works well, but if you&#039;re not an American unit, or if you&#039;re not in a large unit (which I&#039;m currently dealing with in my own small Scouting program), it doesn&#039;t work so well.  I have at least one dad in my ward who was never big on Scouting, and he is convinced that it&#039;s only a matter of time before the DTG program replaces the BSA completely as a YM program.  

I don&#039;t know that I agree with that prediction, based on a number of high-level leadership comments I&#039;ve heard.  But the Duty to God program appears to be the international answer to the failed export of the American LDS Scouting program.  And personally, I think it&#039;s a perfect solution -- it encompasses all the good things that Scouting aims for, adds the specific LDS-religious aspect that Scouting lacks, is not hindered by the size of a unit, and is not tied to any outside organizations that might vary in strength and size.  

This is probably the biggest example of an American church program (LDS-BSA) not exporting well to other countries.  But just look at the great solution (DTG) that came out of it.  

Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam and Wilfried (68 and 69), my sense is that the LDS version of Scouting never caught on in Germany, probably due at least in part to the fact that it&#8217;s difficult to find more than a handful of young men in any given ward/branch.  Besides the Scouting organization as far as I could tell is virtually non-existent there, and is probably true for many other countries.  Plus the whole &#8220;I wouldn&#8217;t be caught dead&#8221; factor.  :)  So, since the official Aims of Scouting (in the BSA anyway) very much parallel the purposes of the Duty to God program, I imagine DTG is for most international units the replacement for an American YM program that didn&#8217;t export well to some places.  </p>
<p>In large, American units, the LDS-BSA program works well, but if you&#8217;re not an American unit, or if you&#8217;re not in a large unit (which I&#8217;m currently dealing with in my own small Scouting program), it doesn&#8217;t work so well.  I have at least one dad in my ward who was never big on Scouting, and he is convinced that it&#8217;s only a matter of time before the DTG program replaces the BSA completely as a YM program.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know that I agree with that prediction, based on a number of high-level leadership comments I&#8217;ve heard.  But the Duty to God program appears to be the international answer to the failed export of the American LDS Scouting program.  And personally, I think it&#8217;s a perfect solution &#8212; it encompasses all the good things that Scouting aims for, adds the specific LDS-religious aspect that Scouting lacks, is not hindered by the size of a unit, and is not tied to any outside organizations that might vary in strength and size.  </p>
<p>This is probably the biggest example of an American church program (LDS-BSA) not exporting well to other countries.  But just look at the great solution (DTG) that came out of it.  </p>
<p>Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cicero</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/02/how-american-is-the-church/#comment-250641</link>
		<dc:creator>Cicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 05:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timesandseasons.org/?p=4396#comment-250641</guid>
		<description>The historical and geographic issues are there of course, but I&#039;d guess the behavior aspect is the most powerful- consider the spread of basketball that seems to follow the Church as well.

However, I think you are overstating the ideological aspect quite a bit.  Primarily because American ideology isn&#039;t nearly as uniform as you imply, nor is the Church as in sync with American ideology as you suggest.

I have never felt the Church promoting self-actualization or glorifying individualism in my life.

If anything I have always felt the Church has been a force in my life against those attitudes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The historical and geographic issues are there of course, but I&#8217;d guess the behavior aspect is the most powerful- consider the spread of basketball that seems to follow the Church as well.</p>
<p>However, I think you are overstating the ideological aspect quite a bit.  Primarily because American ideology isn&#8217;t nearly as uniform as you imply, nor is the Church as in sync with American ideology as you suggest.</p>
<p>I have never felt the Church promoting self-actualization or glorifying individualism in my life.</p>
<p>If anything I have always felt the Church has been a force in my life against those attitudes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilfried</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/02/how-american-is-the-church/#comment-250595</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilfried</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timesandseasons.org/?p=4396#comment-250595</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Adam. Indeed an interesting comparison point where a Church program might be sensed as &quot;American&quot;.

Scouting as such is of course an international endeavor, more usual in some countries than others. I know from Belgium (and other European countries) that the Catholic church has had a widespread scoutsprogram for decades. I recently read that the movement has been picking up again, after some diminishing in the 80s-90s. Of course, &quot;scouting&quot; is sometimes a little different than in the U.S.  As I know it in Belgium in the Catholic church (groups often Catholic by name only) , it&#039;s totally mixed for boys and girls, uniforms are more symbolic (very loose), it&#039;s more the style of a youth club (including disco dance evenings, beer-drinking...), patriotism is out of the question as inappropriate for an organization which is supposed to promote peace (note that in smaller countries &quot;patriotism&quot; is sometimes sensed as a &quot;threat from the outside&quot; -- too much experience with patriotic invaders). I&#039;m sure that in other countries scouting might be more the &quot;original disciplined style&quot;.

