It's like they know us. (Julie) ... See MoreSee Less
At the NB blog: Commentary on The New Era's gender training articles. (Dave) ... See MoreSee Less
If you serve in YW or know a YW, you will want to see these. (Julie) http://bycommonconsent.com/2015/01/26/young-women-values-not-princesses-not-for-the-faint-of-heart/ ... See MoreSee Less
human intelligence + altruism = godhood ... See MoreSee Less
At Clean Cut: "How can a 21st-century church ask people to not talk openly about things?" (Dave) ... See MoreSee Less
Kevin Barney on why faith should be good enough. We need to lower the testimony bar. (Dave) ... See MoreSee Less
Jana Riess on what the Church gets from John Dehlin's upcoming excommunication, besides bad publicity: basically nothing. (Dave) ... See MoreSee Less
Crowd sourcing my kid's seminary problems: a plea for your collective wisdom and experience. http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2015/01/seminary-woes/#comment-529591 ... See MoreSee Less
RealClearReligion ran my post critiquing the dominant narrative (at least in the mainstream press) that John Dehlin's disciplinary council is primarily about his support for same-sex marriage and Ordain Women. I explored some additional points on my own blog. http://difficultrun.nathanielgivens.com/2015/01/20/why-john-dehlin-faces-church-discipline/ (Nathaniel) ... See MoreSee Less
Religion + Math ... See MoreSee Less
At JI, a Q&A with Jared Hickman, author of "The Book of Mormon as Amerindian Apocalypse." (Dave) ... See MoreSee Less
At The Daily Beast: "The Coming Crackdown on Mormon Liberals." (Dave) ... See MoreSee Less
We have announced the 2014 Mormon of the Year.http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2015/… ... See MoreSee Less
In contrast to decades past, I suspect that atheism/agnosticism is a much greater threat to Mormonism than evangelical Christianity. ... See MoreSee Less
Come for the conversion story, stay for an exciting new theology of Golden Plates. ... See MoreSee Less
I’ll bet all of us with sizable book collections have heard this question from time to time.
How do you answer?
(I’ve got a favorite response that I’ll post later, if no one beats me to it.)
A classic response that any academic should be able to appreciate:
“Read them?! Are you kidding? I haven’t even taught them all yet!”
There’s also the distinction between your question and “Have you read all *of* these books?” — every page instead of skimming.
It’s cousin is, “Are these all your books/are these all of your books?”
Depending on who asks…
1. Only the ones with pictures
2. Actually, I\’m illiterate. My therapist says it\’s some type of overcompensation disorder.
Yes. The books I haven’t read are in the other room.
this is, by far, the best response (from Harlan Ellison):
Who wants a library full of books you’ve already read?
Well, Matt Thurston asked me that question on the MMM thread, and I gave this smart-aleck reply:
“My interactions with my Mormon-themed books should be viewed in the same way that FARMS views Joseph Smithâ€™s interactions with his polyandrous wives. We can show for certain that I acquired them, but thereâ€™s no concrete evidence that Iâ€™ve done anything else with any of them.”
If I had to use that one in a conversation, I’d probably shorten it up a little.
“I can’t remember.”
“Some of them twice.”
At least part of every one, with the intension to finish all of them.
My response is, “No, but I have touched them all”
no, that shelf is waiting to be read. Everything I’ve read is sold
(people who know me know I’m a compulsive clear-out-er and my last business was a used bookstore)
Yes I have. And because you clearly are very curious about them, let me summarize each of them for you. I think we should begin with the small yellow books you see there on the top shelf. As you may have guessed by the fact that they all look the same, they were all published by the same publisher, namely Reclam Verlag, a legendary, century-old publisher of German classics. Indeed, it was originally called “”Verlag des literarischen Museums,” which, of course translates, literally as “Publisher of Literary Museums.” The first title there in the stack is “Simplicius Simplicissimus” by Hans Jakob Christoffel von Grimmelshausen — or as it’s also known “Der abenteuerliche Simplicissimus Teutsch.” It’s an important early novel written in the picaresque genre and is about the long and horrible Thirty Years’ War, but it’s quite a delightful read, really, in fact….
I just say, “most of them – except some are reference books and I’ve not read all those.”
Which isn’t that exciting but it reminds me of this scene from the Derrida movie. The film makers are in Derrida’s rather small condo and basically all the walls outside of the kitchen are shelves filled with books. They ask him if he’s read them all and he says no, he’s only read two of them but he has read them very closely.
