<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Mormons a &#8220;myopic&#8221; people?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/12/are-mormons-a-myopic-people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/12/are-mormons-a-myopic-people/</link>
	<description>Truth Will Prevail</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 10:07:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Keeley</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/12/are-mormons-a-myopic-people/#comment-35083</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Keeley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1727#comment-35083</guid>
		<description>Charles, thatâ€™s an interesting point. I agree it does seem that there are already some government based (as well as church based) systems in place for social problems like homelessness, and there is less government involvement in moral issues. But I think thatâ€™s because on social issues itâ€™s pretty safe to assume that most citizens agree that people in need should be helped. (Although, thereâ€™s plenty of disagreement about how that help should be offered.) But on moral issues, thereâ€™s too much disagreement among citizens regarding whatâ€™s appropriate, inappropriate, what should be legalized, what should be illegal, when government should intervene, etc. Obviously,   the government canâ€™t intervene if its citizens canâ€™t agree or come to a majority decision on what should be done.

In my area, though, it really seems like private organizations, not government organizations, are the ones primarily making a difference on social issues like poverty and homelessness. Nearby Santa Monica has a soaring homeless population (it was 30,000 the last time I heard a figure quoted). There are lots of worthy private organizations that need help and support, but again, it seems like members are more interested in getting involved with moral issues, like p0rnography, gambling, etc. Iâ€™m not saying that these issues arenâ€™t important as well, but thereâ€™s no lack of other private organizations out there fueling the fight against these problems. In my opinion, having 30,000 homeless people on the street in your community poses just as much of a problem as having too many strip bars in your community. But we don&#039;t seem to care about that problem as much, or find it as worthy of our attention adn efforts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles, thatâ€™s an interesting point. I agree it does seem that there are already some government based (as well as church based) systems in place for social problems like homelessness, and there is less government involvement in moral issues. But I think thatâ€™s because on social issues itâ€™s pretty safe to assume that most citizens agree that people in need should be helped. (Although, thereâ€™s plenty of disagreement about how that help should be offered.) But on moral issues, thereâ€™s too much disagreement among citizens regarding whatâ€™s appropriate, inappropriate, what should be legalized, what should be illegal, when government should intervene, etc. Obviously,   the government canâ€™t intervene if its citizens canâ€™t agree or come to a majority decision on what should be done.</p>
<p>In my area, though, it really seems like private organizations, not government organizations, are the ones primarily making a difference on social issues like poverty and homelessness. Nearby Santa Monica has a soaring homeless population (it was 30,000 the last time I heard a figure quoted). There are lots of worthy private organizations that need help and support, but again, it seems like members are more interested in getting involved with moral issues, like p0rnography, gambling, etc. Iâ€™m not saying that these issues arenâ€™t important as well, but thereâ€™s no lack of other private organizations out there fueling the fight against these problems. In my opinion, having 30,000 homeless people on the street in your community poses just as much of a problem as having too many strip bars in your community. But we don&#8217;t seem to care about that problem as much, or find it as worthy of our attention adn efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/12/are-mormons-a-myopic-people/#comment-34595</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2004 15:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1727#comment-34595</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure how accurate my thoughts on that are Shannon, but I would imagine that distintion between moral issues and homless or poverty stems from existing  organizations. In most states and cities there is already a large facilitation for homeless, welfare, child services, and many other sicial ills. The government already recognizes the need to help these people. Another topic is whether I believe they are doing the best job they could, the best way the could. Also, there is a large church relief system in place for members and the church works with relilef for non-members in larger scales such as disaster. Thats probably why less involvment seems to be needed by the church for those issues over morality issues.