I know they had Mormon scouting in Holland, perhaps still. In Belgium we tried it once in the sixties, but it floundered: the American-style, &quot;disciplined&quot; scouts group, with pretty strict uniform and goals to attain, flag raising etc. reminded some people too much of Nazi-youth. It probably also explains why the present scouts group have taken distance from that former style. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Adam. Indeed an interesting comparison point where a Church program might be sensed as &#8220;American&#8221;.</p>
<p>Scouting as such is of course an international endeavor, more usual in some countries than others. I know from Belgium (and other European countries) that the Catholic church has had a widespread scoutsprogram for decades. I recently read that the movement has been picking up again, after some diminishing in the 80s-90s. Of course, &#8220;scouting&#8221; is sometimes a little different than in the U.S.  As I know it in Belgium in the Catholic church (groups often Catholic by name only) , it&#8217;s totally mixed for boys and girls, uniforms are more symbolic (very loose), it&#8217;s more the style of a youth club (including disco dance evenings, beer-drinking&#8230;), patriotism is out of the question as inappropriate for an organization which is supposed to promote peace (note that in smaller countries &#8220;patriotism&#8221; is sometimes sensed as a &#8220;threat from the outside&#8221; &#8212; too much experience with patriotic invaders). I&#8217;m sure that in other countries scouting might be more the &#8220;original disciplined style&#8221;.</p>
<p>I know they had Mormon scouting in Holland, perhaps still. In Belgium we tried it once in the sixties, but it floundered: the American-style, &#8220;disciplined&#8221; scouts group, with pretty strict uniform and goals to attain, flag raising etc. reminded some people too much of Nazi-youth. It probably also explains why the present scouts group have taken distance from that former style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/02/how-american-is-the-church/#comment-250584</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timesandseasons.org/?p=4396#comment-250584</guid>
		<description>Re: Jon comment 67. Last week, I called a boy we baptized in Argentina on my mission to wish him a happy birthday (just turned 19). As we were catching up he asked what my calling was in the ward. I told him that I worked with the scouts (cubmaster was going to take too long to explain). He was curious about the program and asked if the Church had ever done scouts in Argentina. I told him they had but for some reason had stopped. He then told me that he would have been laughed at (or was it &quot;he wouldn&#039;t be caught dead&quot; =) if he had done any scouting as a boy/teenager.

Is this a good example where the Church recognized that scouting was too American and thus not a good fit? Or was it something else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Jon comment 67. Last week, I called a boy we baptized in Argentina on my mission to wish him a happy birthday (just turned 19). As we were catching up he asked what my calling was in the ward. I told him that I worked with the scouts (cubmaster was going to take too long to explain). He was curious about the program and asked if the Church had ever done scouts in Argentina. I told him they had but for some reason had stopped. He then told me that he would have been laughed at (or was it &#8220;he wouldn&#8217;t be caught dead&#8221; =) if he had done any scouting as a boy/teenager.</p>
<p>Is this a good example where the Church recognized that scouting was too American and thus not a good fit? Or was it something else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonovitch</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2008/02/how-american-is-the-church/#comment-250479</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonovitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timesandseasons.org/?p=4396#comment-250479</guid>
		<description>Re: Adam&#039;s comment (54), I think many receptions around the world are held in ward buildings.  They&#039;re clean, they&#039;re big, and they&#039;re free (who&#039;s got the money or the space otherwise?).  In a number of German wards, the chapel doubles as the &quot;cultural hall&quot;, sometimes with a simple curtain drawn in front of the pulpit/sacrament table/organ area.  We wouldn&#039;t dare do something so unholy as to dance in the &quot;chapel&quot; over here, but for them it&#039;s often a simple matter of space.  

Also, before the recent renovations of the Freiberg Temple (a truly &quot;small&quot; temple) in the baptistery, they had a stone-relief of oxen on the wall behind the small font, rather than an actual basin supported by oxen sculptures.  

Along those lines, I remember visiting the Chicago Temple with my then-newlywed wife, and she asked for a pair of headphones so she could listen in German.  The poor elderly sister gave her an odd look.  In Freiberg, every week was a different language, but in Chicago they didn&#039;t know what to do and had to scramble to find headphones and a receiver.  

I&#039;m wondering how American (or how BSA-oriented) the new &quot;international&quot; Duty to God and Personal Progress programs are.  I&#039;ll have to research the German version&#039;s requirements tonight.  

Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Adam&#8217;s comment (54), I think many receptions around the world are held in ward buildings.  They&#8217;re clean, they&#8217;re big, and they&#8217;re free (who&#8217;s got the money or the space otherwise?).  In a number of German wards, the chapel doubles as the &#8220;cultural hall&#8221;, sometimes with a simple curtain drawn in front of the pulpit/sacrament table/organ area.  We wouldn&#8217;t dare do something so unholy as to dance in the &#8220;chapel&#8221; over here, but for them it&#8217;s often a simple matter of space.  </p>
<p>Also, before the recent renovations of the Freiberg Temple (a truly &#8220;small&#8221; temple) in the baptistery, they had a stone-relief of oxen on the wall behind the small font, rather than an actual basin supported by oxen sculptures.  </p>
<p>Along those lines, I remember visiting the Chicago Temple with my then-newlywed wife, and she asked for a pair of headphones so she could listen in German.  The poor elderly sister gave her an odd look.  In Freiberg, every week was a different language, but in Chicago they didn&#8217;t know what to do and had to scramble to find headphones and a receiver.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m wondering how American (or how BSA-oriented) the new &#8220;international&#8221; Duty to God and Personal Progress programs are.  I&#8217;ll have to research the German version&#8217;s requirements tonight.  </p>
<p>Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