No… but I need something other than my student loan bill to remind me that I’m educated.
“I like to keep some in reserve, like having money in the bank.”
Any more, I pretty much just buy books because it’s pleasant to have them sitting around the house for a little while before Shannon puts them in the cellar so that they can eventually get water-damaged from some inevitable plumbing mishap.
Oh, I get it, DKL. You mean like the way some of us put leftovers in the fridge to store until they are moldy enough to throw away.
Of course not. Some of them were gifts.
â€œThe surest way to spot a non-reader: someone who comes into your house, looks at your books and asks: â€˜Have you read all these?â€™.â€
â€” Charles Taylor
I have not finished my Hebrew-French lexicon yet.
No! I just found these great deals on used books at the library and the books are hardly even used. But don’t they look great?.
I get this question all the freakin’ time. Especially my family is always asking me this repeatedly, every time the enter my abode. Anyways, my favorite answer to this is found in Umberto Eco’s “How to Justify a Private Library.” One of the best pieces of writing on the subject. He says something like, “These are the ones I need to read by the end of the month, the rest are in storage.”
All I can really say is, ask a stupid question, get a funny answer.
Well, no. But my more educated wife has.
“Not even half.”
Because I haven’t. And since I seem to acquire them faster than I read them, I don’t know that I will ever catch up.
A neighbor that saw our bookshelves full asked why we had so many books. When I said “to read?” wondering what the joke was, he said he just didn’t know people that read books once they finished school, and it seemed like a waste of space that could be used to store DVD’s. I realized most people I know don’t really have bookshelves (at least where I’ve seen them) that are used for anything more than to put up picture frames and the latest issue of the Ensign and/or People magazine.
Being raised in a family that had designed their family rroom around a bookshelf, this was very depressing.
â€œNot even half.â€
Because I havenâ€™t. And since I seem to acquire them faster than I read them, I donâ€™t know that I will ever catch up.
Why do book lovers do this? Even though I know I have ten books I need to read, I still can’t stop myself from buying number eleven. It’s a sickness.
I’ve read most of them. That’s probably what I would say. Isn’t that hilarious?
BTW, looks like T&S is getting reasonably close to having had 2,000,000 visits. Not bad.
I suffer the unbearable temptation of working within a mile of this.
BTW, the full texts of 25k+ books are available here.
No. They hide the entrance to my subterranean superhero lair. You see, my wife insisted when we got married that books neatly organized on shelves would replace the life-size bikini posters I had previously used to obscure the passage into my appropriately furnished (impossibly large blinking computers, stalagtites, etc.) diabolical plan-foiling space.
I suffer the unbearable temptation of working less than a mile from this.
BTW, the full texts of 25k+ books are available online here
You mean all of these are mine? Woohoo!
Yes, I have read them all–so you probably CAN borrow whatever is catching your eye.
if they are nonreaders, it’s funny watching them decide whether or not to live to the everybody-reads assumption.
I loved explaining that we do read the books to the guy from the relocation company who had to tote them out to the van. Yes, sometimes we do read instead of watching a movie.
If only I could convince my husband that a library where books arrive but never leave is like the Dead Sea. I’d like some shelf space for things I haven’t read.
There’s always room for more bookshelves.
Anna Quindlen’s comment on interior decoration resonates with me:
I would be most content if my children grew up to be the kind of people who think decorating consists mostly of building enough bookshelves.
I don’t know that I have ever asked a person if they have read all of their books, but I do know that whenever I visit someone’s house I always check out the book and then judge them based on what they have on their shelves.
“I always check out the book and then judge them based on what they have on their shelves.”
I wonder if my system of hanging on to Mormon Studies and Biblical Studies but purging 95% of everything else is leading to righteous judgment.
Two weeks ago, I had the pure pleasure of assembling my first real library. I now have 720 inches of matching shelves (thank you, IKEA). I felt like I had been socked in the gut when I realized that not everything would fit. Thankfully, there is an empty wall in the master bedroom and IKEA is just up the road . . .
Oh what a sore subject, though. Every summer my husband goes on a book purging rampage and we give literally boxes to GoodWill. Hrumph. We have a teensy apartment and the books always seem to take over. His rationale is once you’ve read them, why keep them around?
I tend to disagree.
“I don’t know; go check my blog. That’s why I keep it.”
Megan’s answer: “Most of them. They’re really good books; you should read them.”
or when asked if you have read all those books i just say “no way” just my years supply of TP for the bad times