I think there is an absence of government involvment in morality issues. In fact in many cases, such as gambling, the government endorses immorality because of the financial gain. Citizens groups need to be involved with these issues and I think we can make a huge difference as a church by standing with those who see the same battles being waged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure how accurate my thoughts on that are Shannon, but I would imagine that distintion between moral issues and homless or poverty stems from existing  organizations. In most states and cities there is already a large facilitation for homeless, welfare, child services, and many other sicial ills. The government already recognizes the need to help these people. Another topic is whether I believe they are doing the best job they could, the best way the could. Also, there is a large church relief system in place for members and the church works with relilef for non-members in larger scales such as disaster. Thats probably why less involvment seems to be needed by the church for those issues over morality issues.</p>
<p>I think there is an absence of government involvment in morality issues. In fact in many cases, such as gambling, the government endorses immorality because of the financial gain. Citizens groups need to be involved with these issues and I think we can make a huge difference as a church by standing with those who see the same battles being waged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Keeley</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/12/are-mormons-a-myopic-people/#comment-33967</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Keeley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2004 06:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1727#comment-33967</guid>
		<description>â€œCounsel such as p0rnography, WoW, alcohol, entertainment choices etc certainly set us apart from the world but can also present opportunities to discuss our beliefs with the outside world.â€?
	This is a good point, Charles. Many members of our Los Angeles stake were very active in a community effort to restrict strip bars from being located too close to residential neighborhoods and other places where there are lots of kids.
	It seems that, at least in our area, members are more likely actively get involved in something political if it is linked to a â€œmorally sensitiveâ€? topic, like p0rnography, etc. But when it comes to social problems like homelessness, poverty, etc., it seems we are less likely to get involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€œCounsel such as p0rnography, WoW, alcohol, entertainment choices etc certainly set us apart from the world but can also present opportunities to discuss our beliefs with the outside world.â€?<br />
	This is a good point, Charles. Many members of our Los Angeles stake were very active in a community effort to restrict strip bars from being located too close to residential neighborhoods and other places where there are lots of kids.<br />
	It seems that, at least in our area, members are more likely actively get involved in something political if it is linked to a â€œmorally sensitiveâ€? topic, like p0rnography, etc. But when it comes to social problems like homelessness, poverty, etc., it seems we are less likely to get involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/12/are-mormons-a-myopic-people/#comment-33699</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1727#comment-33699</guid>
		<description>If Poll is addressing the SLC valley specifically I&#039;m not sure what I can contribute besides some observations on population. By the last census, Utah was listed with a 2.2 million population. SLC propper was about 182 thousand and the valley was about 1.3 million. We know the church estimates is membership at about 12 million. I would find it a little troubling to estimate the world wide church as myopic or detached on a 10 percent sample from a very limited pool. 

Perhaps the LDS population does not get so involved on national levels but who is to say how active we are in local issues, which are more of an immediate impact on us than national agendas. Also, its interesting to note activity or inactivity in politics is not the deciding factor in whether we are detached from the world at large. 

I would hope that to a large degree we are. Counsel such as p0rnography, WoW, alcohol, entertainment choices etc certainly set us apart from the world but can also present oprotunities to discuss our beliefs with the outside world. One of the greatest votes we can cast  is the vote with our pocket book. 

Of course there is still politics and LDS activity again is not defiend by how many LDS serve and how high up in political power they serve. Politics is a dirty game. The fact that not many LDS participate goes a long way to say that we would prefer not to get swept up in corruption etc. Now, I understand this doesn&#039;t mean we shouldn&#039;t but thats why I think it is fair to say there is probably more involvement on local levels world wide. 

Out here in the mission field I find a lot of socially active LDS. Most everyone in our ward participates. Maybe that is just the anomally, but I would say thats a strong contradiction to Poll&#039;s assesment of a myopic people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Poll is addressing the SLC valley specifically I&#8217;m not sure what I can contribute besides some observations on population. By the last census, Utah was listed with a 2.2 million population. SLC propper was about 182 thousand and the valley was about 1.3 million. We know the church estimates is membership at about 12 million. I would find it a little troubling to estimate the world wide church as myopic or detached on a 10 percent sample from a very limited pool. </p>
<p>Perhaps the LDS population does not get so involved on national levels but who is to say how active we are in local issues, which are more of an immediate impact on us than national agendas. Also, its interesting to note activity or inactivity in politics is not the deciding factor in whether we are detached from the world at large. </p>
<p>I would hope that to a large degree we are. Counsel such as p0rnography, WoW, alcohol, entertainment choices etc certainly set us apart from the world but can also present oprotunities to discuss our beliefs with the outside world. One of the greatest votes we can cast  is the vote with our pocket book. </p>
<p>Of course there is still politics and LDS activity again is not defiend by how many LDS serve and how high up in political power they serve. Politics is a dirty game. The fact that not many LDS participate goes a long way to say that we would prefer not to get swept up in corruption etc. Now, I understand this doesn&#8217;t mean we shouldn&#8217;t but thats why I think it is fair to say there is probably more involvement on local levels world wide. </p>
<p>Out here in the mission field I find a lot of socially active LDS. Most everyone in our ward participates. Maybe that is just the anomally, but I would say thats a strong contradiction to Poll&#8217;s assesment of a myopic people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Briggs</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/12/are-mormons-a-myopic-people/#comment-33616</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Briggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 05:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1727#comment-33616</guid>
		<description>Julie in Austin: &quot; . . . into a week already filled with Sunday meetings, FHE, Mutual, Enrichment, Scouts . . . did I mention Ward Temple Night and Date Night?&quot;

