Comments on: A New Blog http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/05/a-new-blog-2/ Truth Will Prevail Tue, 22 May 2012 19:15:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: David King Landrith http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/05/a-new-blog-2/#comment-2030 David King Landrith Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=810#comment-2030 Left leaning? These "Political Juice" guys have fallen over the edge of political sanity. If hate speech laws are ever seriously enacted, one has to wonder if they'd apply to this kind of extremism. Left leaning? These “Political Juice” guys have fallen over the edge of political sanity. If hate speech laws are ever seriously enacted, one has to wonder if they’d apply to this kind of extremism.

]]> By: Randy http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/05/a-new-blog-2/#comment-2031 Randy Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=810#comment-2031 Nothing like a little hyperbolic overreation to get us started in the morning. Shesh. Nothing like a little hyperbolic overreation to get us started in the morning. Shesh.

]]> By: Jeremy http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/05/a-new-blog-2/#comment-2032 Jeremy Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=810#comment-2032 Hate speech? Extremism? Huh?! Let's take it down a notch, eh? Hate speech? Extremism? Huh?! Let’s take it down a notch, eh?

]]> By: lyle http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/05/a-new-blog-2/#comment-2033 lyle Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=810#comment-2033 PJ isn't what I would call hate speech. I will be copying his quasi-non-partisan comparison of Bush & Kerry at the mormons4bush website. I think his first entry was pretty good. I just want to show you the other slant in greater detail. :) PJ isn’t what I would call hate speech.
I will be copying his quasi-non-partisan comparison of Bush & Kerry at the mormons4bush website.

I think his first entry was pretty good. I just want to show you the other slant in greater detail. :)

]]> By: David King Landrith http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/05/a-new-blog-2/#comment-2034 David King Landrith Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=810#comment-2034 I meant it kind of tongue & cheek and partly ironical (e.g., non-left-leaners tend to dislike hate-speech laws). I'm guessing I should try to do a better job of making that obvious. (On the other hand, they do call for Rumsfeld's resignation based on fake internet porn...) I meant it kind of tongue & cheek and partly ironical (e.g., non-left-leaners tend to dislike hate-speech laws). I’m guessing I should try to do a better job of making that obvious.

(On the other hand, they do call for Rumsfeld’s resignation based on fake internet porn…)

]]> By: Jeremy http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/05/a-new-blog-2/#comment-2035 Jeremy Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=810#comment-2035 "they do call for Rumsfeld's resignation based on fake internet porn" I'm assuming this is a joke as well? “they do call for Rumsfeld’s resignation based on fake internet porn”

I’m assuming this is a joke as well?

]]> By: Ben S http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/05/a-new-blog-2/#comment-2036 Ben S Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=810#comment-2036 I think David King Landrith is referring to the calls for Rumself to resign based on extremely explicit images of soldiers and "Iraqi" women. Turns out the images were from a pr0n site that imitates such things, not Iraq. This fact has not led the accusers to retract their demand that Rumsfeld resign, AFAIK. I think David King Landrith is referring to the calls for Rumself to resign based on extremely explicit images of soldiers and “Iraqi” women. Turns out the images were from a pr0n site that imitates such things, not Iraq. This fact has not led the accusers to retract their demand that Rumsfeld resign, AFAIK.

]]> By: Jeremy http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/05/a-new-blog-2/#comment-2037 Jeremy Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=810#comment-2037 I don't think anyone's criticism of Rumsfeld is based on those photos alone--the verified photos from Abu Ghraib are plenty incriminating. I don’t think anyone’s criticism of Rumsfeld is based on those photos alone–the verified photos from Abu Ghraib are plenty incriminating.

]]> By: lyle http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/05/a-new-blog-2/#comment-2038 lyle Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=810#comment-2038 Ben/Jeremy: (Start slight sarcasm) Yeah, but it would be too much to ask for false accusations made vs. Rumsfeld to be publicly retracted, right? Maybe the left-leaning accusers who referenced the fake-porn shots could _Apologize_? nah...i mean...apologies are only for those you disagree with, right? Ben/Jeremy: (Start slight sarcasm) Yeah, but it would be too much to ask for false accusations made vs. Rumsfeld to be publicly retracted, right? Maybe the left-leaning accusers who referenced the fake-porn shots could _Apologize_? nah…i mean…apologies are only for those you disagree with, right?

]]> By: Kingsley http://timesandseasons.org/index.php/2004/05/a-new-blog-2/#comment-2039 Kingsley Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=810#comment-2039 Left-leaning accusers who reference fake stuff occasionally make retractions, but bury them (as in the case of the New York Time and Washington Post) on page Z-19 in very small print. Left-leaning accusers who reference fake stuff occasionally make retractions, but bury them (as in the case of the New York Time and Washington Post) on page Z-19 in very small print.

]]>