The church has scaled back on the meetings &amp; their demands on our time. I&#039;m home most nights and I suspect most of you are -- judging by the regularity of your blogging posts (unless you&#039;re posting during bishopric or high council meetings). The last Dialogue has an interview with former Utah Demo Congressman David S. King who was also on the YM General Board. He described what Mutual was REALLY like (back in the 60s &amp; 70s). These programs are much simpler then they used to be. So I&#039;m among those who say we can &amp; ought to do better. 

But first, let me finish reading these blogs . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie in Austin: &#8221; . . . into a week already filled with Sunday meetings, FHE, Mutual, Enrichment, Scouts . . . did I mention Ward Temple Night and Date Night?&#8221;</p>
<p>The church has scaled back on the meetings &#038; their demands on our time. I&#8217;m home most nights and I suspect most of you are &#8212; judging by the regularity of your blogging posts (unless you&#8217;re posting during bishopric or high council meetings). The last Dialogue has an interview with former Utah Demo Congressman David S. King who was also on the YM General Board. He described what Mutual was REALLY like (back in the 60s &#038; 70s). These programs are much simpler then they used to be. So I&#8217;m among those who say we can &#038; ought to do better. </p>
<p>But first, let me finish reading these blogs . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Briggs</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/12/are-mormons-a-myopic-people/#comment-33607</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Briggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 04:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1727#comment-33607</guid>
		<description>Mark B: &quot;Then the Church notified stake presidents to encourage people to get to work, and thousands showed up. City Creek was diverted to one of the major east-west streets, with sandbag embankments, and major damage to the city was averted.&quot;

And on Sunday too. (Apropos of the thread on Ox-in-the-Mire of a while back.)

Terry Tempest Williams&#039; Refuge has a good description.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark B: &#8220;Then the Church notified stake presidents to encourage people to get to work, and thousands showed up. City Creek was diverted to one of the major east-west streets, with sandbag embankments, and major damage to the city was averted.&#8221;</p>
<p>And on Sunday too. (Apropos of the thread on Ox-in-the-Mire of a while back.)</p>
<p>Terry Tempest Williams&#8217; Refuge has a good description.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peggy Snow Cahill</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/12/are-mormons-a-myopic-people/#comment-33593</link>
		<dc:creator>Peggy Snow Cahill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 02:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1727#comment-33593</guid>
		<description>Generally speaking, most of the Latter-day Saints I have known (for about 25 years now) have been some of the most caring, passionate, actively-seeking-to-make-the-world-a-better-place people I&#039;ve ever seen! Yes, in large part by making their homes and families a haven from the world, but also by reaching out to the world and playing some strong roles in grassroots endeavors.

I don&#039;t think in general that we are &quot;myopic&quot;; just maybe a bit preoccupied with all that we trying to do. And it is not easy to be &quot;in the world and not of the world.&quot; Sometimes it is easier to focus on the &quot;not of the world&quot; part and not spend as much time on being &quot;in the world&quot; (I have seen some families that do this--they seem to be completely out of touch with the real world-you know what I mean!). But our Church Leaders teach us that we need to be a part of making the world a better place, and I think that we do. We do have several LDS politicians who are doing their part to try to influence the world. But as fathers and mothers and teachers and doctors and lawyers and writers and citizens, we all have a voice in shaping the world, whether we realize it or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally speaking, most of the Latter-day Saints I have known (for about 25 years now) have been some of the most caring, passionate, actively-seeking-to-make-the-world-a-better-place people I&#8217;ve ever seen! Yes, in large part by making their homes and families a haven from the world, but also by reaching out to the world and playing some strong roles in grassroots endeavors.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think in general that we are &#8220;myopic&#8221;; just maybe a bit preoccupied with all that we trying to do. And it is not easy to be &#8220;in the world and not of the world.&#8221; Sometimes it is easier to focus on the &#8220;not of the world&#8221; part and not spend as much time on being &#8220;in the world&#8221; (I have seen some families that do this&#8211;they seem to be completely out of touch with the real world-you know what I mean!). But our Church Leaders teach us that we need to be a part of making the world a better place, and I think that we do. We do have several LDS politicians who are doing their part to try to influence the world. But as fathers and mothers and teachers and doctors and lawyers and writers and citizens, we all have a voice in shaping the world, whether we realize it or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mansfield</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/12/are-mormons-a-myopic-people/#comment-33589</link>
		<dc:creator>John Mansfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 02:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1727#comment-33589</guid>
		<description>This measure is only so useful, but consider the current U.S. Congressional delegations.  For California, 3 of its 53 Representatives are Mormons; for Arizona 1 of 8; and for Idaho 1 of 2.  Political involvement is only one kind of community involvement, and state legislatures work hard to make Congressional delegations as unrepresentative as they can get away with.  Nevertheless, it is a measure, and by this measure, Mormons are not uninvolved with their communities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This measure is only so useful, but consider the current U.S. Congressional delegations.  For California, 3 of its 53 Representatives are Mormons; for Arizona 1 of 8; and for Idaho 1 of 2.  Political involvement is only one kind of community involvement, and state legislatures work hard to make Congressional delegations as unrepresentative as they can get away with.  Nevertheless, it is a measure, and by this measure, Mormons are not uninvolved with their communities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark B</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/12/are-mormons-a-myopic-people/#comment-33580</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 01:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1727#comment-33580</guid>
		<description>Mickey,

Part of me wants to say &quot;Amen&quot; loudly to the first part of your post, while the other wants to say it even louder to the last line.

It&#039;s like my dad used to say to me, or the dog, &quot;What do you think about when you&#039;re not thinking about anything at all?&quot;  What do we do when we&#039;re not being asked to do something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mickey,</p>
<p>Part of me wants to say &#8220;Amen&#8221; loudly to the first part of your post, while the other wants to say it even louder to the last line.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like my dad used to say to me, or the dog, &#8220;What do you think about when you&#8217;re not thinking about anything at all?&#8221;  What do we do when we&#8217;re not being asked to do something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey</title>
		<link>http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/12/are-mormons-a-myopic-people/#comment-33578</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 01:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1727#comment-33578</guid>
		<description>What is missing here is acknowledgement that the &quot;busy-ness&quot; if often in fact &quot;doing good&quot; in a more effectual way than a lot of &quot;activism.&quot;  Just because BYU students never burnt anything down doesnâ€™t mean theyâ€™ve never done anything to change the world.  The example of the 1980â€™s flood isnâ€™t an example of apathy, it is an example of how the Wasatch Front COMMUNITY communicates.  Different communities get mobilized in different ways.  All those anti-globalization demonstrators arenâ€™t simply responding spontaneously to one plea from a â€œleaderâ€? on the boob toob.  They are organized very carefully in ways that work in their communities.

The Latter-day Saints are very engaged in making the world a better place.  We just do it in a slightly different way and a little more quietly.  Having said that, we can always do better</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is missing here is acknowledgement that the &#8220;busy-ness&#8221; if often in fact &#8220;doing good&#8221; in a more effectual way than a lot of &#8220;activism.&#8221;  Just because BYU students never burnt anything down doesnâ€™t mean theyâ€™ve never done anything to change the world.  The example of the 1980â€™s flood isnâ€™t an example of apathy, it is an example of how the Wasatch Front COMMUNITY communicates.  Different communities get mobilized in different ways.  All those anti-globalization demonstrators arenâ€™t simply responding spontaneously to one plea from a â€œleaderâ€? on the boob toob.  They are organized very carefully in ways that work in their communities.</p>
<p>The Latter-day Saints are very engaged in making the world a better place.  We just do it in a slightly different way and a little more quietly.  Having said that, we can always do better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
